Caesarean section versus vaginal birth in the perception of woman who gave birth by both methods

Recommended Citation Olaru, Octavian Gabriel; Stanescu, Anca Daniela; Raduta, Cristina; Ples, Liana; Vasilache, Adriana; Bacalbasa, Nicolae; Vasilache, Andrei; and Balalau, Oana Denisa () "Caesarean section versus vaginal birth in the perception of woman who gave birth by both methods," Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences: Vol. 8 : Iss. 1 , Article 17. DOI: 10.22543/7674.81.P127132 Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/jmms/vol8/iss1/17

[1]  J. Llorca,et al.  Low birth weight trends in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, 2000–2015: economic, health system and demographic conditionings , 2021, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[2]  G. Jakiel,et al.  Peripartum Predictors of the Risk of Postpartum Depressive Disorder: Results of a Case-Control Study , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  A. Stănescu,et al.  Maternal infections with an increased risk of transmission to the foetus; a literature review , 2020 .

[4]  A. Stănescu,et al.  The quality of sexual life after vaginal surgical interventions , 2020 .

[5]  L. Pleș,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section – literature review and modern guidelines , 2020 .

[6]  G. Olaru,et al.  Patients’ perception of childbirth according to the delivery method: The experience in our clinic , 2019, Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences.

[7]  N. Bacalbașa,et al.  The correlation between histopathological and ultrasound findings regarding Cesarean section scars – A three-year survey study , 2019, Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences.

[8]  N. Morken,et al.  Maternal reasons for requesting planned cesarean section in Norway: a qualitative study , 2019, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[9]  C. Ionescu,et al.  The problems associated with adolescent pregnancy in Romania: A cross‐sectional study , 2018, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[10]  D. Bălălău,et al.  Postpartum depression: Prevention and multimodal therapy , 2018, Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences.

[11]  M. Maputle.  Support provided by midwives to women during labour in a public hospital, Limpopo Province, South Africa: a participant observation study , 2018, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[12]  D. Bălălău,et al.  The psychosocial impact of vaginal delivery and cesarean section in primiparous women , 2018 .

[13]  Nuray Egelioğlu Çetişli,et al.  Maternal attachment and breastfeeding behaviors according to type of delivery in the immediate postpartum period. , 2018, Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira.

[14]  A. Barros,et al.  Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[15]  J. Norman,et al.  Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, PLoS medicine.

[16]  D. Bălălău,et al.  Cesarean scar defects and placental abnormalities – a 3 year survey study , 2017 .

[17]  D. Payne,et al.  Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education , 2017, Reproductive Health.

[18]  H. Sveinsdóttir,et al.  The predictive role of support in the birth experience: A longitudinal cohort study. , 2017, Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives.

[19]  W. Carlo,et al.  A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of cesarean section in low‐ and middle‐income countries , 2017, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[20]  S. Georgescu,et al.  Post-Finasteride Adverse Effects in Male Androgenic Alopecia: A Case Report of Vitiligo , 2017, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[21]  D. Bălălău,et al.  Emergency peripartum hysterectomy, physical and mental consequences: a 6-year study , 2016 .

[22]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population‐based ecological study with longitudinal data , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[23]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies , 2015, Reproductive Health.

[24]  C. Ronsmans,et al.  Cesarean section in Shanghai: women’s or healthcare provider’s preferences? , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[25]  M. Little,et al.  Midwifery support in labour: how important is it to stay in the room? , 2014, The practising midwife.

[26]  L. Sarno,et al.  Placenta accreta: incidence and risk factors in an area with a particularly high rate of cesarean section , 2013, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[27]  T. Lau,et al.  Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study. , 2008, Birth.

[28]  S. Wen,et al.  Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta praevia and placental abruption in second pregnancy , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[29]  M. Permezel,et al.  Cesarean Delivery or Vaginal Birth: A Survey of Patient and Clinician Thresholds , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  E. Halmesmäki,et al.  Fear of childbirth: a neglected dilemma , 2003, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[31]  R. Paul,et al.  Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  Carla Finger.  Caesarean section rates skyrocket in Brazil. Many women are opting for caesareans in the belief that it is a practical solution. , 2003, Lancet.