Videoconferencing in English schools: one technology, many pedagogies?

This paper explores the use of videoconferencing as used in English schools, drawing on data collected over seven years from a number of funded and unfunded projects. A common theme emerging from across these investigations is that the educational use of videoconferencing technology in schools is not a unitary phenomenon. Rather, different assumptions about learning, and the employment of different pedagogical skills facilitate varying patterns of usage and levels of educational effectiveness. Following initial experimentation with videoconferencing (which we characterise as the familiarisation phase) preliminary classroom usage was typically ‘bolted‐on’ to existing practice. Growing confidence in the technology was associated with a wider range of pedagogical techniques whereby videoconferencing contributed to curriculum enhancement. The most advanced usage involved the adaptation of the technology for more innovative approaches in which videoconferencing enabled learner–learner interaction, without the mediation of the teacher. In the paper, the advantages and disadvantages of these varying modes of use are explored. We conclude that innovative deployment of videoconferencing pedagogy is in its infancy in English schools, but that teachers exposed to its potential quickly find new ways of exploiting the pedagogical possibilities offered by the technology.

[1]  Dale S. Niederhauser,et al.  Socio-Cultural Analysis of Two Cases of Distance Learning in Secondary Education , 2005, Education and Information Technologies.

[2]  Jason Dennison Understanding the Utilization of Interactive Videoconferencing in the K12 Setting , 2008 .

[3]  Tony Lawson,et al.  Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: a literature review , 2010 .

[4]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Desktop Videoconferencing as a Basis for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning in K-12 Classrooms , 1999 .

[5]  Jenny Gage What Does MOTIVATE Do , 2001 .

[6]  Nancy Yost Lights, Camera, Action: Videoconferencing in Kindergarten , 2001 .

[7]  Mimi Miyoung Lee ‘Making it relevant’: a rural teacher’s integration of an international studies program , 2007 .

[8]  Tony Lawson,et al.  Superhighways technology: personnel factors leading to successful integration of information and communications technology in schools and colleges , 1999 .

[9]  Marie Martin,et al.  Seeing is believing: the role of videoconferencing in distance learning , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  D. Meadows-Klue The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[11]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Perceptions of an impending high speed, broadband network: Anticipation and anxiety among K-12 teachers, technical support personnel, and administrators , 2006 .

[12]  Border Ireland,et al.  North Eastern Education and Library Board , 2006 .

[13]  Richard Thorpe,et al.  The use of personal video conferencing with special needs pupils from three schools serving rural areas: a case of successful adoption of new technology , 1998 .

[14]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[15]  S. Harris,et al.  Innovative pedagogical practices using ICT in schools in England , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[16]  Markus B. Zimmer A Practical Guide to Videoconferencing. , 1988 .