Judgements about Computer Ethics: Do Individual, Co-worker, and Company Judgements Differ? Do Company Codes Make a Difference

When faced with an ambiguous ethical situation related to computer technology (CT), the individual's course of action is influenced by personal experiences and opinions, consideration of what co-workers would do in the same situation, and an expectation of what the organization might sanction. In this article, the judgement of over three-hundred Association of Information Technology Professionals (AITP) members concerning the actions taken in a series of CT ethical scenarios are examined. Respondents expressed their personal judgement, as well as their perception of their co-workers' judgement, and their understanding of the organization's judgement of the actions described in the scenarios. The findings show that there are differences in respondents' judgements for self, co-workers, and organization. Definitive patterns were also found between groups with and without organizational codes related to CT.

[1]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[2]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[3]  H. Becker,et al.  Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy—An Empirical Investigation , 1984 .

[4]  James A. Waters,et al.  The moral dimension of organizational culture , 1987 .

[5]  Earl A. Molander.  A paradigm for design, promulgation and enforcement of ethical codes , 1987 .

[6]  Bart Victor,et al.  The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates , 1988 .

[7]  Alan J. Dubinsky,et al.  Organizational dimensions of marketing-research ethics , 1988 .

[8]  I. P. Akaah,et al.  Judgments of Marketing Professionals about Ethical Issues in Marketing Research: A Replication and Extension , 1989 .

[9]  David B. Paradice,et al.  Ethical attitudes of entry-level MIS personnel , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[10]  David H. Martin,et al.  Professional Codes of Conduct and Computer Ethics Education , 1990, SGSC.

[11]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Discovering and Disciplining Computer Abuse in Organizations: A Field Study , 1990, MIS Q..

[12]  David B. Paradice,et al.  The ethical decision-making processes of information systems workers , 1991 .

[13]  J. Kottke,et al.  Measuring Individual Beliefs about Organizational Ethics , 1991 .

[14]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Experimental Approaches to Studying Ethical-Unethical Behavior in Organizations , 1992, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[15]  Ernest A. Kallman,et al.  Developing a code for ethical computer use , 1992, J. Syst. Softw..

[16]  S. Grover,et al.  Why Professionals Lie: The Impact of Professional Role Conflict on Reporting Accuracy , 1993 .

[17]  Morgan P. Miles,et al.  Codes of ethics and firm size: A stakeholder approach to strategic planning , 1993 .

[18]  S. Athey,et al.  A comparison of experts' and high tech students' ethical beliefs in computer-related situations , 1993 .

[19]  Donald Gotterbarn,et al.  Using the new ACM code of ethics in decision making , 1993, CACM.

[20]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Strategies for incorporating formal specifications in software development , 1994, CACM.

[21]  Betsy Stevens,et al.  An analysis of corporate ethical code studies: “Where do we go from here?” , 1994 .

[22]  J. W. Henry,et al.  Computer ethics: a model of the influences on the individual's ethical decision making , 1994, CPRS.

[23]  Karen D. Loch,et al.  Ethics and information technology use: a factor analysis of attitudes to computer use , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[24]  John M. Mulvey,et al.  Accountability and computer decision systems , 1995, CACM.

[25]  Karen D. Loch,et al.  Evaluating ethical decision making and computer use , 1996, CACM.

[26]  Margaret Anne Pierce,et al.  Computer ethics: The role of personal, informal, and formal codes , 1996 .

[27]  Susan J. Harrington,et al.  The Effect of Codes of Ethics and Personal Denial of Responsibility on Computer Abuse Judgments and Intentions , 1996, MIS Q..

[28]  C. Horvath.  Macro and Micro: The Emerging Field of Organizational Ethics , 1997 .

[29]  David C. Wyld,et al.  The Importance of Context: The Ethical Work Climate Construct and Models of Ethical Decision Making -- An Agenda for Research , 1997 .

[30]  Kenneth J. Smith,et al.  Opening the Black Box: Corporate Codes of Ethics in Their Organizational Context , 1997 .

[31]  M. Kaptein,et al.  Twelve Gordian Knots When Developing an Organizational Code of Ethics , 1998 .

[32]  M. Cleek,et al.  Can corporate codes of ethics influence behavior? , 1998 .

[33]  André H.J. Nijhof,et al.  An ABC-analysis of Ethical Organizational Behavior , 1999 .

[34]  B. Stevens.  Communicating Ethical Values: A Study of Employee Perceptions , 1999 .

[35]  Randi L. Sims,et al.  Determinants of Ethical Decision Making: The Relationship of the Perceived Organizational Environment , 1999 .

[36]  Daniel C. Mack,et al.  Ethics Resource Center , 2001 .

[37]  R. Likert.  “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.