Evaluation of adaptive thermal comfort models in moderate climates and their impact on energy use in

Abstract Thermally Activated Building Systems (TABS) are regarded as top-cooling systems rather than full air-conditioning systems. Therefore, adaptive thermal comfort models (ASHRAE55, ISSO74 or EN15251) are supposed to be applicable to TABS buildings, although the comfort model conditions are not necessarily satisfied. This paper investigates whether, for a moderate climate and with the heating and cooling set points chosen according to the adaptive models, the building’s energy use reduces. After all, applying adaptive models, if appropriate, is thought to lower energy use because higher maximum operative zone temperatures T op , max are allowed, compared to the conventional ISO7730 model. For purpose of generality, a building with an ideal heating and cooling system is considered. Analysis of moderate climate weather data reveals a low energy reducing potential for the ASHRAE55 and ISSO74 model, because high reference outdoor temperatures hardly occur. EN15251 on the other hand, allows very high T op , max and will lower the cooling need. A 2-zone building simulation demonstrates a higher cooling need for ASHRAE55 and ISSO74, compared to ISO7730. Because cooling is needed during the whole year, the lower winter T op , max of these adaptive models causes these unexpected results. With real data of warmer years or varying gains, this conclusion holds.

[1]  F. Nicol,et al.  Derivation of the adaptive equations for thermal comfort in free-running buildings in European standard EN15251 , 2010 .

[2]  M Martin Barták,et al.  Trend in heat gains from office equipment , 2007 .

[3]  Viktor Dorer,et al.  Application range of thermally activated building systems tabs , 2007 .

[4]  Viktor Dorer,et al.  Regelung und Steuerung von thermoaktiven Bauteilsystemen (TABS) , 2009 .

[5]  Sebastian Herkel,et al.  Comparison of low-energy office buildings in summer using different thermal comfort criteria , 2007 .

[6]  Vice President,et al.  AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEERS INC. , 2007 .

[7]  Bjarne W. Olesen,et al.  Introduction to thermal comfort standards and to the proposed new version of EN ISO 7730 , 2002 .

[8]  N. A. Oseland,et al.  Predicted and reported thermal sensation in climate chambers, offices and homes , 1995 .

[9]  R. de Dear,et al.  Adaptive temperature limits: A new guideline in The Netherlands: A new approach for the assessment of building performance with respect to thermal indoor climate☆ , 2006 .

[10]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Thermal comfort and workplace occupant satisfaction—Results of field studies in German low energy office buildings , 2007 .

[11]  Gregor P. Henze,et al.  Impact of adaptive comfort criteria and heat waves on optimal building thermal mass control , 2007 .

[12]  Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.  Quantifying the relevance of adaptive thermal comfort models in moderate thermal climate zones , 2007 .

[13]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[14]  Gail Brager,et al.  Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55 , 2002 .

[15]  Standard Ashrae Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .