Modified ADM1 structure for modelling municipal primary sludge hydrolysis.

This study elaborates the rate-limiting steps of particle disintegration/hydrolysis of primary sludge using methane production rate (MPR) curves from multiple batch experiments. Anaerobic batch degradation of fresh primary sludge showed a complex MPR curve marked with two well-defined temporal peaks. The first immediate peak was associated with the degradation of relatively readily hydrolysable substrates, while the second delayed peak was associated with the degradation of large-sized particles. For simulating the second delayed peak, it was necessary to consider a more elaborate particle disintegration/hydrolysis model. Based on the anaerobic respirograms of 17 runs in four datasets and using a substrate characterisation approach similar to activated sludge models (ASMs), the primary sludge was classified into three biodegradable fractions having different kinetics. These are (1) a hydrolysable substrate (X(Settle-I)) showing a degradation typical to slowly biodegradable compounds, (2) a substrate fraction (X(Settle-II)) having a degradation similar to lysis of biomass fraction and (3) a substrate requiring disintegration before hydrolysis (X(Settle-III)) representing the large-sized particles in primary sludge. Based on these results, modifications in the model structure of anaerobic digestion model no. 1 (ADM1) are proposed to improve the modelling of primary sludge solid degradation in anaerobic digesters.

[1]  Willi Gujer,et al.  Estimation of kinetic parameters of heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and characterization of wastewater for activated sludge modeling , 1992 .

[2]  G. Zeeman,et al.  Anaerobic hydrolysis kinetics of particulate substrates. , 2000, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  V. Vavilin,et al.  A description of hydrolysis kinetics in anaerobic degradation of particulate organic matter , 1996 .

[4]  A. Guwy.  Equipment used for testing anaerobic biodegradability and activity , 2004 .

[5]  T. Noike,et al.  An approach for substrate mapping between ASM and ADM1 for sludge digestion. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  E. Morgenroth,et al.  The influence of particle size on microbial hydrolysis of protein particles in activated sludge. , 2006, Water research.

[7]  M. Spérandio,et al.  Wastewater COD characterization: biodegradability of physico-chemical fractions. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  J. Jansen,et al.  Hydrolysis of return sludge for production of easily biodegradable carbon: effect of pre-treatment, sludge age and temperature. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  J. Ferguson,et al.  Solubilization of particulate organic carbon during the acid phase of anaerobic digestion , 1981 .

[10]  S. Pavlostathis,et al.  Kinetics of anaerobic treatment: A critical review , 1991 .

[11]  J. Rintala,et al.  Simplified hydrolysis models for the optimal design of two-stage anaerobic digestion. , 2001, Water research.

[12]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Important limitations in the modeling of activated sludge: biased calibration of the hydrolysis process. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.