Configuration Analysis of the ERS Points in Large-Volume Metrology System

In aircraft assembly, multiple laser trackers are used simultaneously to measure large-scale aircraft components. To combine the independent measurements, the transformation matrices between the laser trackers’ coordinate systems and the assembly coordinate system are calculated, by measuring the enhanced referring system (ERS) points. This article aims to understand the influence of the configuration of the ERS points that affect the transformation matrix errors, and then optimize the deployment of the ERS points to reduce the transformation matrix errors. To optimize the deployment of the ERS points, an explicit model is derived to estimate the transformation matrix errors. The estimation model is verified by the experiment implemented in the factory floor. Based on the proposed model, a group of sensitivity coefficients are derived to evaluate the quality of the configuration of the ERS points, and then several typical configurations of the ERS points are analyzed in detail with the sensitivity coefficients. Finally general guidance is established to instruct the deployment of the ERS points in the aspects of the layout, the volume size and the number of the ERS points, as well as the position and orientation of the assembly coordinate system.

[1]  Yuhe Li,et al.  A novel orientation and position measuring system for large & medium scale precision assembly , 2014 .

[2]  S. Umeyama,et al.  Least-Squares Estimation of Transformation Parameters Between Two Point Patterns , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[4]  Jay B. West,et al.  The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Jody Muelaner,et al.  LARGE SCALE METROLOGY IN AEROSPACE ASSEMBLY , 2008 .

[7]  C.Read Predmore,et al.  Bundle adjustment of multi-position measurements using the Mahalanobis distance , 2010 .

[8]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices , 1988 .

[9]  Allan D. Spence,et al.  Sensor fusion of laser trackers for use in large-scale precision metrology , 2004, SPIE Optics East.

[10]  Joseph Matthew Calkins,et al.  Quantifying Coordinate Uncertainty Fields in Coupled Spatial Measurement systems , 2002 .

[11]  Pavel Krsek,et al.  Robust Euclidean alignment of 3D point sets: the trimmed iterative closest point algorithm , 2005, Image Vis. Comput..

[12]  Joseph M. Calkins,et al.  A Practical Method for Evaluating Measurement System Uncertainty , 2000 .

[13]  Alfons Meid-Leica Geosystems,et al.  Dynamic Weighting of Laser Tracker Measurements for Bundle Adjustment , .

[14]  Robert B. Fisher,et al.  Estimating 3-D rigid body transformations: a comparison of four major algorithms , 1997, Machine Vision and Applications.