Preferences in Symmetries and Symmetries in Drawings: Asymmetries between Ages and Sexes

Visual structure in art has been studied by Arnheim [1] and more recently by Leyton [2] who suggests that an analysis of symmetrical structure is fundamental to the understanding of visual structure. Three experiments revealed age and sex differences in symmetry preferences with dot patterns and productions in drawings by children and adults. Asymmetrical patterns were less preferred and seen as less symmetrical with age, while patterns with multiple symmetries [3] showed the opposite effects. Increasingly complex and creative use of symmetries with age were seen in drawings. Greater preference for multiple symmetries in dot patterns by females and more frequent use of bilateral symmetry in drawings by girls and multiple symmetries by women were in contrast to judgments of greater overall symmetry in drawings by males.

[1]  J. Mcglone,et al.  Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  G Gainotti,et al.  Patterns of drawing disability in right and left hemispheric patients. , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  E K Warrington,et al.  Drawing disability in relation to laterality of cerebral lesion. , 1966, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  D. Crowe,et al.  Symmetries of Culture: Theory and Practice of Plane Pattern Analysis , 1990 .

[5]  G. Humphrey,et al.  Sex differences in infant reaching , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Irwin Silverman,et al.  Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. , 1992 .

[7]  J. Kolodny,et al.  Memory Processes in Classification Learning: An Investigation of Amnesic Performance in Categorization of Dot Patterns and Artistic Styles , 1994 .

[8]  Andrew Kertesz,et al.  Hemispheric contributions to drawing , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  Y. M. Ha.  Symmetry in pictures by young Chinese children , 1989 .

[11]  I. C. McManus,et al.  Compositional Geometry in Pictures , 1995 .

[12]  F. Royer,et al.  Detection of symmetry. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  S. Kosslyn.  Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[14]  N. Martin,et al.  Spatial ability and throwing accuracy , 1983, Behavior genetics.

[15]  I. Silverman,et al.  The Hunter-Gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays , 1994 .

[16]  T. M. Amabile.  Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[17]  B Tversky,et al.  Force of symmetry in form perception. , 1984, The American journal of psychology.

[18]  P. Dodwell.  The Lie transformation group model of visual perception , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  E. Brunswik.  Organismic achievement and environmental probability. , 1943 .

[20]  Fernande Saint-Martin,et al.  Semiotics of visual language , 2021, Advances in semiotics.

[21]  M. Leyton.  Symmetry, Causality, Mind , 1999 .

[22]  M. Mendelson,et al.  The effects of symmetry and contour on recognition memory in children. , 1981, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  D. Kimura,et al.  Sex differences in cerebral organization for speech and praxic functions. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[24]  Douglas F. Carlson,et al.  Development of the infant's hand preference for visually directed reaching: Preliminary report of a longitudinal study , 1985 .

[25]  R. Arnheim,et al.  Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. , 1956 .

[26]  D E Humphrey,et al.  The role of structure in infant visual pattern perception. , 1989, Canadian journal of psychology.

[27]  R A Harshman,et al.  Individual differences in cognitive abilities and brain organization, Part I: Sex and handedness differences in ability. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[28]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[29]  G Johansson,et al.  Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception , 1976, Psychological research.

[30]  D. Kimura,et al.  Spontaneous Drawing in an Unselected Sample of Patients with Unilateral Cerebral Damage , 1987 .

[31]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[32]  David J. Hargreaves.  The Development of Ideational Fluency: Some Normative Data. , 1982 .

[33]  D. Kimura,et al.  Sex differences in route-learning , 1993 .

[34]  Brenda Milner,et al.  Memory for different aspects of complex visual scenes after unilateral temporal- or frontal-lobe resection , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Alan P. Neuren.  The Lopsided Ape , 1992, Neurology.

[36]  W C Hoffman,et al.  Geometric psychology generates the visual gestalt. , 1985, Canadian journal of psychology.

[37]  M. McClintock,et al.  Asymmetric action in the human newborn: sex differences in patterns of organization. , 1992, Child development.

[38]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[39]  D J Woodward,et al.  Sex differences in the fetal human corpus callosum. , 1986, Human neurobiology.

[40]  C. H. Vanderwolf,et al.  The relation between hand preference and the performance of individual finger movements by left and right hands. , 1970, Brain : a journal of neurology.