Students’ intentions to purchase electronic textbooks

Textbooks have played an important role in education for decades. Given the significant number of technology applications in education, it is not surprising that at least one such application is the electronic textbook (e-textbook). There are a variety of motivations to adopt an e-textbook, including frequent content updates and low costs. The research presented here examines students’ behavioral intentions to purchase an e-textbook when given the choice. The theoretical foundation of the research is provided by social cognitive theory. The data used in the empirical study were collected by distributing a questionnaire to students at a medium-sized university in the western United States. Student responses used in the analysis all reported prior use of an e-textbook. The model was estimated using a structural equations approach. The results showed that both ease of e-textbook use and verbal persuasion/social norm positively influence behavioral intentions to purchase an e-textbook through both self-efficacy and outcome expectancy/usefulness. Previous computer experience positively influences behavioral intentions to purchase an e-textbook only through self-efficacy. Based on these results, conclusions are provided.

[1]  R. W. Stone,et al.  Computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy: the effects on the end-user's job satisfaction , 1995, CPRS.

[2]  A Bandura,et al.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: Cognitive Theory. , 1986 .

[3]  Forbes Gibb,et al.  E-Book Technology and Its Potential Applications in Distance Education , 2006, J. Digit. Inf..

[4]  Robert W. Stone,et al.  The Roles of Computer Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy in Influencing the Computer End-User's Organizational Commitment , 2003, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[5]  Rebecca Hill.  Turning the Page: Forget about Those Bulky Backbreakers, Digital Textbooks Are the Future. , 2010 .

[6]  Robert W. Stone,et al.  Factors Influencing College Students' Use of Computer Security , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Secur. Priv..

[7]  John J. Siegfried,et al.  The Structure of the Introductory Economics Course in United States Colleges , 1983 .

[8]  R. Leon Price,et al.  Linking Theory Construction and Theory Testing: Models with Multiple Indicators of Latent Variables , 1986 .

[9]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Determinants of MIS employees' turnover intentions: a structural equation model , 1992, CACM.

[13]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[14]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Toward Development of the End User Computing Construct in a University Setting , 1993 .

[15]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[16]  T. Busch.  Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers , 1995 .

[17]  Michael R. Mullen,et al.  Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit , 2008 .

[18]  Bassam Hasan,et al.  The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Kim Seidel,et al.  Online Textbooks Deliver Timely, Real-World Content , 2009 .

[20]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success , 2005, DATB.

[22]  Philip Bobko,et al.  The Computer Understanding and Experience Scale: a self-report measure of computer experience , 1998 .

[23]  Nai-Chang Cheng,et al.  Programmer perceptions of knowledge-sharing behavior under social cognitive theory , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings , 1995 .

[25]  Rob Reynolds,et al.  Trends Influencing the Growth of Digital Textbooks in US Higher Education , 2011 .

[26]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[27]  James C. Lester,et al.  Modeling self-efficacy in intelligent tutoring systems: An inductive approach , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[28]  David B. Daniel,et al.  E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[30]  Samer Khasawneh,et al.  Self-efficacy and college students' perceptions and use of online learning systems , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Michael Weisberg,et al.  Student Attitudes and Behaviors Towards Digital Textbooks , 2011 .

[32]  Robert W. Stone,et al.  End-user perceptions of the impacts of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy on job performance and patient care when using a medical information system , 1999 .

[33]  Jack Suess,et al.  Identity Management and Trust Services: Foundations for Cloud Computing. , 2009 .

[34]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[35]  J. Guilford.  Psychometric methods, 2nd ed. , 1954 .

[36]  Malcolm Brown,et al.  The NetGens 2.0: Clouds on the Horizon , 2009 .

[37]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[38]  Douglas Havelka,et al.  Predicting Software Self Efficacy among Business Students: A Preliminary Assessment , 2003, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[39]  Ann-Marie K. Baronas,et al.  Restoring a Sense of Control During Implementation: How User Involvement Leads to System Acceptance , 1988, MIS Q..

[40]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[41]  Brenda Cantwell Wilson,et al.  Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors , 2001, SIGCSE '01.

[42]  Catherine Rampell.  Free Textbooks: An Online Company Tries a Controversial Publishing Model. , 2008 .

[43]  Denise Potosky,et al.  A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[45]  Robert W. Stone,et al.  The roles of computer self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and attribution theory in impacting computer system use , 2001 .

[46]  Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al.  Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  A. Birch,et al.  Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: applying the UTAUT model , 2009 .

[48]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[49]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  An attributional explanation of individual resistance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[50]  Bruce Thompson,et al.  The Importance of Structure Coefficients in Structural Equation Modeling Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 1997 .

[51]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies , 2005, The Journal of psychology.

[52]  David E. Monarchi,et al.  A research typology for object-oriented analysis and design , 1992, CACM.