Collaborative technologies in knowledge telework: an exploratory study

Abstract.  Knowledge workers in distributed work environments require substantial communication with colleagues and supervisors to perform their work activities, and collaborative technologies, like groupware, continue to improve the potential for such communication. This study investigates how an improvement in collaborative technology among a group of knowledge teleworkers impacts their communication patterns. The study focuses on one communication‐based work process: knowledge sharing. The research involves a 6‐month exploratory longitudinal case study of a group of teleworkers where a new groupware technology was implemented. The results indicate that while there are fewer instances of communication among group members after the technology is implemented, communication becomes more centralized around the district manager. These results suggest that increased collaborative technologies result in an adjustment between explicit and tacit knowledge sharing, as the availability of a centralized and updateable database reduces workgroup communications. However, consistent with structuration theory, telework group members do use communication technologies to address their most apparent needs and concerns. Other potential explanations and implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[2]  Rosann Webb Collins,et al.  Distributed Work Arrangements: A Research Framework , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[3]  Mary-Beth France Watson-Manheim,et al.  Support for Communication-Based Work Processes in Virtual Work , 2002 .

[4]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[5]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[6]  R. Nelson THE STRENGTH OF STRONG TIES: SOCIAL NETWORKS AND INTERGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1989 .

[7]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Developmental differences between distributed and face-to-face groups in electronically supported meeting environments: An exploratory investigation , 1995 .

[8]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[9]  Rosann Webb Collins,et al.  Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[11]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Information sharing as enabler for the virtual team: an experimental approach to assessing the role of electronic mail in disintermediation , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[13]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[14]  Jatinder N. D. Gupta,et al.  An exploratory study of groupware use in the knowledge management process , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[15]  H. Tsoukas The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[16]  David Coleman,et al.  Groupware: Collaborative Strategies for Corporate LANs and Intranets , 1997 .

[17]  Jen-Te Yang,et al.  Job-related knowledge sharing: comparative case studies , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[18]  Sridhar Narasimhan,et al.  Communication and Coordination in the Virtual Office , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Robert J. McQueen,et al.  Groupware support as a moderator of interdepartmental knowledge communication in process improvement groups: an action research study , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  Emergent communication networks , 1998 .

[21]  Liam Fahey,et al.  The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[22]  Ted Balaker The Quiet Success: Telecommuting's Impact on Transportation and Beyond , 2005 .

[23]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[24]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[25]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A review of the empirical research on telecommuting and directions for future research , 1998 .

[26]  H. Roberts,et al.  New Office Information Technology: Human and Managerial Implications. , 1989 .

[27]  Feng Li,et al.  Team-telework and the new geographical flexibilty for information workers , 1998 .

[28]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[29]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[31]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms , 1995 .

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Y. Baruch Teleworking: benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers , 2000 .

[35]  F. Belanger,et al.  Communication patterns in distributed work groups: a network analysis , 1999 .

[36]  N. Contractor,et al.  Communication networks and new media in organizations , 1990 .