Action research

or is bad research and is now defeated, but that qualitative approaches are now accepted as equal in value to quantitative approaches when used appropriately. Whether or not an approach is appropriate depends on the research topic and the research questions being addressed. A particular strength of qualitative methods is their value in explaining what goes on in organizations. Here, we want to celebrate and recommend action research, because this particular qualitative research method is unique in the way it associates research and practice, so research informs practice and practice informs research synergistically. Action research combines theory and practice (and researchers and practitioners) through change and reflection in an immediate problematic situation within a mutually acceptable ethical framework. Action research is an iterative process involving researchers and practitioners acting together on a particular cycle of activities, including problem diagnosis, action intervention, and reflective learning. We use information systems as the exemplar of how to benefit from action research methods, though software engineering and systems science, among others, could be used because their application domains also include real organizations. For developing information systems, action research has already made five key contributions:

[1]  F. Lau,et al.  A review on the use of action research in information systems studies , 1997 .

[2]  L. Stenhouse An introduction to curriculum research and development , 1975 .

[3]  Peter Twining,et al.  Learning Schools Programme: Developing Teachers’ Information Communication Technology Competence In The Support Of Learning , 1999 .

[4]  Enid Mumford,et al.  JOB SATISFACTION: A METHOD OF ANALYSIS , 1972 .

[5]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Bridget Somekh,et al.  The Contribution of Action Research to Development in Social Endeavours: a position paper on action research methodology , 1995 .

[7]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  K. Lewin Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[10]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[11]  D. Hargreaves,et al.  A Capital Theory of School Effectiveness and Improvement , 2001 .

[12]  Jean McNiff,et al.  You and your action research project , 1988 .

[13]  Christopher Day,et al.  Teachers in the Twenty-first Century: Time to renew the vision , 2000 .

[14]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..

[15]  Peter Woods,et al.  Testing Teachers: The effect of school inspections on primary teachers , 1998 .

[16]  Ismat Abdal-Haqq,et al.  Professionalizing Teaching: Is There a Role for Professional Development Schools? ERIC Digest. , 1992 .

[17]  John Elliott,et al.  Action research for educational change , 1991 .

[18]  J. R. G. Wood,et al.  A further exploration into information systems development: the evolution of Multiview2 , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[19]  A. Hargreaves Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning , 2000 .