Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem.

Three studies were conducted to test the hypothesis that judgments of average females' attractiveness or dating desirability will be adversely affected by exposing judges to extremely attractive prior stimuli (i.e., judgments will show a "contrast effect"). Study 1 was a field study in which male dormitory residents watching a popular TV show, whose main characters are three strikingly attractive females, were asked to rate a photo of an average female (described as a potential blind date for another dorm resident). These subjects rated the target female as significantly less attractive than did a comparable control group. Two other studies demonstrated analogous effects in a more controlled laboratory setting. In addition, the third study indicated a direct effect of informational social influence on physical attractiveness judgments. Implications are discussed, with particular attention to mass media impact.

[1]  B. Gillen,et al.  Physical Attractiveness , 1981 .

[2]  M. Snyder,et al.  Reconstructing the Past: Some Cognitive Consequences of Person Perception , 1978 .

[3]  M. Snyder.  On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes. , 1977 .

[4]  A. Gross,et al.  What is good is beautiful. , 1977 .

[5]  John P. Sheposh,et al.  Beauty or Brains: Which Image for Your Mate? , 1977 .

[6]  K. Dion,et al.  The Incentive Value of Physical Attractiveness for Young Children , 1976 .

[7]  T. Ostrom,et al.  Contrast effects in impression formation. , 1976 .

[8]  A. Pepitone,et al.  Contrast effects in judgments of crime severity and the punishment of criminal violators. , 1976 .

[9]  N. Anderson.  On the role of context effects in psychophysical judgment. , 1975, Psychological review.

[10]  T. Huston.  Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction , 1974 .

[11]  M. G. Efran,et al.  The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. , 1974 .

[12]  D. S. Marshall,et al.  Human sexual behavior : variations in the ethnographic spectrum , 1972 .

[13]  J. Cross,et al.  Age, sex, race, and the perception of facial beauty. , 1971 .

[14]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Sexual arousal and heterosexual perception. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  G. William Walster,et al.  Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis☆ , 1971 .

[17]  D. Byrne,et al.  Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating. , 1970 .

[18]  H. Helson,et al.  Effects of duration of series and anchor-stimuli on judgments of perceived size. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[19]  R. Brislin,et al.  Dating and Physical Attractiveness: Replication , 1968, Psychological reports.

[20]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  A. Parducci.  Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[22]  W. Bevan,et al.  The anchor effect and the problem of relevance in the judgment of shape. , 1963, The Journal of general psychology.

[23]  D. Campbell,et al.  Separating perceptual and linguistic effects of context shifts upon absolute judgments. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  C I HOVLAND,et al.  Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[26]  J. O. Whittaker,et al.  A Repetition of Asch's “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgment” , 1957 .

[27]  R. Crutchfield.  Conformity and character. , 1955 .

[28]  D. R. Brown,et al.  Stimulus-similarity and the anchoring of subjective scales. , 1953, The American journal of psychology.

[29]  H. Guetzkow,et al.  Groups, Leadership, and Men , 1952 .

[30]  R. Heintz.  The effect of remote anchoring points upon the judgment of lifted weights. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  Douglas T. Kenrick,et al.  Interpersonal attraction in aversive environments: A problem for the classical conditioning paradigm? , 1979 .

[32]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Influence of Mass Media on Judgments of Physical Attractiveness: The People's Case Against Farrah Fawcett. , 1977 .

[33]  G. Levinger,et al.  5 – A Three-Level Approach to Attraction: Toward an Understanding of Pair Relatedness , 1974 .

[34]  A. Lott,et al.  8 – The Role of Reward in the Formation of Positive Interpersonal Attitudes , 1974 .

[35]  Gerald L. Clore,et al.  7 – A Reinforcement-Affect Model of Attraction , 1974 .

[36]  M. Appley,et al.  Adaptation-level theory : a symposium , 1971 .

[37]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level theory : an experimental and systematic approach to behavior , 1964 .

[38]  H. Helson,et al.  Adaptation-level theory , 1964 .

[39]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[40]  S. Asch.  Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[41]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  A study of some social factors in perception. , 1935 .