Investigation of In Vivo Targeting Kinetics of αvβ3-Specific Superparamagnetic Nanoprobes by Time-Resolved MRI

Nanoparticulate imaging probes have become an increasingly important arsenal in the visualization of molecular markers for early diagnosis and post-therapy assessment of diseases. Surface functionalization of these nanoparticles has led to the development of a variety of targeted nanoprobes for various imaging modalities (e.g. PET, MRI, optical). Despite these advances, detailed understanding of the nanoparticle targeting kinetics, particularly at the early time points immediately after injection, is still lacking. In this study, we report the combination of a T2*-weighted time-resolved-MRI (TR-MRI) method with ultra-sensitive superparamagnetic polymeric micelle (SPPM) nanoprobes to quantify the targeting kinetics of cyclic (RGDfK) (cRGD)-encoded SPPM to angiogenic endothelium in subcutaneous human tumor xenograft models in mice. TR-MRI analyses of the αvβ3-targeted and non-targeted SPPMs allowed for the subtraction of blood volume and extravascular signal components from the cRGD-SPPM data, resulting in a specific measurement of the accumulation kinetics of nanoprobes in lung, breast and brain cancer preclinical models. In all three models, αvβ3-specific accumulation of SPPM nanoprobes was observed in the first 5 mins after intravenous injection (first order rate constants were in the range of 0.22-0.24 min-1). Similar αvβ3-targeting kinetics was observed for cRGD-SPPM nanoprobes in different tumor xenograft models, consistent with the targeting of mouse angiogenic endothelium despite tumor inoculation from different human cancer cell lines. Results from this study offer new opportunities in the quantitative characterization of the targeting kinetics of cancer-specific nanoparticles to their intended biological targets in an intact animal, which provides fundamental insights on molecular recognition processes in vivo for further development of these nanoprobes.

[1]  Jeff W M Bulte,et al.  Iron oxide MR contrast agents for molecular and cellular imaging , 2004, NMR in biomedicine.

[2]  Klaas Nicolay,et al.  MR molecular imaging and fluorescence microscopy for identification of activated tumor endothelium using a bimodal lipidic nanoparticle , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[3]  Weibo Cai,et al.  Multimodality Molecular Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Philippe Robert,et al.  Recent advances in iron oxide nanocrystal technology for medical imaging. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[5]  J. Liu,et al.  Zinc ferrite nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents. , 2008, Chemical communications.

[6]  B. Rosen,et al.  Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  D. Maysinger,et al.  Cellular internalization of poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) diblock copolymer micelles. , 2002, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[8]  Baran D Sumer,et al.  In vivo angiogenesis imaging of solid tumors by αv β 3-targeted, dual-modality micellar nanoprobes , 2010, Experimental biology and medicine.

[9]  Jinwoo Cheon,et al.  Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging , 2007, Nature Medicine.

[10]  Wolfhard Semmler,et al.  Specific targeting of tumor angiogenesis by RGD-conjugated ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles using a clinical 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner. , 2007, Cancer research.

[11]  Jinming Gao,et al.  In vivo off-resonance saturation magnetic resonance imaging of alphavbeta3-targeted superparamagnetic nanoparticles. , 2009, Cancer research.

[12]  U. Nielsen,et al.  Antibody targeting of long-circulating lipidic nanoparticles does not increase tumor localization but does increase internalization in animal models. , 2006, Cancer research.

[13]  E. Ahrens,et al.  Theoretical MRI contrast model for exogenous T2 agents , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  P M Carpenter,et al.  Characterization of N‐ethyl‐N‐nitrosourea‐induced malignant and benign breast tumors in rats by using three MR contrast agents , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Hua Ai,et al.  Multifunctional polymeric micelles as cancer-targeted, MRI-ultrasensitive drug delivery systems. , 2006, Nano letters.

[16]  D. Maysinger,et al.  Cellular Internalization of Poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone) Diblock Copolymer Micelles , 2002 .

[17]  D. Jaillard,et al.  Folate-conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles for solid tumor targeting as potential specific magnetic hyperthermia mediators: synthesis, physicochemical characterization, and in vitro experiments. , 2005, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[18]  S. Nie,et al.  Nanotechnology applications in cancer. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[19]  Dmitri Artemov,et al.  MR molecular imaging of the Her‐2/neu receptor in breast cancer cells using targeted iron oxide nanoparticles , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  R E Jacobs,et al.  A model for MRI contrast enhancement using T1 agents. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  S. Caruthers,et al.  Three‐dimensional MR mapping of angiogenesis with α5β1(αvβ3)‐targeted theranostic nanoparticles in the MDA‐MB‐435 xenograft mouse model , 2008, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[22]  E. Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal,et al.  αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins control glioma cell response to ionising radiation through ILK and RhoB , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[23]  R. Weissleder,et al.  The transferrin receptor: a potential molecular imaging marker for human cancer. , 2003, Neoplasia.

[24]  Jinming Gao,et al.  Polymeric Nanomedicine for Cancer MR Imaging and Drug Delivery , 2009 .

[25]  L. Silengo,et al.  Quantification of the expression level of integrin receptor alpha(v)beta3 in cell lines and MR imaging with antibody-coated iron oxide particles. , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  FeCo/graphitic-shell nanocrystals as advanced magnetic-resonance-imaging and near-infrared agents , 2006, Nature materials.

[27]  Antony K. Chen,et al.  Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Probes for Molecular Imaging , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  S. Nie,et al.  A reexamination of active and passive tumor targeting by using rod-shaped gold nanocrystals and covalently conjugated peptide ligands. , 2010, ACS nano.

[29]  Jinwoo Cheon,et al.  Synergistically Integrated Nanoparticles as Multimodal Probes for Nanobiotechnology , 2009 .

[30]  L. Silengo,et al.  Quantification of the expression level of integrin receptor αvβ3 in cell lines and MR imaging with antibody‐coated iron oxide particles , 2006 .

[31]  J. Duerk,et al.  Magnetite‐Loaded Polymeric Micelles as Ultrasensitive Magnetic‐Resonance Probes , 2005 .

[32]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  Hao Zeng,et al.  Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[34]  G. Parker,et al.  DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.