The Impact of Positive Sagittal Balance in Adult Spinal Deformity

Study Design. This study is a retrospective review of 752 patients with adult spinal deformity enrolled in a multicenter prospective database in 2002 and 2003. Patients with positive sagittal balance (N = 352) were further evaluated regarding radiographic parameters and health status measures, including the Scoliosis Research Society patient questionnaire, MOS short form-12, and Oswestry Disability Index. Objectives. To examine patients with adult deformity with positive sagittal balance to define parameters within that group that might differentially predict clinical impact. Summary of Background Data. In a multicenter study of 298 adults with spinal deformity, positive sagittal balance was identified as the radiographic parameter most highly correlated with adverse health status outcomes. Methods. Radiographic evaluation was performed according to a standarized protocol for 36-inch standing radiographs. Magnitude of positive sagittal balance and regional sagittal Cobb angle measures were recorded. Statistical correlation between radiographic parameters and health status measures were performed. Potentially confounding variables were assessed. Results. Positive sagittal balance was identified in 352 patients. The C7 plumb line deviation ranged from 1 to 271 mm. All measures of health status showed significantly poorer scores as C7 plumb line deviation increased. Patients with relative kyphosis in the lumbar region had significantly more disability than patients with normal or lordotic lumbar sagittal Cobb measures. Conclusions. This study shows that although even mildly positive sagittal balance is somewhat detrimental, severity of symptoms increases in a linear fashion with progressive sagittal imbalance. The results also show that kyphosis is more favorable in the upper thoracic region but very poorly tolerated in the lumbar spine.

[1]  R. Jackson,et al.  Coronal and Sagittal Plane Spinal Deformities Correlating with Back Pain and Pulmonary Function in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1989, Spine.

[2]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Scoliosis: A Health Assessment Analysis by SF-36 , 2003, Spine.

[3]  V. Deviren,et al.  Studies in the Modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in Adults: Validation, Reliability, and Discriminatory Capacity , 2003, Spine.

[4]  Kevin W. McEnery,et al.  An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment in 100 Asymptomatic Middle and Older Aged Volunteers , 1995, Spine.

[5]  P. Korovessis,et al.  Adult Idiopathic Lumbar Scoliosis: A Formula for Prediction of Progression and Review of the Literature , 1994, Spine.

[6]  V. Deviren,et al.  Management of Fixed Sagittal Plane Deformity: Outcome of Combined Anterior and Posterior Surgery , 2003, Spine.

[7]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Scoliosis: A Quantitative Radiographic and Clinical Analysis , 2002, Spine.

[8]  L. Lenke,et al.  Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). , 1999, Spine.

[9]  K. Wood,et al.  Sagittal Profile of the Elderly , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[10]  T. Trammell,et al.  Rotatory Olisthesis in Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1988, Spine.

[11]  R. Jackson,et al.  Incidence and Severity of Back Pain in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1983, Spine.

[12]  William Horton,et al.  Correlation of Radiographic Parameters and Clinical Symptoms in Adult Scoliosis , 2005, Spine.

[13]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Functional and Radiographic Outcomes After Surgery for Adult Scoliosis Using Third-Generation Instrumentation Techniques , 2003, Spine.

[14]  T. Albert,et al.  Health Outcome Assessment Before and After Adult Deformity Surgery: A Prospective Study , 1995, Spine.

[15]  Courtney W. Brown,et al.  Is There an Optimal Patient Stance for Obtaining a Lateral 36” Radiograph?: A Critical Comparison of Three Techniques , 2005, Spine.

[16]  R. Winter,et al.  Treatment of symptomatic flatback after spinal fusion. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  J. Pritchett,et al.  Degenerative Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis , 1993, Spine.

[18]  F. Schwab,et al.  Management of Flatback and Related Kyphotic Decompensation Syndromes , 1997, Spine.

[19]  Joanne M Wagner,et al.  Gait Changes as the Result of Deformity Reconstruction Surgery in a Group of Adults With Lumbar Scoliosis , 2003, Spine.

[20]  L. Lenke,et al.  The Validity of the SRS-22 Instrument in an Adult Spinal Deformity Population Compared With the Oswestry and SF-12: A Study of Response Distribution, Concurrent Validity, Internal Consistency, and Reliability , 2005, Spine.