Sentiment analysis of virtual brand communities for effective tribal marketing

Purpose By doing sentiment analysis of netnographic data, this study aims to explain the need to give special attention to negative sentiments expressed in virtual tribes, as they play a significant role in translating the informational mode of conversation to the relational mode of conversation. The overall purpose is to aid brand managers in the process of brand co-creation by articulating brand communication targeted to specific audiences based on their shared passions and interests. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a mixed-methods approach. The primary data were collected from two virtual brand communities through qualitative net-based ethnographic methods. Semantria Excel plug-in was used to categorize the extracted consumer statements based on positive, neutral and negative sentiments. Findings Managing the negative interactions in the virtual communities and relationship development with members through non-commercial conversations should be the two main priorities for effective brand management. Sentiment analysis specifically helps to identify pain points and consumer sentiments at each stage of the shopper journey. The findings of the study endorse the importance of offering and supporting communities as a valid marketing. Research limitations/implications This paper shows how systematic attention to user interactions on virtual brand communities can be used for tribal marketing, which in turn will impact the intangible aspects of the business, such as increasing brand value and loyalty. By engaging the consumers, the social ties among the target audience can be nurtured and strengthened. Originality/value This paper focuses on decoding their behavior by unpeeling the consumer statements rather than tangible aspects of the business, such as sales of products or services. It contributes to development of a theoretical framework that outlines how the interactions in virtual brand communities can aid in formulating the functional and communicational strategies for a brand.

[1]  K. Gwinner,et al.  A model of fan identification: antecedents and sponsorship outcomes , 2003 .

[2]  R. Kozinets Utopian Enterprise: Articulating the Meanings of Star Trek’s Culture of Consumption , 2001 .

[3]  V. Ramaswamy Leading the transformation to co‐creation of value , 2009 .

[4]  Ray Oldenburg,et al.  The Great Good Place , 1999 .

[5]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Tribal marketing: The tribalisation of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing , 2002 .

[6]  René Algesheimer,et al.  Interplay between Brand and Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Clubs , 2004 .

[7]  Thorsten Henning-Thurau Motive des Lesens von Kundenartikulationen im Internet: Theoretische und empirische Analyse , 2004 .

[8]  Daniele Dalli,et al.  Emotions that Drive Consumers Away from Brands: Measuring Negative Emotions Toward Brands and Their Behavioral Effects , 2012 .

[9]  P. Andersen Relationship marketing and brand involvement of professionals through web-enhanced brand communities: the case of Coloplast , 2005 .

[10]  Linda A. Macaulay,et al.  Individual trust and development of online business communities , 2007, Inf. Technol. People.

[11]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[12]  Alice H. Oh,et al.  Do You Feel What I Feel? Social Aspects of Emotions in Twitter Conversations , 2012, ICWSM.

[13]  Lerzan Aksoy,et al.  Undervalued or Overvalued Customers: Capturing Total Customer Engagement Value , 2010 .

[14]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Negative emotions boost user activity at BBC forum , 2010, 1011.5459.

[15]  H. Wilson,et al.  Wilson, H.: Engagement, Telepresence and Interactivity in Online Consumer Experience: Reconciling Scholastic and Managerial Perspectives. Journal of Business Research 63, 919-925 , 2010 .

[16]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[17]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  Virtual communities: A marketing perspective , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  R. Kozinets E-tribalized Marketing?: The Strategic Implications of Virtual Communities of Consumption , 1999 .

[19]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Critical perspectives on consumers’ role as ‘producers’: Broadening the debate on value co-creation in marketing processes , 2011 .

[20]  R. Kozinets The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities , 2002 .

[21]  R. Pieters,et al.  Angry customers don't come back, they get back: The experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services , 2003 .

[22]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Twitter mood predicts the stock market , 2010, J. Comput. Sci..

[23]  Y. Hsu Facebook as international eMarketing strategy of Taiwan hotels , 2012 .

[24]  H. Wilson,et al.  Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives , 2010 .

[25]  R. Brodie,et al.  Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis , 2013 .

[26]  Scales of observation A micro‐sociological epistemology of social science practice∗ , 1996 .

[27]  S. Nambisan,et al.  Interactions in virtual customer environments: Implications for product support and customer relationship management , 2007 .

[28]  R. Bagozzi On the Concept of Intentional Social Action in Consumer Behavior , 2000 .

[29]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  Beyond the Call of Duty: Why Customers Contribute to Firm-hosted Commercial Online Communities , 2007 .