A comparative study on life cycle analysis of molten carbon fuel cells and diesel engines for marine application

The study performed a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) plant for marine applications. The results are compared to a benchmark conventional diesel engine (DE) which operates as an auxiliary power generating unit. The LCA includes manufacturing of MCFC and DE, fuel supply, operation and decommissioning stages of the system's life cycle. As a new technology in its very early stages of commercialisation, some detailed data for the FC systems are not available. In order to overcome this problem, a series of scenario analysis has also been performed to evaluate the effect of various factors on the overall impact, such as change in power load factors and effect of recycling credit at the end of life cycle. Environmental benefits from fuel cell operation are maximised with the use of hydrogen as an input fuel. For the manufacturing stage of the life cycle, input material and process energy required for fuel cell stack assemblies and balance-of-plants (BOP) represent a bigger impact than that of conventional benchmark mainly due to special materials used in the stack and the weights of the BOP components. Additionally, recovering valuable materials through re-use or re-cycle will reduce the overall environmental burden of the system over its life cycle.

[1]  Clive A. Randall,et al.  Fabrication of Dense Zirconia Electrolyte Films for Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cells by Electrophoretic Deposition , 2001 .

[2]  Nigel P. Brandon,et al.  The environmental impact of manufacturing planar and tubular solid oxide fuel cells , 2001 .

[3]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis , 1998 .

[4]  Hai-Soo Chun,et al.  Sintering characteristics of a porous Ni/Ni3Al anode for molten carbonate fuel cells , 1999 .

[5]  Loey A. Salam,et al.  Optimisation of thermoelectric green tape characteristics made by the tape casting method , 2000 .

[6]  Fei Li,et al.  Optimization of non-aqueous nickel slips for manufacture of MCFC electrodes by tape casting method , 2002 .

[7]  A. A. Jensen.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) : a guide to approaches, experiences and information sources , 1998 .

[8]  Umberto Desideri,et al.  LCA of a molten carbonate fuel cell system , 2004 .

[9]  P. K. Tewari,et al.  Development of alpha lithium aluminate matrix for molten carbonate fuel cell , 2002 .

[10]  Hiroshi Morita,et al.  Performance analysis of molten carbonate fuel cell using a Li/Na electrolyte , 2002 .

[11]  Roberto Bove,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Stack , 2003 .

[12]  Nigel P. Brandon,et al.  Impact of the European Union vehicle waste directive on end-of-life options for polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2002 .

[13]  D. S. Erickson.  Low cost MCFC anodes , 1996 .

[14]  Barbara Bosio,et al.  Industrial experience on the development of the molten carbonate fuel cell technology , 1998 .

[15]  S. Abdel-Khalik,et al.  Modeling the transport processes within multichannel molten carbonate fuel cells , 2003 .

[16]  Makio Naito,et al.  Synthesis of CoO/Ni composite powders for molten carbonate fuel cells , 2001 .

[17]  Mohammad Farooque,et al.  Status of Carbonate Fuel Cell Materials , 1995, ECS Transactions.