Studies of Integration Readiness Levels: Case Shared Maritime Situational Awareness System

The research question of this study is: How Integration Readiness Level (IRL) metrics can be understood and realized in the domain of border control information systems. The study address to the IRL metrics and their definition, criteria, references, and questionnaires for validation of border control information systems in case of the shared maritime situational awareness system. The target of study is in improvements of ways for acceptance, operational validation, risk assessment, and development of sharing mechanisms and integration of information systems and border control information interactions and collaboration concepts in Finnish national and European border control domains.

[1]  Tina Blegind Jensen,et al.  Building nation-wide information infrastructures in healthcare through modular implementation strategies , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Robert Winter.  Interview with Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr. on “Toward a Broader Vision of IS Research” , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[3]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[4]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[5]  Brian J. Sauser,et al.  Integration maturity metrics: Development of an integration readiness level , 2010, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[6]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[7]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[8]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  C. Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  Dejan S. Milojicic,et al.  Networking , 2012, ATZelektronik worldwide.

[12]  Ricardo Pineda,et al.  Integration, Verification, Validation, Test, and Evaluation (IVVT&E) Framework for System of Systems (SoS) , 2013, Complex Adaptive Systems.

[13]  Ron J. Patton,et al.  Methods for fault diagnosis in rail vehicle traction and braking systems , 1995 .

[14]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  OSI Reference Model - The ISO Model of Architecture for Open Systems Interconnection , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[15]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Integration , 2016, Interactions.

[16]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[17]  Howard Eisner.  Systems Engineering: Building Successful Systems , 2011, Systems Engineering: Building Successful Systems.

[18]  Brian J. Sauser,et al.  A probabilistic approach to system maturity assessment , 2011, Syst. Eng..

[19]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[20]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[21]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[22]  Bruce S. Davie,et al.  Computer Networks: A Systems Approach , 1996 .

[23]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[24]  KA Thleen,et al.  Building Theories from Case Study , 2007 .

[25]  J. Gosby.  MEDIA REVIEWS: Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd Edition by A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Sage Publications, , 2000 .

[26]  Dinesh Verma,et al.  From TRL to SRL : The Concept of Systems Readiness Levels , 2006 .

[27]  Bruce S. Davie,et al.  Computer Networks: A System Approach , 1998, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[28]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Principles of canonical action research , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[29]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.