Advanced FPGA technology trend based on patent analysis with link mining

This paper provides the trend analysis of the technology development on FPGA with Machine Learning based on the public information. In recent years, demands for the computing power are expanding due to reform of industrial structure typified by the Industry 4.0 and explosive epidemic of IoT (Internet of Things) and AI (Artificial Intelligence). Due to the restriction of power supply, the challenge of edge device is to achieve a good balance between the performance and the power consumption. GPU is not suitable for embedding to the edge devices due to high power consumption and heat generation. On the other hand, the devices using only CPU do not satisfy required performance. For the above condition, FPGA has drawn attention as CPU accelerator. Xilinx and Intel (former Altera) are FPGA suppliers. Hence, it is important to grasp their technology development trends for conducting business. In this paper, we reveal the technical development trend of the target companies from the patent information with the Machine Learning. Knowledge extraction from the patent information has been made so far, since the conventional patent analysis methods depend on the personal heuristic knowledge. It was hard to extract the technological structure from the amount of the target classifier. Thus, we are focusing on classification codes in the patent and Link Mining method is employed as the analytical method. Link Mining is aiming to abstract the elements and their relations in focus object into the nodes and the edges to search for the structural features. We analyze the patent information submitted from the three companies above. The graphs consist of the classification codes of the patents of every 6 months which are made for revealing the patents' technology structure. With the proposed method, we were succeeded in revealing the companies' focused technology areas, their technological transition, and their differences and common points from the results of extracting the graphs' features.

[1]  Muguruma Masamichi The usefulness of patent forward citation analysis and its practical examples. , 2006 .

[2]  Lise Getoor,et al.  Link mining: a new data mining challenge , 2003, SKDD.

[3]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[4]  Masao Yamamoto,et al.  A Journal Paper Filtering Using the Profile Revised by Patent Document Information , 2010 .

[5]  佳之 山下 テキストマイニング技術の特許分析・特許検索実務への活用 特許検索・分析サービス「パテント・インテグレーション」 , 2010 .

[6]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  The Innovation Algorithm:TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity , 1999 .

[7]  Hiroshi Kawakami,et al.  発明的問題解決理論TRIZを援用した不便益発想支援システム;発明的問題解決理論TRIZを援用した不便益発想支援システム;Idea Generation Support System for Implementing Benefit of Inconvenience by Employing the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving , 2013 .

[8]  Ishizuka Mitsuru,et al.  Link Mining from Networks of Academic Papers , 2007 .

[9]  Masao Yamamoto,et al.  A Journal Paper Filtering Using the Multiple Information , 2011 .

[10]  Kazunari Tanaka Multi - viewpoint clustering of patent documents , 2004 .

[11]  Robert M. Rosenzweig The hazards of recombinant DNA: Stanford's patent application Natural selection effects , 1977 .

[12]  Francis Narin,et al.  Citation rates to technologically important patents , 1981 .

[13]  Hedvah L. Shuchman,et al.  Engineers who patent: Data from a recent survey of American bench engineers , 1983 .

[14]  Kazuya Shide,et al.  THE SHIFT OF POSITIONING OF JAPANESE GENERAL CONTRACTORS' R&D ACTIVITIES , 2011 .

[15]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .