The impact of reconstruction algorithms and time of flight information on PET/CT image quality
暂无分享,去创建一个
Alen Suljic | Petra Tomse | Luka Jensterle | Damijan Skrk | P. Tomše | Luka Jensterle | D. Skrk | Alen Suljič
[1] W. Moses. Recent Advances and Future Advances in Time-of-Flight PET. , 2006, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment.
[2] Michael E Casey,et al. PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[3] R. Dolenec,et al. Study of TOF PET using Cherenkov light , 2011 .
[4] V. Rangarajan,et al. Essential nuclear medicine physics , 2007, Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging.
[5] D. Townsend,et al. An Assessment of the Impact of Incorporating Time-of-Flight Information into Clinical PET/CT Imaging , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[6] Thomas L. Morgan,et al. Quality Assurance for PET and PET/CT Systems , 2012 .
[7] Koichiro Abe,et al. Improvement in PET/CT Image Quality with a Combination of Point-Spread Function and Time-of-Flight in Relation to Reconstruction Parameters , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[8] P. Lecumberri,et al. Evaluation of spatial resolution of a PET scanner through the simulation and experimental measurement of the recovery coefficient , 2010, Comput. Biol. Medicine.
[9] Arne Skretting. A method for on-site measurements of the effective spatial resolution in PET image volumes reconstructed with OSEM and Gaussian post-filters. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.
[10] S. Cherry,et al. Physics in Nuclear Medicine , 2004 .
[11] Martin A Lodge,et al. A Practical, Automated Quality Assurance Method for Measuring Spatial Resolution in PET , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[12] R. Boellaard,et al. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[13] Gopal B. Saha,et al. Basics of PET Imaging , 2005 .
[14] Evaluation of the HD and HD+TOF reconstructions for Siemens' Biograph-mCT TOF PET scanner , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
[15] E Prieto,et al. [Contribution of time of flight and point spread function modeling to the performance characteristics of the PET/CT Biograph mCT scanner]. , 2013, Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular.
[16] D. Townsend,et al. Impact of Time-of-Flight on PET Tumor Detection , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[17] M. Conti. Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[18] T. Budinger. Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[19] J. Martí-Climent,et al. Contribution of time of flight and point spread function modeling to the performance characteristics of the PET/CT Biograph mCT scanner ☆ , 2013 .
[20] Maurizio Conti,et al. State of the art and challenges of time-of-flight PET. , 2009, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.
[21] Suleman Surti,et al. Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[22] D. Townsend,et al. Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.