Model-based estimation of drug use prevalence using item count data

The item count (IC) method for estimating the prevalence of sensitive behaviors was applied to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) to estimate the prevalence of past year cocaine use. Despite considerable effort and research to refine and adapt the IC method to this survey, the method failed to produce estimates that were any larger than the estimates based on self-reports. Further analysis indicated the problem to be measurement error in the IC responses. To address the problem, a new model-based estimator was proposed to correct the IC estimates for measurement error and produce less biased prevalence estimates. The model combines the IC data, replicated measurements of the IC items, and responses to the cocaine use question to obtain estimates of the classification error in the observed data. The data were treated as fallible indicators of (latent) true values and traditional latent class analysis assumptions were made to obtain an identifiable model. The resulting estimates of the cocaine use prevalence were approximately 43 percent larger than the self-report only estimates and the estimated underreporting rates were consistent with those estimated from other studies of drug use underreporting.

[1]  B Gropper,et al.  Concordance of three measures of cocaine use in an arrestee population: hair, urine, and self-report. , 1991, Journal of psychoactive drugs.

[2]  L Harrison,et al.  The validity of self-reported drug use in survey research: an overview and critique of research methods. , 1997, NIDA research monograph.

[3]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables when some variables are posterior to others: a modified path analysis approach , 1973 .

[4]  C. Mitchell Dayton,et al.  Model Selection Information Criteria for Non-Nested Latent Class Models , 1997 .

[5]  M. Fendrich,et al.  The validity of drug use reports from juvenile arrestees. , 1994, The International journal of the addictions.

[6]  Blossom H. Patterson,et al.  Latent Class Analysis of Complex Sample Survey Data , 2002 .

[7]  Charles F Turner,et al.  AUDIO AND VIDEO COMPUTER-ASSISTED SELF INTERVIEWING: Preliminary Tests of New Technologies for Data Collection. , 1994, Journal of official statistics.

[8]  D Wright,et al.  The use of external data sources and ratio estimation to improve estimates of hardcore drug use from the NHSDA. , 1997, NIDA research monograph.

[9]  Judith T. Lessler,et al.  Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use; DHHS Pub. No. (ADM) 92-1929; Technical paper 8 , 1991 .

[10]  Lana D. Harrison,et al.  The Validity of Self-Reported Data on Drug Use , 1995 .

[11]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[12]  C. Mitchell Dayton,et al.  A scaling model with response errors and intrinsically unscalable respondents , 1980 .

[13]  S. Haberman Analysis of qualitative data , 1978 .

[14]  Richard Goldstein Latent Class and Discrete Latent Trait Models: Similarities and Differences , 1998 .

[15]  Mode Effects on Substance Use Measures: Comparison of 1999 CAI and PAPI , 2002 .

[16]  R. Fisher Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning , 1993 .

[17]  Paul Biemer,et al.  A test of the item count methodology for estimating cocaine use prevalence , 2004 .

[18]  Michael D. Sinclair,et al.  On procedures for evaluating the effectiveness of reinterview survey methods : Application to labor force data , 1996 .

[19]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  Log-Linear Models for Event Histories , 1997 .

[20]  S. Walter,et al.  Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests. , 1980, Biometrics.