Understanding Implementation of Complex Interventions in Primary Care Teams

Background: The implementation of interventions to support practice change in primary care settings is complex. Pragmatic strategies, grounded in empiric data, are needed to navigate real-world challenges and unanticipated interactions with context that can impact implementation and outcomes. Objective: This article uses the example of the “5As Team” randomized control trial to explore implementation strategies to promote knowledge transfer, capacity building, and practice integration, and their interaction within the context of an interdisciplinary primary care team. Methods: We performed a qualitative evaluation of the implementation process of the 5As Team intervention study, a randomized control trial of a complex intervention in primary care. We conducted thematic analysis of field notes of intervention sessions, log books of the practice facilitation team members, and semistructured interviews with 29 interdisciplinary clinician participants. We used and further developed the Interactive Systems Framework for dissemination and implementation to interpret and structure findings. Results: Three themes emerged that illuminate interactions between implementation processes, context, and outcomes: (1) facilitating team communication supported collective and individual sense-making and adoption of the innovation, (2) iterative evaluation of the implementation process and real-time feedback-driven adaptions of the intervention proved crucial for sustainable, context-appropriate intervention impact, (3) stakeholder engagement led to both knowledge exchange that contributes to local problem solving and to shaping a clinical context that is supportive to practice change. Conclusion: Our findings contribute pragmatic strategies that can help practitioners and researchers to navigate interactions between context, intervention, and implementation factors to increase implementation success. We further developed an implementation framework that includes sustained engagement with stakeholders, facilitation of team sense-making, and dynamic evaluation and intervention design as integral parts of complex intervention implementation. Trial registration: NCT01967797. 18 October 2013

[1]  D. Campbell-Scherer,et al.  5As Team obesity intervention in primary care: development and evaluation of shared decision‐making weight management tools , 2015, Clinical obesity.

[2]  David J. Will.  A realist theory of science , 1981, Medical History.

[3]  Carl Heneghan,et al.  What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Andrea Cornwall,et al.  What is participatory research? , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[5]  W. Silverman,et al.  Bridging Research and Practice , 2004 .

[6]  T. Hoffmann,et al.  Reporting and Replicating Trials of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: Do We Know What the Researchers Actually Did? , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[7]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[8]  E. Welsh,et al.  New Directions in Capacity Building: Incorporating Cultural Competence into the Interactive Systems Framework , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[9]  D. Campbell-Scherer,et al.  Missing an opportunity: the embedded nature of weight management in primary care , 2015, Clinical obesity.

[10]  C. Lyon,et al.  Practice Transformation Under the University of Colorado’s Primary Care Redesign Model , 2019, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[11]  Duncan C. Meyers,et al.  Using a Training-of-Trainers Approach and Proactive Technical Assistance to Bring Evidence Based Programs to Scale: An Operationalization of the Interactive Systems Framework’s Support System , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[12]  S. Buka,et al.  The Interactive Systems Framework Applied to the Strategic Prevention Framework: The Rhode Island Experience , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[13]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[14]  P. Nilsen.  Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks , 2015, Implementation Science.

[15]  Clyde B. Schechter,et al.  Using the Interactive Systems Framework to Support a Quality Improvement Approach to Dissemination of Evidence-Based Strategies to Promote Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Planning a Comprehensive Dynamic Trial , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[16]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[17]  R. Mccall,et al.  Blending Theory with Practice: Implementing Kindergarten Transition Using the Interactive Systems Framework , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[18]  Arya M. Sharma,et al.  The 5As team intervention: bridging the knowledge gap in obesity management among primary care practitioners , 2015, BMC Research Notes.

[19]  David Bamford,et al.  The NIHR collaboration for leadership in applied health research and care (CLAHRC) for greater manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[20]  Judy M. Berkowitz,et al.  Applying the Interactive Systems Framework to the Dissemination and Adoption of National and State Recommendations for Hypertension , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[21]  Mark Petticrew,et al.  When are complex interventions 'complex'? When are simple interventions 'simple'? , 2011, European journal of public health.

[22]  Budd L. Hall,et al.  From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research , 1992 .

[23]  Heather C Kaplan,et al.  The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature. , 2010, The Milbank quarterly.

[24]  R. Puddy,et al.  A Comparison of the Interactive Systems Framework (ISF) for Dissemination and Implementation and the CDC Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention’s Research-to-Practice Model for Behavioral Interventions , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[25]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Call to improve transparency of trials of non-regulated interventions , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  S. Straus,et al.  Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[27]  C. May,et al.  Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory , 2009 .

[28]  Tracy Finch,et al.  Implementation, context and complexity , 2016, Implementation Science.

[29]  A. Wandersman,et al.  Advances in Bridging Research and Practice: Introduction to the Second Special Issue on the Interactive System Framework for Dissemination and Implementation , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[30]  David A. Chambers,et al.  The Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation: Enhancing the Opportunity for Implementation Science , 2012, American Journal of Community Psychology.

[31]  Jennifer Duffy,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Prevention Research and Practice: The Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation , 2008, American journal of community psychology.

[32]  Andrée le May,et al.  Practice-based Evidence for Healthcare: Clinical Mindlines , 2010 .

[33]  M. Brodowski,et al.  Translating Evidence-Based Policy to Practice: A Multilevel Partnership Using the Interactive Systems Framework , 2013 .

[34]  D. Campbell-Scherer,et al.  Challenges in interdisciplinary weight management in primary care: lessons learned from the 5As Team study† , 2016, Clinical obesity.

[35]  M. Tonelli,et al.  Recommendations for prevention of weight gain and use of behavioural and pharmacologic interventions to manage overweight and obesity in adults in primary care , 2015, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[36]  Abraham Wandersman,et al.  The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[37]  Richard M. Cullen,et al.  Implementation of the BETTER 2 program: a qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators of a novel way to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care , 2016, Implementation Science.

[38]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  10 years of mindlines: a systematic review and commentary , 2015, Implementation Science.

[39]  Arya M. Sharma,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of the 5As framework of obesity management in primary care: design of the 5As Team (5AsT) randomized control trial , 2014, Implementation Science.

[40]  Arya M. Sharma,et al.  Impact of the 5As Team study on clinical practice in primary care obesity management: a qualitative study. , 2017, CMAJ open.

[41]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[42]  C. Dowrick,et al.  Complex interventions , 2022, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

[43]  N. Wallerstein,et al.  Community-based participatory research for health : from process to outcomes , 2008 .

[44]  D. Campbell-Scherer,et al.  Improving reporting and utility of evaluations of complex interventions , 2015, Evidence-Based Medicine.

[45]  Ross C. Brownson,et al.  A review of policy dissemination and implementation research funded by the National Institutes of Health, 2007–2014 , 2015, Implementation Science.

[46]  L. Caldwell,et al.  Using the Interactive Systems Framework in Understanding the Relation Between General Program Capacity and Implementation in Afterschool Settings , 2012, American Journal of Community Psychology.

[47]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Patchy ‘coherence’: using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC) , 2013, Implementation Science.

[48]  S. Shortell,et al.  Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[49]  David A Chambers,et al.  Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[50]  Shawna L. Mercer,et al.  Navigating the Road Ahead: Public Health Challenges and the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[51]  A. Langley,et al.  Explaining Diffusion Patterns for Complex Health Care Innovations , 2002, Health care management review.