A numerical study of tournament structure and seeding policy for the soccer World Cup Finals

Tournament outcome uncertainty depends on: the design of the tournament; and the relative strengths of the competitors – the competitive balance. A tournament design comprises the arrangement of the individual matches, which we call the tournament structure, the seeding policy and the progression rules. In this paper, we investigate the effect of seeding policy for various tournament structures, while taking account of competitive balance. Our methodology uses tournament outcome uncertainty to consider the effect of seeding policy and other design changes. The tournament outcome uncertainty is measured using the tournament outcome characteristic which is the probability Pq,R that a team in the top 100q pre-tournament rank percentile progresses forward from round R, for all q and R. We use Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the values of this metric. We find that, in general, seeding favours stronger competitors, but that the degree of favouritism varies with the type of seeding. Reseeding after each round favours the strong to the greatest extent. The ideas in the paper are illustrated using the soccer World Cup Finals tournament.

[1]  Mark E. Glickman,et al.  Bayesian locally optimal design of knockout tournaments , 2008 .

[2]  É. Marchand.  On the comparison between standard and random knockout tournaments , 2002 .

[3]  Ruud H. Koning,et al.  A simulation model for football championships , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Dries R. Goossens,et al.  Comparing league formats with respect to match importance in Belgian football , 2012, Ann. Oper. Res..

[5]  Samuel S. Wu,et al.  A Comparison of Potential Playoff Systems for NCAA I-A Football , 2006 .

[6]  Ian G. McHale,et al.  Statistical analysis of the effectiveness of the FIFA World Rankings , 2007 .

[7]  T Mcgarry,et al.  Efficacy of traditional sport tournament structures , 1997 .

[8]  Ruud H. Koning,et al.  Competitive balance in Dutch soccer , 1999 .

[9]  David F. Percy.  A mathematical analysis of badminton scoring systems , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  Philip A. Scarf,et al.  A numerical study of designs for sporting contests , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Ian G. McHale,et al.  Modelling the dependence of goals scored by opposing teams in international soccer matches , 2011 .

[12]  M. Maher.  Modelling association football scores , 1982 .

[13]  Alan J. Lee.  Modeling Scores in the Premier League: Is Manchester United Really the Best? , 1997 .

[14]  Allen J. Schwenk,et al.  What Is the Correct Way to Seed a Knockout Tournament? , 2000, Am. Math. Mon..

[15]  Ruud H. Koning,et al.  Balance in competition in Dutch soccer , 2000 .

[16]  D. Karlis,et al.  Analysis of sports data by using bivariate Poisson models , 2003 .

[17]  Frank K. Hwang,et al.  New Concepts in Seeding Knockout Tournaments , 1982 .

[18]  S. Coles,et al.  Modelling Association Football Scores and Inefficiencies in the Football Betting Market , 1997 .

[19]  Håvard Rue,et al.  Prediction and retrospective analysis of soccer matches in a league , 2000 .