Methodology for enhancing reliability of predictive project schedules in construction

Construction projects consist in providing new built facilities as well as in maintaining the existing building stock. Reliability engineering in construction encompasses all stages of the structure’s life cycle from the earliest concept of the project to decommissioning. The project planning and design stages are aimed at selecting or creating technical and organisational solutions to assure that the built facility meets the sponsor’s and the user’s requirements; these requirements regulate also the construction process. The result of planning the construction process should be a reliable schedule – immune to disruptive effects of random occurrences, so assuring high probability of the actual processes meeting their predefined deadlines. A practical method of scheduling construction projects should enable the planner to generate schedules resistant to random occurrences, making them reliable so that the users can meet deadlines. The paper presents a proactive methodology for generating construction schedules of enhanced reliability. The methodology covers two fundamental stages. The first stage is a construction duration risk assessment based on a multi-attribute evaluation of operating conditions. The second stage is the allocation of time buffers. An original methodology supporting decisions at each stage is put forward, namely a methodology for evaluating process duration risk level, defining significance of operating conditions, estimating dispersion of process durations, and defining criticality of processes in the schedule. The author proposes a set of measures of schedule robustness to serve as surrogate criteria in the schedule instability cost minimization problem and buffer sizing. The proposed way of allowing for risk and uncertainty in creating reliable schedules is argued to be efficient in protecting the project completion date, as well as stage or even process start dates, against disruptions.

[1]  Oleg Kapliński Guest editorial: Planning instruments in construction management , 2008 .

[2]  Wojciech Bożejko,et al.  Applying metaheuristic strategies in construction projects management , 2012 .

[3]  Mohamed Haouari,et al.  A bi-objective model for robust resource-constrained project scheduling , 2005 .

[4]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  Proactive heuristic procedures for robust project scheduling: An experimental analysis , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  C. Williams,et al.  Risk management and insurance , 1976 .

[6]  Wei-Chih Wang Impact of soft logic on the probabilistic duration of construction projects , 2005 .

[7]  Jingwen Zhang,et al.  A bi-objective model for robust resource-constrained project scheduling problem with random activity durations , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control.

[8]  Krzysztof Schabowicz,et al.  Estimation of earthworks execution time cost by means of artificial neural networks , 2010 .

[9]  Nashwan Dawood Estimating project and activity duration: a risk management approach using network analysis , 1998 .

[10]  David Johnson,et al.  The triangular distribution as a proxy for the beta distribution in risk analysis , 1997 .

[11]  M. Połoński,et al.  Impact of Baseline Terms on the Course of Critical Paths and Time Buffers in the Modified Goldratt’s Method , 2013 .

[12]  Krzysztof Schabowicz,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks in predicting earthmoving machinery effectiveness ratios , 2008 .

[13]  Sławomir Biruk,et al.  Using of fuzzy AHP for assessing risk of construction projects , 2011 .

[14]  Margaret M. Wiecek,et al.  A review of different perspectives on uncertainty and risk and an alternative modeling paradigm , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Sławomir Biruk,et al.  Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment , 2010 .

[16]  Athanasios P. Chassiakos,et al.  Project time-cost analysis under generalised precedence relations , 2002 .

[17]  Wojciech Bożejko,et al.  Solving resource-constrained construction scheduling problems with overlaps by metaheuristic , 2014 .

[18]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Construction Risk Modelling and Assessment: Insights from a Literature Review , 2011 .

[19]  Dariusz Skorupka,et al.  Identification and Initial Risk Assessment of Construction Projects in Poland , 2008 .

[20]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  The Price of Robustness , 2004, Oper. Res..

[21]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  The use of buffers in project management: The trade-off between stability and makespan , 2004 .

[22]  James L. Athearn,et al.  Risk Management and Insurance , 2003, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering.

[23]  Brenda McCabe,et al.  Evaluating Risk in Construction–Schedule Model (ERIC–S): Construction Schedule Risk Model , 2003 .

[24]  Sławomir Biruk,et al.  THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT RISK ASSESSMENT , 2011 .

[25]  Sławomir Biruk,et al.  THE METHOD FOR IMPROVING STABILITY OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SCHEDULES THROUGH BUFFER ALLOCATION / STATYBOS VYKDYMO GRAFIKO STABILUMO UŽTIKRINIMAS PASKIRSTANT LAIKO REZERVUS , 2011 .

[26]  Richard L. Tucker,et al.  Multiskilled Labor Utilization Strategies in Construction , 1998 .

[27]  Mieczysław Połoński,et al.  The influence of stoppages on productivity during construction of water supply and sewage systems , 2014 .

[28]  Willy Herroelen,et al.  A Methodology for Integrated Risk Management and Proactive Scheduling of Construction Projects , 2008 .

[29]  Karel Skokan Technological and Economic Development of Economy , 2011 .

[30]  Tarek Hegazy,et al.  ALGORITHM FOR SCHEDULING WITH MULTISKILLED CONSTRAINED RESOURCES , 2000 .