KnowMe and ShareMe: understanding automatically discovered personality traits from social media and user sharing preferences

There is much recent work on using the digital footprints left by people on social media to predict personal traits and gain a deeper understanding of individuals. Due to the veracity of social media, imperfections in prediction algorithms, and the sensitive nature of one's personal traits, much research is still needed to better understand the effectiveness of this line of work, including users' preferences of sharing their computationally derived traits. In this paper, we report a two- part study involving 256 participants, which (1) examines the feasibility and effectiveness of automatically deriving three types of personality traits from Twitter, including Big 5 personality, basic human values, and fundamental needs, and (2) investigates users' opinions of using and sharing these traits. Our findings show there is a potential feasibility of automatically deriving one's personality traits from social media with various factors impacting the accuracy of models. The results also indicate over 61.5% users are willing to share their derived traits in the workplace and that a number of factors significantly influence their sharing preferences. Since our findings demonstrate the feasibility of automatically inferring a user's personal traits from social media, we discuss their implications for designing a new generation of privacy-preserving, hyper-personalized systems.

[1]  L. R. Goldberg THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[2]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  A study of preferences for sharing and privacy , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-Based Services , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Design for Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Environments , 1993, ECSCW.

[5]  Ana-Maria Popescu,et al.  A Machine Learning Approach to Twitter User Classification , 2011, ICWSM.

[6]  Oliver Brdiczka,et al.  Understanding Email Writers: Personality Prediction from Email Messages , 2013, UMAP.

[7]  Heng Xu,et al.  Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2011, MIS Q..

[8]  Jeffrey Nichols,et al.  Recommending targeted strangers from whom to solicit information on social media , 2013, IUI '13.

[9]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[10]  Abraham P. Sperling,et al.  14 – MOTIVATION AND PERSONALITY , 1982 .

[11]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Using Linguistic Cues for the Automatic Recognition of Personality in Conversation and Text , 2007, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[12]  P. Robert,et al.  A Unifying Tool for Linear Multivariate Statistical Methods: The RV‐Coefficient , 1976 .

[13]  Louise Barkhuus The mismeasurement of privacy: using contextual integrity to reconsider privacy in HCI , 2012, CHI.

[14]  Manju K. Ahuja,et al.  Early and Late Adopters of IT Innovations: Extensions to Innovation Diffusion Theory , 1998 .

[15]  Ninghui Li,et al.  End-User Privacy in Human–Computer Interaction , 2009 .

[16]  D. Funder The Personality Puzzle , 1996 .

[17]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[18]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media , 2013, CHI.

[19]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Privacy in Context - Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life , 2009 .

[20]  H. Jeff Smith,et al.  Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals' Concerns About Organizational Practices , 1996, MIS Q..

[21]  Huahai Yang,et al.  Identifying User Needs from Social Media , 2013 .

[22]  Eben M. Haber,et al.  OpinionBlocks: A Crowd-Powered, Self-improving Interactive Visual Analytic System for Understanding Opinion Text , 2013, INTERACT.

[23]  Jeffrey Nichols,et al.  Understanding individuals' personal values from social media word use , 2014, CSCW.

[24]  Yunan Chen,et al.  Using contextual integrity to examine interpersonal information boundary on social network sites , 2013, CHI.

[25]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Predicting personality with social media , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  Heng Xu,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[28]  Elina Eriksson,et al.  The secret life of a persona: when the personal becomes private , 2013, CHI.

[29]  Jason I. Hong,et al.  End-User Privacy in Human-Computer Interaction , 2007, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[30]  Norman A. Johnson,et al.  Personality traits and concern for privacy: an empirical study in the context of location-based services , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Predicting Personality from Twitter , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[32]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  H. Triandis,et al.  Cultural influences on personality. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  Tal Yarkoni Personality in 100,000 Words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. , 2010, Journal of research in personality.

[35]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Preference-based location sharing: are more privacy options really better? , 2013, CHI.