A combined TOPSIS-AHP-method-based approach for non-traditional machining processes selection

With the introduction and increased use of newer and harder materials such as titanium, stainless steel, high-strength temperature-resistant (HSTR) alloys, fibre-reinforced composites, and ceramics in the aerospace, nuclear, missile, turbine, automobile, tool, and die-making industries, a different class of machining processes has emerged. Instead of employing the conventional cutting tools, these non-traditional machining (NTM) processes use energy in its direct form to remove materials from the workpiece. Selection of the most suitable NTM process for machining a shape feature on a given work material requires consideration of several factors. A combined method using the ‘technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution’ (TOPSIS) and an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is proposed to select the most appropriate NTM process for a specific work material and shape feature combination, while taking into account different attributes affecting the NTM process selection decision. This paper also includes the design and development of a TOPSIS-AHP-method-based expert system that can automate the decision-making process with the help of a graphical user interface and visual aids. The expert system not only segregates the acceptable NTM processes from the list of the available processes, but also ranks them in decreasing order of preference. It also helps the user as a responsible guide to select the best NTM process by incorporating all the possible error-trapping mechanisms.

[1]  S. Mahmoodzadeh,et al.  Evaluate projects by using multiple criteria decision making techniques , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[2]  Taho Yang,et al.  Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem , 2007 .

[3]  Hung-Chang Liao,et al.  Using PCR-TOPSIS to optimise Taguchi's multi-response problem , 2003 .

[4]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives , 2007, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[5]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using a combined multiple attribute decision making method , 2008 .

[6]  T. Saaty Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2005 .

[7]  H. S. Byun,et al.  A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method , 2005 .

[8]  Vikrant Gupta,et al.  Coding, evaluation and selection of thermal power plants – A MADM approach , 2007 .

[9]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  Development of a multi-attribute selection procedure for non-traditional machining processes , 2003 .

[10]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Machinability evaluation of work materials using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method , 2006 .

[11]  Subir Kumar Saha,et al.  Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot , 2004 .

[12]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[13]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Design of an analytic-hierarchy-process-based expert system for non-traditional machining process selection , 2006 .

[14]  Hung-Cheng Chen,et al.  Optimization of multiple responses using principal component analysis and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution , 2005 .

[15]  Can Cogun Computer-aided system for selection of nontraditional machining operations , 1993 .

[16]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  QFD-based expert system for non-traditional machining processes selection , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[18]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[19]  BüyüközkanGülçin,et al.  Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives , 2007 .

[20]  M. Yurdakul *,et al.  Development of a performance measurement model for manufacturing companies using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches , 2005 .

[21]  João Paulo Davim,et al.  A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method , 2008 .

[22]  Can Cogun Computer-aided preliminary selection of nontraditional machining processes , 1994 .

[23]  J. McGeough Advanced Methods Of Machining , 1988 .