Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Thomas L Toth | D. DeLong | R. Nelson | S. Schindera | T. Toth | T. Yoshizumi | G. Toncheva | Terry T Yoshizumi | Sebastian T Schindera | Greta I Toncheva | Rendon C Nelson | Giao T Nguyen | David M DeLong
[1] T. Fukunaga,et al. Influences of age and sex on abdominal muscle and subcutaneous fat thickness , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.
[2] Greta Toncheva,et al. Effective Dose Determination Using an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor Technology for Clinical Adult Body Multidetector Array Computed Tomography Protocols , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[3] Thomas Flohr,et al. Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[4] Urinary stone disease: comparison of standard-dose and low-dose with 4D MDCT tube current modulation. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[5] Thomas L Toth,et al. Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. , 2004, Radiology.
[6] Greta Toncheva,et al. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study. , 2009, Academic radiology.
[7] A. Neville,et al. Early first trimester fetal dose estimation method in a multivendor study of 16- and 64-MDCT scanners and low-dose imaging protocols. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[8] Walter Huda,et al. PATIENT SIZE AND X-RAY TRANSMISSION IN BODY CT , 2004, Health physics.
[9] N Pierrat,et al. The relevance of image quality indices for dose optimization in abdominal multi-detector row CT in children: experimental assessment with pediatric phantoms , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.
[10] M. V. van Leeuwen,et al. A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols , 2001, European Radiology.
[11] C. McCollough,et al. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[12] R. Nelson,et al. Radiation dose for body CT protocols: variability of scanners at one institution. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[13] Thomas L Toth,et al. Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. , 2004, Radiology.
[14] Ambady Ramachandran,et al. Computed axial tomographic scan measurement of abdominal fat distribution and its correlation with anthropometry and insulin secretion in healthy Asian Indians. , 1997, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.
[15] M. Kalra,et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.
[16] B. Veysman. My two cents on radiation. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[17] M. Hiorns. Imaging of urinary tract lithiasis: who, when and how? , 2008, Pediatric Radiology.
[18] T. Mulkens,et al. Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. , 2005, Radiology.