Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate in a phantom study the effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS One or two 4-cm-thick circumferential layers of fat-equivalent material were added to the abdomen of an anthropomorphic phantom to simulate patients of three sizes: small (cross-sectional dimensions, 18 x 22 cm), average size (26 x 30 cm), and oversize (34 x 38 cm). Imaging was performed with a 64-MDCT scanner with combined z-axis and xy-axis tube current modulation according to two protocols: protocol A had a noise index of 12.5 H, and protocol B, 15.0 H. Radiation doses to three abdominal organs and the skin were assessed. Image noise also was measured. RESULTS Despite increasing patient size, the image noise measured was similar for protocol A (range, 11.7-12.2 H) and protocol B (range, 13.9-14.8 H) (p > 0.05). With the two protocols, in comparison with the dose of the small patient, the abdominal organ doses of the average-sized patient and the oversized patient increased 161.5-190.6%and 426.9-528.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). The skin dose increased as much as 268.6% for the average-sized patient and 816.3% for the oversized patient compared with the small patient (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Oversized patients undergoing abdominal MDCT with tube current modulation receive significantly higher doses than do small patients. The noise index needs to be adjusted to the body habitus to ensure dose efficiency.

[1]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Influences of age and sex on abdominal muscle and subcutaneous fat thickness , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[2]  Greta Toncheva,et al.  Effective Dose Determination Using an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor Technology for Clinical Adult Body Multidetector Array Computed Tomography Protocols , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Urinary stone disease: comparison of standard-dose and low-dose with 4D MDCT tube current modulation. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. , 2004, Radiology.

[6]  Greta Toncheva,et al.  Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[7]  A. Neville,et al.  Early first trimester fetal dose estimation method in a multivendor study of 16- and 64-MDCT scanners and low-dose imaging protocols. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Walter Huda,et al.  PATIENT SIZE AND X-RAY TRANSMISSION IN BODY CT , 2004, Health physics.

[9]  N Pierrat,et al.  The relevance of image quality indices for dose optimization in abdominal multi-detector row CT in children: experimental assessment with pediatric phantoms , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  M. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols , 2001, European Radiology.

[11]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  R. Nelson,et al.  Radiation dose for body CT protocols: variability of scanners at one institution. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. , 2004, Radiology.

[14]  Ambady Ramachandran,et al.  Computed axial tomographic scan measurement of abdominal fat distribution and its correlation with anthropometry and insulin secretion in healthy Asian Indians. , 1997, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[15]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[16]  B. Veysman My two cents on radiation. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[17]  M. Hiorns Imaging of urinary tract lithiasis: who, when and how? , 2008, Pediatric Radiology.

[18]  T. Mulkens,et al.  Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. , 2005, Radiology.