The Sm:YAG primary fluorescence pressure scale

Primary pressure determinations involve the measurement of pressure without recourse to secondary standard materials. These measurements are essential for ensuring the accuracy of pressures measured in gasketed high-pressure devices. In this study, the wavelength of optical fluorescence bands and the density of single crystal Sm-doped yttrium aluminum garnet Y3Al5O12 (Sm:YAG) have been calibrated as a primary pressure scale up to 58 GPa. Absolute pressures were obtained by integrating the bulk modulus determined via Brillouin spectroscopy with respect to volumes measured simultaneously by X-ray diffraction. A third-order Birch-Murnaghan equation of state of Sm:YAG yields V0 = 1735.15(26) A3, KT0 = 185(1.5) GPa, and K` = 4.18(5). The accompanied pressure-induced shifts of the fluorescence lines Y1 and Y2 of Sm:YAG were calibrated to the primary pressure, thus creating a highly accurate fluorescence pressure scale. These shifts are described as P = (A/B) * {[1 + (Δλ/λ0)]B − 1} with A = 2089.91(23.04), B = −4.43(1.07) for Y1, and A = 2578.22(48.70), B = −15.38(1.62) for Y2 bands, where ∆λ = λ − λ0, λ and λ0 are wavelengths in nanometer at pressure and ambient conditions. The sensitivity in the pressure determination of the Sm:YAG fluorescence shift is 0.32 nm/GPa, which is identical to that of the ruby scale. Sm:YAG can be considered elastically isotropic up to 58 GPa, implying insensitivity of the determined pressure to the crystallographic orientation under nonhydrostatic or quasi-hydrostatic conditions. The Sm:YAG fluorescence shift is apparently also independent of crystallographic orientation, in contrast to that of ruby. Since the Y fluorescence band of Sm:YAG is insensitive to temperature changes, this material is highly suitable for the measurement of pressure at elevated temperatures.

[1]  M. E. Hills,et al.  Emission measurements and crystal‐field calculations for 4G5/2 to 6H7/2 transitions in Sm3+:YAG , 1991 .

[2]  M. Aziz,et al.  Pressure measurement at high temperature using ten Sm:YAG fluorescence peaks , 1998 .

[3]  A. Every General closed-form expressions for acoustic waves in elastically anisotropic solids , 1980 .

[4]  H. Mao,et al.  Elasticity, shear strength, and equation of state of molybdenum and gold from x-ray diffraction under nonhydrostatic compression to 24 GPa , 1999 .

[5]  J. W. Shaner,et al.  Specific volume measurements of Cu, Mo, Pd, and Ag and calibration of the ruby R1 fluorescence pressure gauge from 0.06 to 1 Mbar , 1978 .

[6]  S. Sinogeikin,et al.  BX90: a new diamond anvil cell design for X-ray diffraction and optical measurements. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[7]  N. Hess,et al.  Comparison of the pressure‐induced frequency shift of Sm:YAG to the ruby and nitrogen vibron pressure scales from 6 to 820 K and 0 to 25 GPa and suggestions for use as a high‐temperature pressure calibrant , 1992 .

[8]  E. Gregoryanz,et al.  Optical calibration of pressure sensors for high pressures and temperatures , 2005 .

[9]  R. Mittal,et al.  Lattice dynamics and Born instability in yttrium aluminum garnet, Y3A15O12 , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[10]  Baosheng Li,et al.  Elasticity of MgO to 11 GPa with an independent absolute pressure scale: Implications for pressure calibration , 2006 .

[11]  A. Barnhoorn,et al.  PVT relation of MgO derived by simultaneous elastic wave velocity and in situ X-ray measurements: A new pressure scale for the mantle transition region , 2010 .

[12]  R. Angel,et al.  Effects of deviatoric stresses in the diamond-anvil pressure cell on single-crystal samples , 2010 .

[13]  Parker,et al.  Elastic and nonlinear acoustic properties of the terbium iron garnet Tb3Fe5O12 in relation to those of other garnets. , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[14]  L. Finger,et al.  A Computer Program for Refinement of Crystal Orientation Matrix and Lattice Constants from Diffractometer Data with Lattice Symmetry Constraints , 1982 .

[15]  T. Yagi,et al.  Pressure dependence of Sm:YAG fluorescence to 50 GPa: A new calibration as a high pressure scale , 1994 .

[16]  H. Mao,et al.  Quasi‐hydrostatic compression of magnesium oxide to 52 GPa: Implications for the pressure‐volume‐temperature equation of state , 2001 .

[17]  V. Prakapenka,et al.  Compression of single-crystal magnesium oxide to 118 GPa and a ruby pressure gauge for helium pressure media , 2008 .

[18]  B. Reynard,et al.  Optimization of Sm3+ fluorescence in Sm-doped yttrium aluminum garnet: Application to pressure calibration in diamond-anvil cell at high temperature , 2002 .

[19]  L. Finger,et al.  Diffracted beam crystal centering and its application to high‐pressure crystallography , 1979 .

[20]  W. Bassett Deviatoric stress: a nuisance or a gold mine? , 2006, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[21]  L. Dubrovinsky,et al.  Ruby and Sm:YAG fluorescence pressure gauges up to 120 GPa and 700 K , 2011 .

[22]  L. Dubrovinsky,et al.  A novel gas-loading system for mechanically closing of various types of diamond anvil cells. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[23]  Ross J. Angel,et al.  SINGLE: a program to control single‐crystal diffractometers , 2011 .

[24]  S. Sinogeikin,et al.  Cubic boron nitride as a primary calibrant for a high temperature pressure scale , 2007 .

[25]  M. Berkowski,et al.  Elasticity and equation of state of Li2B4O7 , 2011 .

[26]  Ross J. Angel,et al.  Automated profile analysis for single-crystal diffraction data , 2003 .

[27]  Charles H. Whitfield,et al.  Elastic moduli of NaCl by Brillouin scattering at high pressure in a diamond anvil cell , 1976 .

[28]  K. Syassen Ruby under pressure , 2008 .

[29]  R. Jeanloz,et al.  Determination of the variation of the fluorescence line positions of ruby, strontium tetraborate, alexandrite, and samarium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet with pressure and temperature , 2011 .

[30]  A. Ruoff,et al.  A new method of absolute high pressure determination , 1973 .

[31]  A. P. Hammersley,et al.  Two-dimensional detector software: From real detector to idealised image or two-theta scan , 1996 .

[32]  J. Chervin,et al.  Hydrostatic limits of 11 pressure transmitting media , 2009 .

[33]  J. Brown,et al.  Effects of static non-hydrostatic stress on the R lines of ruby single crystals , 1996 .

[34]  H. Mao,et al.  Elasticity of MgO and a primary pressure scale to 55 GPa. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Y. Vohra,et al.  Sm:YAG optical pressure sensor to 180 GPa:Calibration and structural disorder , 1994 .

[36]  Y. Vohra,et al.  Pressure dependence of the fluorescence spectra of the Sm: doped YAG to 73 GPa , 1993 .

[37]  Lars Stixrude,et al.  Thermodynamics of mantle minerals – I. Physical properties , 2005 .

[38]  Peter M. Bell,et al.  Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi‐hydrostatic conditions , 1986 .

[39]  R. Angel,et al.  High-Temperature–High- Pressure Diffractometry , 2000 .

[40]  C. K. Jayasankar,et al.  Pressure dependent luminescence properties of Sm3+ ions in fluorophosphate glass , 2012 .

[41]  Juan Rodríguez-Carvajal,et al.  Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction , 1993 .

[42]  K. Takemura,et al.  Isothermal equation of state for gold with a He-pressure medium , 2008 .

[43]  J. R. Sandercock,et al.  Trends in brillouin scattering: Studies of opaque materials, supported films, and central modes , 1982 .

[44]  V. Prakapenka,et al.  Vibrational, elastic, and structural properties of cubic silicon carbide under pressure up to 75 GPa: Implication for a primary pressure scale , 2013 .

[45]  S. Sinogeikin,et al.  Brillouin spectrometer interfaced with synchrotron radiation for simultaneous x-ray density and acoustic velocity measurements , 2006 .

[46]  S. Sinogeikin,et al.  Single-crystal elasticity of pyrope and MgO to 20 GPa by Brillouin scattering in the diamond cell , 2000 .