In situ click chemistry: from small molecule discovery to synthetic antibodies.

Advances in the fields of proteomics, molecular imaging, and therapeutics are closely linked to the availability of affinity reagents that selectively recognize their biological targets. Here we present a review of Iterative Peptide In Situ Click Chemistry (IPISC), a novel screening technology for designing peptide multiligands with high affinity and specificity. This technology builds upon in situ click chemistry, a kinetic target-guided synthesis approach where the protein target catalyzes the conjugation of two small molecules, typically through the azide-alkyne Huisgen cycloaddition. Integrating this methodology with solid phase peptide libraries enables the assembly of linear and branched peptide multiligands we refer to as Protein Catalyzed Capture Agents (PCC Agents). The resulting structures can be thought of as analogous to the antigen recognition site of antibodies and serve as antibody replacements in biochemical and cell-based applications. In this review, we discuss the recent progress in ligand design through IPISC and related approaches, focusing on the improvements in affinity and specificity as multiligands are assembled by target-catalyzed peptide conjugation. We compare the IPISC process to small molecule in situ click chemistry with particular emphasis on the advantages and technical challenges of constructing antibody-like PCC Agents.

[1]  J. Scott,et al.  Searching for peptide ligands with an epitope library. , 1990, Science.

[2]  William Lindstrom,et al.  Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease by using in situ click chemistry. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  M. Snyder,et al.  Analyzing antibody specificity with whole proteome microarrays , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  A. Davidson,et al.  A Conserved Residue in the Yeast Bem1p SH3 Domain Maintains the High Level of Binding Specificity Required for Function* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  J W Szostak,et al.  RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Wang Jing-lin,et al.  In vitro selection and evolution of functional proteins by using ribosome display , 2003 .

[7]  E. Kool,et al.  Destabilizing universal linkers for signal amplification in self-ligating probes for RNA. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  O. Seitz,et al.  Reducing product inhibition in DNA-template-controlled ligation reactions. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[9]  J Navaza,et al.  Three-dimensional structures of the free and the antigen-complexed Fab from monoclonal anti-lysozyme antibody D44.1. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  C. Alving,et al.  Production of antibodies against phosphocholine, phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, and lipid A by injection of liposomes containing lipid A. , 1979, Journal of immunology.

[11]  P. Hajduk Fragment-based drug design: how big is too big? , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  Jason E Hein,et al.  Iterative in situ click chemistry creates antibody-like protein-capture agents. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[13]  S Cusack,et al.  Mutual conformational adaptations in antigen and antibody upon complex formation between an Fab and HIV-1 capsid protein p24. , 2000, Structure.

[14]  J. Szostak,et al.  In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands , 1990, Nature.

[15]  D R Burton,et al.  Human monoclonal antibodies against a plethora of viral pathogens from single combinatorial libraries. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Zoran Radić,et al.  In situ click chemistry: enzyme inhibitors made to their own specifications. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  J. Rouvinen,et al.  The testosterone binding mechanism of an antibody derived from a naïve human scFv library , 2011, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[19]  Zoran Radić,et al.  In situ selection of lead compounds by click chemistry: target-guided optimization of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  P. Taylor,et al.  Generation of candidate ligands for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors via in situ click chemistry with a soluble acetylcholine binding protein template. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  Franklin Peale,et al.  Variants of the Antibody Herceptin That Interact with HER2 and VEGF at the Antigen Binding Site , 2009, Science.

[22]  D. Murphy,et al.  Rapid characterization of binding specificity and cross-reactivity of antibodies using recombinant human protein arrays. , 2009, Journal of immunological methods.

[23]  Satoshi Ohara,et al.  High Affinity Anti-inorganic Material Antibody Generation by Integrating Graft and Evolution Technologies , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  H. Onoe,et al.  Template-assisted and self-activating clicked peptide as a synthetic mimic of the SH2 domain. , 2012, ACS chemical biology.

[25]  W. Jencks,et al.  On the attribution and additivity of binding energies. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Sharma,et al.  Small-molecule-dependent split aptamer ligation. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  U. Stenman,et al.  Identification of novel prostate-specific antigen-binding peptides modulating its enzyme activity. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[28]  Chi-Huey Wong,et al.  In situ click chemistry: enzyme-generated inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase II. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  P. Carter Potent antibody therapeutics by design , 2006, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[30]  Donald M. O'Rourke,et al.  Rationally designed anti-HER2/neu peptide mimetic disables P185HER2/neu tyrosine kinases in vitro and in vivo , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  A. D. de Vos,et al.  VEGF and the Fab fragment of a humanized neutralizing antibody: crystal structure of the complex at 2.4 A resolution and mutational analysis of the interface. , 1998, Structure.

[32]  K. Lam,et al.  A new type of synthetic peptide library for identifying ligand-binding activity , 1992, Nature.

[33]  P. Harbury,et al.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[34]  J. Engler,et al.  Expressed murine and human CDR-H3 intervals of equal length exhibit distinct repertoires that differ in their amino acid composition and predicted range of structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  I. Kuntz,et al.  The maximal affinity of ligands. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Kaori Sato,et al.  Novel Anti-carbohydrate Antibodies Reveal the Cooperative Function of Sulfated N- and O-Glycans in Lymphocyte Homing*♦ , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  J. Xu,et al.  Diversity in the CDR3 region of V(H) is sufficient for most antibody specificities. , 2000, Immunity.

[38]  A Tramontano,et al.  Conformations of the third hypervariable region in the VH domain of immunoglobulins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  A. Lesk,et al.  Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions , 1989, Nature.

[40]  Kit S. Lam,et al.  A new type of synthetic peptide library for identifying ligand-binding activity , 1992, Nature.

[41]  R L Stanfield,et al.  Crystal structures of an antibody to a peptide and its complex with peptide antigen at 2.8 A. , 1992, Science.

[42]  S. Ōmura,et al.  Chitinase inhibitors: extraction of the active framework from natural argifin and use of in situ click chemistry , 2009, The Journal of Antibiotics.

[43]  M. G. Finn,et al.  In situ Click Chemistry: Probing the Binding Landscapes of Biological Molecules , 2010 .

[44]  Eric T. Boder,et al.  Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[45]  O. Seitz,et al.  Achieving Turnover in DNA-Templated Reactions , 2008 .

[46]  J. Heath,et al.  Iterative in situ click chemistry assembles a branched capture agent and allosteric inhibitor for Akt1. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[47]  G. de Prat-Gay,et al.  Generation of Sequence-specific, High Affinity Anti-DNA Antibodies* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  Kristian M Müller,et al.  Positive aspects of negative design: simultaneous selection of specificity and interaction stability. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[49]  L. Wyns,et al.  Antigen Specificity and High Affinity Binding Provided by One Single Loop of a Camel Single-domain Antibody* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[50]  P. Taylor,et al.  Click chemistry in situ: acetylcholinesterase as a reaction vessel for the selective assembly of a femtomolar inhibitor from an array of building blocks. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.

[51]  T. Kodadek Synthetic receptors with antibody-like binding affinities. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[52]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Dependence of avidity on linker length for a bivalent ligand-bivalent receptor model system. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.