Adaptation to natural facial categories

Face perception is fundamentally important for judging the characteristics of individuals, such as identification of their gender, age, ethnicity or expression. We asked how the perception of these characteristics is influenced by the set of faces that observers are exposed to. Previous studies have shown that the appearance of a face can be biased strongly after viewing an altered image of the face, and have suggested that these after-effects reflect response changes in the neural mechanisms underlying object or face perception. Here we show that these adaptation effects are pronounced for natural variations in faces and for natural categorical judgements about faces. This suggests that adaptation may routinely influence face perception in normal viewing, and could have an important role in calibrating properties of face perception according to the subset of faces populating an individual's environment.

[1]  Alan R. Smith.  Comparison of Fern and Flowering Plant Distributions with Some Evolutionary Interpretations for Ferns , 1972 .

[2]  J. D. Lovis,et al.  Evolutionary Patterns and Processes in Ferns , 1978 .

[3]  A. Knoll,et al.  Patterns in vascular land plant diversification , 1983, Nature.

[4]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  S. Lidgard,et al.  Angiosperm diversification and Cretaceous floristic trends: a comparison of palynofloras and leaf macrofloras , 1990, Paleobiology.

[6]  John J. Magee,et al.  Categorical perception of facial expressions , 1992, Cognition.

[7]  P. Ekman,et al.  Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: a reply to Russell's mistaken critique. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  F. Keil,et al.  Categorical effects in the perception of faces , 1995, Cognition.

[9]  E. M. Friis,et al.  The origin and early diversification of angiosperms , 1995, Nature.

[10]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition , 1997, Cognition.

[11]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[14]  S. Lidgard,et al.  Comparing palynological abundance and diversity: implications for biotic replacement during the Cretaceous angiosperm radiation , 1999, Paleobiology.

[15]  D. Soltis,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology , 1999, Nature.

[16]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes , 1999, Nature.

[18]  W. Kress,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .

[19]  D. Levin.  Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Harry Smith,et al.  Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants—an emerging synthesis , 2000, Nature.

[21]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Dilcher.  Paleobotany: some aspects of non-flowering and flowering plant evolution , 2001 .

[24]  M. Sanderson,et al.  ABSOLUTE DIVERSIFICATION RATES IN ANGIOSPERM CLADES , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees , 2001, Bioinform..

[26]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  P. Kenrick,et al.  An Early Cretaceous root-climbing epiphyte (Lindsaeaceae) and its significance for calibrating the diversification of polypodiaceous ferns. , 2001, Review of palaeobotany and palynology.

[28]  E. M. Friis,et al.  Fossil evidence of water lilies (Nymphaeales) in the Early Cretaceous , 2001, Nature.

[29]  Paul G. Wolf,et al.  Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants , 2001, Nature.

[30]  C. Chubb,et al.  The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[31]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  N. Wikström,et al.  Evolution of Lycopodiaceae (Lycopsida): estimating divergence times from rbcL gene sequences by use of nonparametric rate smoothing. , 2001, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[33]  S. Deng.  Ecology of the Early Cretaceous ferns of Northeast China , 2002 .

[34]  M. Sanderson.  Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[35]  N. Nagalingum,et al.  Fern spore diversity and abundance in Australia during the Cretaceous , 2002 .

[36]  Pamela S Soltis,et al.  Rate heterogeneity among lineages of tracheophytes: Integration of molecular and fossil data and evidence for molecular living fossils , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  R8s: Inferring Absolute Rates of Molecular Evolution, Divergence times in the Absence of a Molecular Clock , 2003, Bioinform..

[39]  C. Clifford,et al.  Pulling Faces: An Investigation of the Face-Distortion Aftereffect , 2003, Perception.

[40]  Hiroko Kawai,et al.  Responses of ferns to red light are mediated by an unconventional photoreceptor , 2003, Nature.

[41]  K. Nakayama,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article FITTING THE MIND TO THE WORLD: Face Adaptation and Attractiveness Aftereffects , 2022 .

[42]  Michael J Benton,et al.  Dating the Tree of Life , 2003, Science.