Diversity of Motor Responses Initiated by a Wind Stimulus in the Freely Moving Cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus

Abstract The behavioral responses to a wind stimulus were studied in the freely moving cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. The observed responses included walking, running, jumping, turning, withdrawing, abdominal lifting, hind-leg lifting, kicking, cercal cleaning, antennal swinging, and “no action” and were classified into five behaviors as functional categories: escape, evasion, offense, surveillance and “no action”. The elicitation of each type of behavior by an identical stimulus was variable and unpredictable. However, the stochastic approach showed that the probabilities of the behaviors converged in a series of responses obtained from one cricket and in mass response data collected from 48 crickets. These probabilities, the values calculated from the different populations, were the same. The statistical analysis, using the probabilities, revealed that the probabilities of these wind-evoked behaviors were affected by the intensity of the wind stimulus. The escape and “no action” were dominant, together constituting more than 60% of the total responses. The stimulus method and the animal conditions determining a high probability of escape are also discussed.

[1]  Tateo Shimozawa,et al.  A threshold analysis of cricket cercal interneurons by an alternating air-current stimulus , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[2]  G. Kämper,et al.  Abdominal ascending interneurons in crickets: responses to sound at the 30-Hz calling-song frequency , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  W. Gnatzy,et al.  Digger wasp against crickets. II. An airborne signal produced by a running predator , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  J. Camhi The escape system of the cockroach. , 1980 .

[5]  J. Camhi,et al.  The wind-evoked escape behavior of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: integration of behavioral elements , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  The cercus-to-giant interneuron system of crickets , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[7]  R. Murphey,et al.  Connectivity of identified central synapses in the cricket is normal following regeneration and blockade of presynaptic activity. , 1991, Journal of neurobiology.

[8]  J Palka,et al.  The cerci and abdominal giant fibres of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. I. Anatomy and physiology of normal adults , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  Tsuneo Yamaguchi,et al.  Distinction in morphology and behavioral role between dorsal and ventral groups of cricket giant interneurons , 1993 .

[10]  T. Shimozawa,et al.  Differing afferent connections of spiking and nonspiking wind-sensitive local interneurons in the terminal abdominal ganglion of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[11]  R. K. Murphey,et al.  Pre- and postsynaptic inhibition of identified giant interneurons in the cricket (Acheta domesticus) , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[12]  M. Hörner,et al.  Wind-Evoked Escape Running of the cricket Gryllus Bimaculatus: I. Behavioural Analysis , 1992 .

[13]  K. Dumpert,et al.  Cricket combined mechanoreceptors and kicking response , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  Tsuneo Yamaguchi,et al.  Morphology and response properties of wind-sensitive non-giant interneurons in the terminal abdominal ganglion of crickets , 1991 .

[15]  J. Miller,et al.  Representation of sensory information in the cricket cercal sensory system. I. Response properties of the primary interneurons. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Stimulus-response properties of cricket cereal filiform receptors , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.