Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC): development of a questionnaire

Objective. The aims of the study were to translate and adapt both the negative and positive items of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ) into Danish and to test the translated version for comprehension, suitability, and content coverage by developing new items in a setting of false-positive screening mammography. Design. The translation was carried out following an internationally accepted method involving two panels: bilingual and lay. Subjects. The suitability and the content coverage of the PCQ were tested in six group interviews. Participants in the interviews were women who had had a false-positive screening mammography. They were grouped according to additional examinations they experienced following abnormal screening mammography. The audio-recordings from the group interviews were thematically analysed to identify the key consequences of abnormal and false-positive screening mammography. Results. Fifteen new items were generated to cover the negative psychosocial consequences of abnormal and false-positive screening mammography comprehensively. Five new items were produced that concerned the consequences of screening mammography during the period after being declared “free from” suspicion of cancer. Three items from the PCQ were deleted because they were judged by interviewees to be irrelevant. Response options for the positive items were changed to allow responses in both positive and negative directions. Conclusion. Because of the major changes to both parts of the PCQ the measure derived from this study should be regarded as a new questionnaire with two parts: Consequences Of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC). Part II focuses on the long-term consequences of a false-positive screening mammography.

[1]  Hanne Thorsen,et al.  Adapting quality of life instruments. , 2004, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[2]  D. Collins Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[3]  K. Clover,et al.  Development and validation of the PCQ: a questionnaire to measure the psychological consequences of screening mammography. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[4]  J Austoker,et al.  Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment. , 1998, Journal of public health medicine.

[5]  J. Austoker,et al.  Breast Screening: Adverse Psychological Consequences One Month after Placing Women on Early Recall Because of a Diagnostic Uncertainty. A Multicentre Study , 1997, Journal of medical screening.

[6]  J. Austoker,et al.  The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review , 2005, Psycho-oncology.

[7]  S. Kreiner,et al.  Validation of a condition-specific measure for women having an abnormal screening mammography. , 2007, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[8]  A. Sandbæk Qualitative methods used for effect studies and evaluations of healthcare strategies? , 2006 .

[9]  Catherine Acquadro,et al.  Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[10]  G. L. Engel,et al.  The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. , 1980, The American journal of psychiatry.

[11]  A. Sandbaek Qualitative methods used for effect studies and evaluations of healthcare strategies? , 2006, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[12]  A. Miller Screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.

[13]  K. Balanda,et al.  Psychologic distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammography screening , 1999, Cancer.

[14]  J. Brodersen,et al.  The Adequacy of Measurement of Short and Long-Term Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammography , 2004, Journal of medical screening.

[15]  Lynda C Doward,et al.  The translation and cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures. , 2005, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[16]  David M Meads,et al.  Requirements for quality of life instruments in clinical research. , 2004, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[17]  J Austoker,et al.  Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance. , 2001, Journal of public health medicine.