A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from homogeneous clear cell renal cell carcinoma
暂无分享,去创建一个
Dapeng Hao | Jingjing Cui | Pei Nie | Yan Jia | Guangjie Yang | Jie Wu | P. Nie | Guangjie Yang | Zhenguang Wang | Lei Yan | Wenjie Miao | D. Hao | Jie Wu | Yujun Zhao | Aidi Gong | J. Cui | Yan Jia | Haitao Niu | Zhenguang Wang | Lei Yan | Wenjie Miao | Yujun Zhao | Aidi Gong | Haitao Niu
[1] M. Haider,et al. CT texture analysis: a potential tool for prediction of survival in patients with metastatic clear cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib , 2017, Cancer Imaging.
[2] M. McInnes,et al. Angiomyolipoma (AML) without visible fat: Ultrasound, CT and MR imaging features with pathological correlation , 2016, European Radiology.
[3] Jiule Ding,et al. CT-based radiomic model predicts high grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. , 2018, European journal of radiology.
[4] M. McInnes,et al. Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[5] Ximing J. Yang,et al. Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Renal Angiomyolipoma. , 2016, The Journal of urology.
[6] Zhichao Feng,et al. Machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of CT images of small renal masses: Differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma , 2018, European Radiology.
[7] Matthew S Davenport,et al. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[8] Junmo Kim,et al. Differentiation of fat‐poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast‐enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification , 2017, Medical physics.
[9] B. Lane,et al. Renal Angiomyolipoma: Preoperative Identification of Atypical Fat-Poor AML , 2015, Current Urology Reports.
[10] M. McInnes,et al. Ten uncommon and unusual variants of renal angiomyolipoma (AML): radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 2015, Clinical radiology.
[11] Wenping Wang,et al. Triphasic and epithelioid minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative CEUS characteristics and distinguishing features , 2015, Abdominal Imaging.
[12] Paul Kinahan,et al. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.
[13] O. Kilickesmez,et al. Textural differences between renal cell carcinoma subtypes: Machine learning-based quantitative computed tomography texture analysis with independent external validation. , 2018, European journal of radiology.
[14] Zhong-Qiu Wang,et al. Chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis , 2018, European Radiology.
[15] Vicky Goh,et al. Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? , 2013, European journal of radiology.
[16] Lifen Yan,et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma by texture analysis on CT images. , 2015, Academic radiology.
[17] Shu-Huei Shen,et al. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma? , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[18] H. Yin,et al. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: CT-based radiomics features for the prediction of Fuhrman grade. , 2018, European journal of radiology.
[19] Steven Y Cen,et al. Differentiation of Predominantly Solid Enhancing Lipid-Poor Renal Cell Masses by Use of Contrast-Enhanced CT: Evaluating the Role of Texture in Tumor Subtyping. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[20] M. McInnes,et al. Renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat: Can we make the diagnosis using CT and MRI? , 2018, European Radiology.
[21] Guangtao Zhai,et al. Differentiation of clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas by all-relevant radiomics features from multiphase CT: a VHL mutation perspective , 2018, European Radiology.
[22] R. Oyen,et al. Renal Angiomyolipoma: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , 2018, Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology.
[23] Shanigarn Thiravit,et al. The different faces of renal angiomyolipomas on radiologic imaging: a pictorial review. , 2018, The British journal of radiology.
[24] Nicola Schieda,et al. Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis be Used to Differentiate Fat-poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images? , 2015, Radiology.
[25] Byung Kwan Park,et al. Renal Angiomyolipoma: Radiologic Classification and Imaging Features According to the Amount of Fat. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[26] Gautam Kunapuli,et al. A Decision-Support Tool for Renal Mass Classification , 2018, Journal of Digital Imaging.
[27] Wenping Wang,et al. Minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma: the initial study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[28] Shuai Leng,et al. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[29] A. Shinagare,et al. Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Role of the Radiologist in the Era of Precision Medicine. , 2017, Radiology.
[30] G. Collins,et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.