Improved microphysical parametrization of drizzle and fog for operational forecasting using the Met Office Unified Model

In order to improve the forecasting of fog, visibility and drizzle within the Met Office Unified Model, three parametrizations are included in high-resolution, limited-area versions of the model. These are (i) improved rainfall speeds; (ii) linking aerosol to the autoconversion scheme; and (iii) a taper curve for cloud droplets near the surface. The results show a better representation of low-visibility conditions in winter. There is a general reduction in drizzle and a better representation of drizzle depending on whether the air mass is clean or polluted. Summertime occurrences of fog are also reduced and are now under-forecast, which will require a further investigation to correct. The package described in the paper has been made operational in the 4 and 1.5 km operational forecast versions of the Unified Model during the spring and summer of 2011, showing an improvement in model performance and a reduction in model error. This demonstrates the ability to improve operational NWP forecasts by coupling cloud and aerosol processes. Copyright © 2012 British Crown copyright, the Met Office. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

[1]  J. Price.  Radiation Fog. Part I: Observations of Stability and Drop Size Distributions , 2011 .

[2]  William R. Cotton,et al.  A Numerical Investigation of Several Factors Contributing to the Observed Variable Intensity of Deep Convection over South Florida , 1980 .

[3]  H. Webster,et al.  The Buncefield oil depot incident: a discussion of the meteorology , 2007 .

[4]  G. Thompson,et al.  Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes , 2009 .

[5]  J. Haywood,et al.  Prediction of visibility and aerosol within the operational Met Office Unified Model. II: Validation of model performance using observational data , 2008 .

[6]  P. Robinson,et al.  The Influence of Weather on Flight Operations at the Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport , 1989 .

[7]  B. Shipway,et al.  Analytical estimation of cloud droplet nucleation based on an underlying aerosol population , 2010 .

[8]  D. L. Roberts,et al.  A climate model study of indirect radiative forcing by anthropogenic sulphate aerosols , 1994, Nature.

[9]  I. Boutle,et al.  Microphysical controls on the stratocumulus topped boundary-layer structure during VOCALS-REx , 2012 .

[10]  George A. Isaac,et al.  Aircraft observations of cloud droplet number concentration: Implications for climate studies , 2004 .

[11]  D. S. Zrnic,et al.  Differential propagation phase shift and rainfall rate estimation , 1986 .

[12]  Jonathan M. Wilkinson.  Does the introduction of a simple cloud-aerosol interaction improve the representation of drizzle in the operational Met Office Unified Model? , 2010 .

[13]  Neil I. Fox,et al.  The Retrieval of Stratocumulus Cloud Properties by Ground-Based Cloud Radar , 1997 .

[14]  S. Klein,et al.  The Seasonal Cycle of Low Stratiform Clouds , 1993 .

[15]  Albert Arking,et al.  The radiative effects of clouds and their impact on climate , 1991 .

[16]  J. Marshall,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF RAINDROPS WITH SIZE , 1948 .

[17]  Peter Clark,et al.  Prediction of visibility and aerosol within the operational Met Office Unified Model. I: Model formulation and variational assimilation , 2008 .

[18]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model , 1999 .

[19]  B. Albrecht.  Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[20]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment - ASTEX , 1995 .

[21]  R. Moore,et al.  Use of high‐resolution NWP rainfall and river flow forecasts for advance warning of the Carlisle flood, north‐west England , 2009 .

[22]  G. Martin,et al.  A New Boundary Layer Mixing Scheme. Part I: Scheme Description and Single-Column Model Tests , 2000 .

[23]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Seasonal variation of cloud radiative forcing derived from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment , 1990 .

[24]  H. Lean,et al.  The benefits of the Met Office variable resolution NWP model for forecasting convection , 2013 .

[25]  K. Bower,et al.  A parameterisation of the effective radius of ice free clouds for use in global climate models , 1992 .

[26]  J. Curry,et al.  A New Double-Moment Microphysics Parameterization for Application in Cloud and Climate Models. Part I: Description , 2005 .

[27]  B. Ferrier,et al.  A Double-Moment Multiple-Phase Four-Class Bulk Ice Scheme. Part I: Description , 1994 .

[28]  James O. Pinto,et al.  Mesoscale modeling of springtime Arctic mixed-phase stratiform clouds using a new two-moment bulk microphysics scheme , 2005 .

[29]  James J. Hack,et al.  Evaluation of Forecasted Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus in the NCAR, GFDL, and ECMWF Models , 2008 .

[30]  S. Twomey,et al.  The nuclei of natural cloud formation part II: The supersaturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet concentration , 1959 .

[31]  A. Staniforth,et al.  A new dynamical core for the Met Office's global and regional modelling of the atmosphere , 2005 .

[32]  Graham Feingold,et al.  The Retrieval of Stratus Cloud Droplet Effective Radius with Cloud Radars , 2002 .

[33]  I. Boutle,et al.  An improved representation of the raindrop size distribution for single‐moment microphysics schemes , 2012 .

[34]  Ismail Gultepe,et al.  A New Visibility Parameterization for Warm-Fog Applications in Numerical Weather Prediction Models , 2006 .

[35]  Christoph Schär,et al.  Probabilistic Flood Forecasting with a Limited-Area Ensemble Prediction System: Selected Case Studies , 2007 .

[36]  S. Ghan,et al.  A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types , 2000 .

[37]  John P. Oakley,et al.  The Fog Remote Sensing and Modeling Field Project , 2009 .

[38]  K. Beard.  Terminal Velocity and Shape of Cloud and Precipitation Drops Aloft , 1976 .

[39]  M. Yau,et al.  A Multimoment Bulk Microphysics Parameterization. Part II: A Proposed Three-Moment Closure and Scheme Description , 2005 .

[40]  H. D. Orville,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Precipitation and Cloud Shadow Effects on Mountain-Induced Cumuli , 1969 .

[41]  W. T. Roach,et al.  The physics of radiation fog: II – a numerical study , 1976 .

[42]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Verification of cloud‐fraction forecasts , 2009 .

[43]  Andreas Bott,et al.  Three‐dimensional fog forecasting in complex terrain , 2010 .

[44]  S. Abel,et al.  Evaluation of stratocumulus cloud prediction in the Met Office forecast model during VOCALS-REx , 2010 .

[45]  Sungsu Park,et al.  A single-column model intercomparison of a heavily drizzling stratocumulus-topped boundary layer , 2007 .

[46]  Robert Wood,et al.  Drizzle in Stratiform Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Microphysical Aspects. , 2005 .

[47]  B. Shipway,et al.  A comparison of cloud‐resolving model simulations of trade wind cumulus with aircraft observations taken during RICO , 2007 .

[48]  B. Golding,et al.  The Boscastle flood: Meteorological analysis of the conditions leading to flooding on 16 August 2004 , 2005 .

[49]  Fog prediction using a very high resolution numerical weather prediction model forced with a single profile , 2009 .

[50]  M. Khairoutdinov,et al.  A New Cloud Physics Parameterization in a Large-Eddy Simulation Model of Marine Stratocumulus , 2000 .

[51]  Eberhard Parlow,et al.  A One-dimensional Ensemble Forecast and Assimilation System for Fog Prediction , 2007 .