The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries

Abstract.  This article presents a quantitative measurement of the political legitimacy of states in the late 1990s and early 2000s for 72 states containing 5.1 billion people, or 83 per cent of the world's population. First, the concept of state legitimacy is defined and justified. The definition includes the subjects, objects and sub-types of legitimacy. A strategy to achieve replicable cross-national measurements of legitimacy is then outlined and implemented, including a discussion of data sources and three alternative aggregation methods. The results are briefly examined and tested, and the uncertainties of quantitative measures discussed. Finally, the role of supplementary qualitative measurement is considered.

[1]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[2]  Margaret Levi,et al.  Of Rule and Revenue , 1991 .

[3]  S. Huntington.  The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century , 1991 .

[4]  T. Gurr,et al.  Why Men Rebel. , 1970 .

[5]  J. Migdal.  Strong Societies and Weak States , 1988 .

[6]  J. Traupmann,et al.  Equity: Theory and Research , 1978 .

[7]  R. Inglehart.  Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies , 1997 .

[8]  Thomas Barman.  Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway , 1967 .

[9]  Rex B. Martin.  Just War and Human Rights , 2002 .

[10]  José Antonio Cheibub,et al.  Political Regimes and the Extractive Capacity of Governments: Taxation in Democracies and Dictatorships , 1998, World Politics.

[11]  Lynn Harold Vogel,et al.  World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators , 1975 .

[12]  N. Nevitte,et al.  Authority Orientations and Political Support: A Cross-national Analysis of Satisfaction with Governments and Democracy , 2002 .

[13]  M. Walzer.  The Argument about Humanitarian Intervention , 2004 .

[14]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[15]  M. Seligson,et al.  Diffuse Political Support and Antisystem Political Behavior: A Comparative Analysis , 1982 .

[16]  B. Crick,et al.  In Defense of Politics , 1962 .

[17]  J. Plamenatz.  Consent, freedom and political obligation , 1938 .

[18]  R. Barker.  Political legitimacy and the state , 1990 .

[19]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. , 1983, Journal of personality.

[20]  J. Baron,et al.  Psychological perspectives on justice: Conclusion , 1993 .

[21]  M. C. Hudson.  Arab Politics: The Search for Legitimacy , 1977 .

[22]  James Miller.  Legitimation Crisis , 1975, Telos.

[23]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why Do People Help the Police Fight Crime in Their Communities? , 2010 .

[24]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture Revisited , 1980 .

[25]  D. Easton,et al.  A Systems Analysis of Political Life , 1966 .

[26]  W. Connolly.  Legitimacy and the State , 1984 .

[27]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[28]  Jay Verkuilen,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy , 2002 .

[29]  Y. Zhong.  Legitimacy crisis and legitimation in China , 1996 .

[30]  James D. Fearon,et al.  Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country* , 2003 .

[31]  David Beetham,et al.  The Legitimation of Power , 1991 .

[32]  R. Bates,et al.  A Note on Taxation, Development, and Representative Government , 1985 .

[33]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture , 1963 .

[34]  E. Lieberman.  Taxation data as indicators of state-society relations: Possibilities and pitfalls in cross-national research , 2002 .

[35]  Unveiling the Vote , 1990 .

[36]  H. Pitkin.  Obligation and Consent—I , 1965, American Political Science Review.