Do lions have manes? For children, generics are about kinds rather than quantities.

Generic statements (e.g., "Lions have manes") make claims about kinds (e.g., lions as a category) and, for adults, are distinct from quantificational statements (e.g., "Most lions have manes"), which make claims about how many individuals have a given property. This article examined whether young children also understand that generics do not depend purely on quantitative information. Five-year-olds (n = 36) evaluated pairs of questions expressing properties that were matched in prevalence but varied in whether adults accept them as generically true (e.g., "Do lions have manes?" [true] vs. "Are lions boys?" [false]). Results demonstrated that children evaluate generics based on more than just quantitative information. Data suggest that even young children recognize that generics make claims about kinds.

[1]  S. Gelman,et al.  Beyond labeling: the role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. , 1991, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[2]  Amanda C. Brandone,et al.  Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences , 2010, Language and cognitive processes.

[3]  S. Gelman,et al.  The Influence of Language Form and Conventional Wording on Judgments of Illness , 2007, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[4]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Developmental changes in the understanding of generics , 2007, Cognition.

[5]  Woo-kyoung Ahn,et al.  From the Selectedworks of Charles A. Sanislow Beliefs about Essences and the Reality of Mental Disorders , 2022 .

[6]  Gail D. Heyman,et al.  Carrot-Eaters and Creature-Believers: The Effects of Lexicalization on Children's Inferences About Social Categories , 1999 .

[7]  P. L. Adams THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .

[8]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  Generics: Cognition and Acquisition , 2008 .

[9]  Heidi Kloos,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article When Looks Are Everything Appearance Similarity Versus Kind Information in Early Induction , 2022 .

[10]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Words, thoughts, and theories , 1997 .

[11]  S. Gelman,et al.  The Essential Child : Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought , 2003 .

[12]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning. , 2005, Psychological review.

[13]  Amanda C. Brandone,et al.  Generic Statements Require Little Evidence for Acceptance but Have Powerful Implications , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[15]  S. Carey The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[16]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  Preschool children’s use of cues to generic meaning , 2008, Cognition.

[17]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[18]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction , 1989 .

[19]  Amanda C. Brandone,et al.  Fast-Mapping Placeholders: Using Words to Talk About Kinds , 2010, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[20]  Preschoolers' use of morphosyntactic cues to identify generic sentences: indefinite singular noun phrases, tense, and aspect. , 2011, Child development.

[21]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[22]  Jon Star,et al.  Children's interpretation of generic noun phrases. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[23]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  Generics, Prevalence, and Default Inferences , 2009 .

[24]  F. Keil Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[25]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Naming in young children: a dumb attentional mechanism? , 1996, Cognition.

[26]  Sandeep Prasada,et al.  Representation of Principled Connections: A Window Onto the Formal Aspect of Common Sense Conception , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  S. Gelman,et al.  Preschool children use linguistic form class and pragmatic cues to interpret generics. , 2003, Child development.

[28]  Sandeep Prasada,et al.  Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception , 2006, Cognition.

[29]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Mechanisms of theory formation in young children , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  C. Chambers,et al.  When hearsay trumps evidence: How generic language guides preschoolers’ inferences about unfamiliar things , 2008 .

[31]  Greg Carlson,et al.  A unified analysis of the English bare plural , 1977 .

[32]  Magdi N. Kamel,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition , 2008, Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering.

[33]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2005 .

[34]  L. Rips,et al.  Categories and resemblance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[36]  Amanda C. Brandone,et al.  Differences in preschoolers’ and adults’ use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: A window onto a conceptual divide , 2009, Cognition.

[37]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Interactions between causal and statistical learning , 2007 .

[38]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  GENERICS AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE MIND , 2007 .

[39]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  Induction and categorization in young children: a similarity-based model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  The Generic book , 1997 .

[42]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Causal learning : psychology, philosophy, and computation , 2007 .

[43]  Elizabeth F. Shipley,et al.  Categories, hierarchies, and induction , 1993 .

[44]  Barbara W Sarnecka,et al.  Generic Language in Parent-Child Conversations , 2008, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[45]  Marianne G. Taylor,et al.  Mother-child conversations about gender : understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs , 2004 .

[46]  S. Waxman,et al.  The Role of Representational Status and Item Complexity in Parent-Child Conversations about Pictures and Objects. , 2008, Cognitive development.

[47]  R. Abelson,et al.  THE SUBJECTIVE USE OF INDUCTIVE EVIDENCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  E. Markman,et al.  Subtle Linguistic Cues Affect Children's Motivation , 2007, Psychological science.

[49]  F. Keil,et al.  Explanation and understanding , 2015 .

[50]  Sandeep Prasada,et al.  Acquiring generic knowledge , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  Dirk van Rijn,et al.  Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2003 .