Critical tumor suppressor function mediated by epithelial Mig-6 in endometrial 1 cancer. 2

26 Endometrial cancer is preceded by endometrial hyperplasia, unopposed estrogen 27 exposure and genetic alterations, but the precise causes of endometrial cancer remain 28 uncertain. Mig-6 , mainly known as a negative regulator of the EGF receptor, is an 29 important mediator of progesterone signaling in the uterus, where it mediates tumor 30 suppression by modulating endometrial stromal-epithelial communications. In this 31 study, we investigated the function of Mig-6 in the uterine epithelium using a tissue- 32 specific gene knockout strategy, in which floxed Mig-6 ( Mig-6 f/f ) mice were crossed to 33 Wnt7a-Cre mice ( Wnt7a cre+ Mig-6 f/f ). Wnt7a cre+ Mig-6 f/f mice developed endometrial 34 hyperplasia and estrogen-dependent endometrial cancer, exhibiting increased 35 proliferation in epithelial cells as well as apoptosis in sub-epithelial stromal cells. We 36 documented increased expression of NOTCH1 and BIRC3 in epithelial cells of 37 Wnt7a cre+ Mig-6 f/f mice and decreased expression of the progesterone receptor (PR) in 38 stromal cells. Progesterone therapy controls endometrial growth and prevents 39 endometrial cancer, but the effectiveness of progesterone as a treatment for women with 40 endometrial cancer is less clear. We noted that the hyperplasic phenotype of Wnt7a cre+ 41 Mig-6 f/f mice was prevented by progesterone treatment, whereas this treatment had no 42 effect in PR cre/+ Mig-6 f/f mice where Mig-6 was deleted in both the epithelial and Mig-6 the the the presence of progesterone and that Mig-6 regulates PTEN/PI3K/AKT signaling In searching for relevance of the findings from the animal study to human endometrial cancer, we found a significantly lower MIG-6 expression in human endometrioid carcinoma cells compared to normal uterine cells, suggesting a similar Mig-6 regulated system present in the human uterus (20). Tumor suppressor function of Mig-6 90 coordinates endometrial stromal-epithelial communication. The expression of Mig-6 in these cellular compartments is under tight temporal and endocrine control. However, the 92 function of Mig-6 in endometrial cancer has remained elusive. In this study, we used endometrial epithelial cell specific Mig-6 knockout ( Wnt7a cre+ Mig-6 f/f ) mice to assess the role of epithelial Mig-6 in steroid hormone 95 responsiveness and tumorigenesis (18, 22). We observed that Wnt7a cre+ Mig-6 f/f mice 96 display normal P4 attenuation of E2-mediated uterine hypertrophy. However, Wnt7a cre+ 97 Mig-6 f/f mice develop endometrial hyperplasia as well as estrogen-induced endometrial cancer. The development of endometrial hyperplasia in Wnt7a cre+ Mig-6 f/f mice is prevented by P4 treatment. These data suggest that P4-induced stromal Mig-6 prevents 100 hyperplasia seen in Wnt7a cre+ Mig-6 f/f mice by regulating estrogen signaling. mRNA (ER target Mig-6 , and 18S (for primers cDNA RNA Transcriptase PCR All real-time PCR was by using five independent RNA sets. The relative expression of each transcript was normalized to 18S rRNA using ABI rRNA control reagents. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA. Differences between multiple groups were determined by Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparisons test. cre/+ These results therapy. It is sufficient to play as a tumor suppressor and/or mediator of PR-P4 393 signaling, even though expression of Mig-6 in Wnt7a cre+ Mig-6 f/f mice is lower than control mice after P4 treatment. Our results suggest that activated stromal Mig-6 can regulate proliferation and apoptosis via regulating ER α activity in epithelium, can contribute to the prevention of endometrial hyperplasia and that epithelial Mig-6 is a critical tumor suppressor involved in P4 mediated protection against the development endometrial cancer. These results suggest that epithelial Mig-6 is critical for a tumor suppressor function in endometrial cancer. this hyperplastic phenotype ER α The Wnt7a cre+ Mig-6 f/f model is useful for studying new targets during cancer progression and can be exploited therapeutically in order to identify new therapies for the prevention and treatment of endometrial cancer. Determining the role of Mig-6 in stromal-epithelial cross talk will be critical in understanding the role of steroid hormone signaling in endometrial function and dysfunction associated with infertility and endometriosis and in developing therapy for both of these common uterine diseases. analysis of α target genes ( Muc-1 , Clca3 , Ltf, Birc1a and Birc1b ) was performed on uteri of control mice, PR mice and after vehicle or treatment. The results represent the relative expression of transcripts

[1]  Liu Liu,et al.  Targeting Inhibitors of Apoptosis Proteins (IAPs) For New Breast Cancer Therapeutics , 2012, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[2]  R. Behringer,et al.  Stromal-to-Epithelial Transition during Postpartum Endometrial Regeneration , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  H. Kashima,et al.  Prognostic significance of Notch signalling molecules and their involvement in the invasiveness of endometrial carcinoma cells , 2012, Histopathology.

[4]  R. Behringer,et al.  Epithelial progesterone receptor exhibits pleiotropic roles in uterine development and function , 2012, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[5]  Simone Fulda,et al.  Targeting IAP proteins for therapeutic intervention in cancer , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[6]  A. Capobianco,et al.  Notch signalling in solid tumours: a little bit of everything but not all the time , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[7]  Jae-Wook Jeong,et al.  ERBB Receptor Feedback Inhibitor 1 Regulation of Estrogen Receptor Activity Is Critical for Uterine Implantation in Mice1 , 2010, Biology of reproduction.

[8]  J. Kim,et al.  Role of Progesterone in Endometrial Cancer , 2010, Seminars in reproductive medicine.

[9]  K. Lee,et al.  Conservative Treatment With Progestin and Pregnancy Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer , 2009, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[10]  J. Kim,et al.  Absence of progesterone receptors in a failed case of fertility-sparing treatment in early endometrial cancer: a case report. , 2008, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[11]  T. Golde,et al.  Rational targeting of Notch signaling in cancer , 2008, Oncogene.

[12]  H. Ishikura,et al.  Fertility-preserving treatment with progestin, and pathological criteria to predict responses, in young women with endometrial cancer. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[13]  Sudhansu K. Dey,et al.  Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  L. D. White,et al.  Identification of murine uterine genes regulated in a ligand-dependent manner by the progesterone receptor. , 2005, Endocrinology.

[15]  Chen Huiping,et al.  Loss of RALT/MIG-6 expression in ERBB2-amplified breast carcinomas enhances ErbB-2 oncogenic potency and favors resistance to Herceptin , 2005, Oncogene.

[16]  A. Benshushan Endometrial adenocarcinoma in young patients: evaluation and fertility-preserving treatment. , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[17]  P. Cooke,et al.  Role of stromal-epithelial interactions in hormonal responses. , 2004, Archives of histology and cytology.

[18]  D. Bodurka,et al.  Hormonal therapy for the management of grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma: a literature review. , 2004, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  C. Dunton,et al.  Endometrial Hyperplasia: A Review , 2004, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[20]  G. Salvesen,et al.  IAP proteins: blocking the road to death's door , 2002, Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology.

[21]  C. Clarke,et al.  Detection of progesterone receptor forms A and B by immunohistochemical analysis , 2001, Journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Conservative therapy for adenocarcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia of the endometrium in young women: central pathologic review and treatment outcome. , 2001, Cancer letters.

[23]  T. Iwasaka,et al.  Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry in endometrial carcinoma. , 1998, Gynecologic oncology.

[24]  S. Dey,et al.  Blastocyst's state of activity determines the "window" of implantation in the receptive mouse uterus. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Halme,et al.  Endometriosis and associated pathology. , 1991, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[26]  A. Pfleiderer,et al.  Estrogen and progesterone receptors in endometrial cancer and their prognostic relevance. , 1990 .

[27]  C. Clarke,et al.  Progestin regulation of cellular proliferation. , 1990, Endocrine reviews.

[28]  G. Sutton,et al.  Steroid receptors and clinical outcome in patients with adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  A. MacKenzie,et al.  Estrogen suppresses uterine epithelial apoptosis by inducing birc1 expression. , 2008, Molecular endocrinology.

[30]  B. O’Malley,et al.  Reproductive functions of progesterone receptors. , 2002, Recent progress in hormone research.

[31]  B. Paria,et al.  Differential uterine expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors correlates with uterine preparation for implantation and decidualization in the mouse. , 1999, Endocrinology.

[32]  J. Halme,et al.  Endometriosis: the host response. , 1993, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology.

[33]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[34]  C. Holinka,et al.  Endometrial carcinoma: two diseases? , 1987, Cancer detection and prevention.

[35]  R. Kurman,et al.  The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients , 1986 .

[36]  G P Dotto Serveur Académique Lausannois SERVAL serval.unil.ch , 2022 .