The experimental folding landscape of monomeric lactose repressor, a large two-domain protein, involves two kinetic intermediates.

To probe the experimental folding behavior of a large protein with complex topology, we created a monomeric variant of the lactose repressor protein (MLAc), a well characterized tetrameric protein that regulates transcription of the lac operon. Purified MLAc is folded, fully functional, and binds the inducer isopropyl beta-d-thiogalactoside with the same affinity as wild-type LacI. Equilibrium unfolding of MLAc induced by the chemical denaturant urea is a reversible, apparent two-state process (pH 7.5, 20 degrees C). However, time-resolved experiments demonstrate that unfolding is single-exponential, whereas refolding data indicate two transient intermediates. The data reveal the initial formation of a burst-phase (tau < ms) intermediate that corresponds to approximately 50% of the total secondary-structure content. This step is followed by a rearrangement reaction that is rate-limited by an unfolding process (tau approximately 3 s; pH 7.5, 20 degrees C) and results in a second intermediate. This MLAc intermediate converts to the native structure (tau approximately 30 s; pH 7.5, 20 degrees C). Remarkably, the experimental folding-energy landscape for MLAc is in excellent agreement with theoretical predictions using a simple topology-based C(alpha)-model as presented in a companion article in this issue.

[1]  Lorna J. Smith,et al.  Understanding protein folding via free-energy surfaces from theory and experiment. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[2]  D. Baker,et al.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Cecilia Clementi,et al.  Characterization of the folding landscape of monomeric lactose repressor: quantitative comparison of theory and experiment. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  F. Vovelle,et al.  Comparison of solution structure of free and complexed lac operator by molecular modelling with NMR constraints. , 1994, Biochimie.

[5]  Munehito Arai,et al.  Unification of the folding mechanisms of non-two-state and two-state proteins. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  G. Chang,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Lactose Operon Repressor and Its Complexes with DNA and Inducer , 1996, Science.

[7]  V. Pande,et al.  Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics , 2002, Nature.

[8]  M. Slijper,et al.  Formation of the hinge helix in the lac represser is induced upon binding to the lac operator , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[9]  R F Newby,et al.  DNA binding of the lac repressor. , 1968, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  The complete folding pathway of a protein from nanoseconds to microseconds , 2003, Nature.

[11]  Kevin W Plaxco,et al.  The topomer search model: A simple, quantitative theory of two‐state protein folding kinetics , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[12]  A. Fersht.  Structure and mechanism in protein science , 1998 .

[13]  C. Brooks.  Viewing protein folding from many perspectives , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  S. Jackson,et al.  How do small single-domain proteins fold? , 1998, Folding & design.

[15]  Liskin Swint-Kruse,et al.  Perturbation from a distance: mutations that alter LacI function through long-range effects. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[16]  T. Kiefhaber,et al.  Evidence for sequential barriers and obligatory intermediates in apparent two-state protein folding. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Meeting halfway on the bridge between protein folding theory and experiment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  K. Matthews,et al.  Dissociation of the lactose repressor-operator DNA complex: effects of size and sequence context of operator-containing DNA. , 1986, Biochemistry.

[19]  A. Riggs,et al.  On the assay, isolation and characterization of the lac repressor. , 1968, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  D. Galas,et al.  Genetic analysis of transpositions in the lac region of Escherichia coli. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  A. Fersht,et al.  Protein Folding and Unfolding at Atomic Resolution , 2002, Cell.

[23]  J. Chen,et al.  Subunit dissociation affects DNA binding in a dimeric lac repressor produced by C-terminal deletion. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[24]  S Sugai,et al.  An early immunoreactive folding intermediate of the tryptophan synthase β2 subunit is a ‘molten globule’ , 1990, FEBS letters.

[25]  H. Roder,et al.  Kinetic role of early intermediates in protein folding. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  J. Monod,et al.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. , 1961, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  W. Gilbert,et al.  The lac operator is DNA. , 1967, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  Dimerisation mutants of Lac repressor. I. A monomeric mutant, L251A, that binds Lac operator DNA as a dimer. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  J. Beechem,et al.  Resolution of the fluorescence decay of the two tryptophan residues of lac repressor using single tryptophan mutants. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[30]  T. Steitz,et al.  Crystal structure of lac repressor core tetramer and its implications for DNA looping. , 1995, Science.

[31]  J. Chen,et al.  Deletion of lactose repressor carboxyl-terminal domain affects tetramer formation. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[32]  I. E. Sánchez,et al.  Formation of on- and off-pathway intermediates in the folding kinetics of Azotobacter vinelandii apoflavodoxin. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[33]  K. Matthews,et al.  Characterization and modification of a monomeric mutant of the lactose repressor protein. , 1986, Biochemistry.

[34]  K. Matthews,et al.  Lactose repressor protein: functional properties and structure. , 1998, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[35]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Prediction of folding mechanism for circular-permuted proteins. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Cecilia Clementi,et al.  Optimal combination of theory and experiment for the characterization of the protein folding landscape of S6: how far can a minimalist model go? , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  N. Oppenheimer,et al.  Structure and mechanism , 1989 .

[38]  J. Onuchic,et al.  How native-state topology affects the folding of dihydrofolate reductase and interleukin-1beta. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Matthews Cr.  PATHWAYS OF PROTEIN FOLDING , 1993 .

[40]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Protein folding: bringing theory and experiment closer together. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[41]  Cecilia Clementi,et al.  Quantifying the roughness on the free energy landscape: entropic bottlenecks and protein folding rates. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  P. Wittung-Stafshede,et al.  The largest protein observed to fold by two-state kinetic mechanism does not obey contact-order correlation. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[43]  D Baker,et al.  Topology, stability, sequence, and length: defining the determinants of two-state protein folding kinetics. , 2000, Biochemistry.