Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science

This study explores the information processes and work situations of interdisciplinary scientists. The analysis focuses on structural and strategic elements of information exchange between intellectual domains. Interview data reveal that scientists undertake individual and cooperative boundary-crossing research. Four research modes are identified and associated with different approaches to seeking information and knowledge base development. Probing for information, consultation, and learning are among the scientists' central interdisciplinary research practices. In spite of these work strategies, research progress is complicated by the tension between researchers' efforts to maintain a broad perspective and a high level of productivity. Information initiatives can provide “leeway” to help researchers shift their efforts away from their core specialization to the peripheral domains that infuse their interdisciplinary work.

[1]  T. Gieryn,et al.  Boundaries of Science , 1995 .

[2]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[3]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology : sociology of science in the real world , 1988 .

[4]  Julie M. Hurd,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences: Implications for Library Organization , 1992 .

[5]  Susan E. Searing.  Meeting the Information Needs of Interdisciplinary Scholars: Issues for Administrators of Large University Libraries , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[6]  D. Chubin.  State of the Field The Conceptualization of Scientific Specialties , 1976 .

[7]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[8]  Joan H. Fujimura,et al.  Constructing `Do-able' Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment , 1987 .

[9]  D. Ellis.  Modeling the Information-Seeking Patterns of Academic Researchers: A Grounded Theory Approach , 1993, The Library Quarterly.

[10]  M. Dogan,et al.  Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. , 1992 .

[11]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[12]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Learning About the Information Seeking of Interdisciplinary Scholars and Students , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[13]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[14]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[15]  T. Gieryn.  Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[16]  M. Callon,et al.  From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis , 1983 .

[17]  Joan H. Fujimura,et al.  The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences , 1992 .

[18]  J. Klein,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. , 1991 .

[19]  Howard D. White,et al.  Literature Retrieval for Interdisciplinary Syntheses , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[20]  Judith Palmer,et al.  Scientists and Information: I. Using Cluster Analysis to identify Information Style , 1991, J. Documentation.

[21]  J. Law,et al.  A Co-Word Study of Artificial Intelligence , 1989 .

[22]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities , 1996 .

[23]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  A concept space approach to addressing the vocabulary problem in scientific information retrieval: an experiment on the worm community system , 1997 .

[24]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[25]  H. Small.  A Co-Citation Model of a Scientific Specialty: A Longitudinal Study of Collagen Research , 1977 .

[26]  John Whittaker,et al.  Creativity and Conformity in Science: Titles, Keywords and Co-word Analysis , 1989 .

[27]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[28]  J. M. Choi,et al.  Citation Analysis of Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication Patterns of Anthropology in the U.S.A. , 1988 .

[29]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co‐citation Context Analysis and the Structure of Paradigms , 1980, J. Documentation.

[30]  K. Knorr-Cetina.  The Manufacture of Knowledge , 1981 .

[31]  J. Ravetz.  Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems , 2020 .

[32]  T. Oko.  Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. , 1992 .

[33]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Information Work at the Boundaries of Science: Linking Library Services to Research Practices , 1996, Libr. Trends.