Removal torque of miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage--a preliminary report.

PURPOSE Implant anchors such as miniscrews and miniplates have been loaded immediately for anchorage during orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to measure the removal torque of immediately loaded miniscrews after clinical usage and to determine the possible factors associated with this value. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 29 patients with malocclusions, 46 miniscrews were removed, and removal torque was measured with a torque gauge. Removal torque values were subjected to statistical analysis for possible association of different clinical characteristics. RESULTS The mean removal torque value was 1.10 kg x cm, and removal torques for 50% of the implants were greater than 0.89 kg x cm (8.7 N x cm). Removal torque values were significantly higher in the mandible than in the maxilla. The removal torques of 15-mm and 17-mm miniscrews were significantly higher than those of 13-mm miniscrews. Therefore, the site of implantation and miniscrew length were important factors associated with removal torque. However, there was no significant correlation between the removal torque value and age, gender, healing time, or time in function. DISCUSSION When miniscrews are used as anchorage for uprighting tipped molars, excessive torque in a counterclockwise direction may loosen them. From the measurements obtained in this investigation, miniscrews can sufficiently sustain an uprighting moment. CONCLUSION The removal torque values of the majority of miniscrews in this study population when loaded immediately as orthodontic anchorage were greater than 0.89 kg x cm, and this was sufficient for these implants to fulfill their purpose as anchors in 3-dimensional tooth movements.

[1]  S. Kok,et al.  Intrusion of the overerupted upper left first and second molars by mini-implants with partial-fixed orthodontic appliances: a case report. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[2]  B. C. Pai,et al.  Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  Sang-Heng Kok,et al.  A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  Shouichi Miyawaki,et al.  Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  A. Jacobson.  A new anchorage site for the treatment of anterior open bite: zygomatic anchorage case report , 2002 .

[6]  A. Caputo,et al.  Removal torque of immediately loaded transitional endosseous implants in human subjects. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  Jae-Hyun Sung,et al.  A simple method of molar uprighting with micro-implant anchorage. , 2002, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[8]  R. Haas,et al.  Bicortical titanium screws for critical orthodontic anchorage in the mandible: a preliminary report on clinical applications. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  H. Mitani,et al.  Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  B Melsen,et al.  Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. , 1998, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[11]  R. Truhlar,et al.  Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. , 1997, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  A. Carr,et al.  Reverse-torque failure of screw-shaped implants in baboons after 6 months of healing. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[13]  M. Ueda,et al.  A comparative study of removal torque of endosseous implants in the fibula, iliac crest and scapula of cadavers: preliminary report. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  R Kanomi,et al.  Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. , 1997, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[15]  Sullivan Dy,et al.  The reverse-torque test: a clinical report. , 1996 .

[16]  P. Lake,et al.  Case report: implants as anchorage for molar uprighting and intrusion. , 1996, The Angle orthodontist.

[17]  L. Norton,et al.  Uprighting impacted second molars with segmented springs. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  Smith Dc.  Dental implants: materials and design considerations. , 1993 .

[19]  A Tjellström,et al.  Removal torque of osseointegrated craniofacial implants: a clinical study. , 1988, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. , 1987, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[21]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Patient selection and preparation , 1985 .

[22]  Creekmore Td,et al.  The possibility of skeletal anchorage. , 1983 .

[23]  C. Burstone,et al.  A segmental approach to mandibular molar uprighting. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[24]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[25]  L. Higley,et al.  A study of orthodontic anchorage possibilities in basal bone , 1945 .