Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating

Fibrotic rigidification following a myocardial infarct is known to impair cardiac output, and it is also known that cardiomyocytes on rigid culture substrates show a progressive loss of rhythmic beating. Here, isolated embryonic cardiomyocytes cultured on a series of flexible substrates show that matrices that mimic the elasticity of the developing myocardial microenvironment are optimal for transmitting contractile work to the matrix and for promoting actomyosin striation and 1-Hz beating. On hard matrices that mechanically mimic a post-infarct fibrotic scar, cells overstrain themselves, lack striated myofibrils and stop beating; on very soft matrices, cells preserve contractile beating for days in culture but do very little work. Optimal matrix leads to a strain match between cell and matrix, and suggests dynamic differences in intracellular protein structures. A `cysteine shotgun' method of labeling the in situ proteome reveals differences in assembly or conformation of several abundant cytoskeletal proteins, including vimentin, filamin and myosin. Combined with recent results, which show that stem cell differentiation is also highly sensitive to matrix elasticity, the methods and analyses might be useful in the culture and assessment of cardiogenesis of both embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. The results described here also highlight the need for greater attention to fibrosis and mechanical microenvironments in cell therapy and development.

[1]  A. Cumano,et al.  Forced Unfolding of Proteins Within Cells , 2007 .

[2]  N. Philp,et al.  Left-right asymmetric localization of flectin in the extracellular matrix during heart looping. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[3]  U. Aebi,et al.  Conserved segments 1A and 2B of the intermediate filament dimer: their atomic structures and role in filament assembly , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[4]  D. Sandwell BIHARMONIC SPLINE INTERPOLATION OF GEOS-3 AND SEASAT ALTIMETER DATA , 1987 .

[5]  V. Lemmon,et al.  Molecular characterization of a multi-promoter gene encoding a chicken filamin protein. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  E. Elson,et al.  Mechanical function of dystrophin in muscle cells , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[8]  J C Perriard,et al.  Myofibrillogenesis in the developing chicken heart: assembly of Z-disk, M-line and the thick filaments. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[9]  Aiping Du,et al.  Myofibrillogenesis in the first cardiomyocytes formed from isolated quail precardiac mesoderm. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[10]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Microtissue elasticity: measurements by atomic force microscopy and its influence on cell differentiation. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[11]  J. Sanger,et al.  Myofibrillogenesis visualized in living embryonic cardiomyocytes. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Aiping Du,et al.  How to build a myofibril , 2006, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[13]  Alex McFadden,et al.  Organization of fibroblasts in the heart , 2004, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[14]  J. Miller,et al.  Intermediate filaments in cardiac myogenesis: nestin in the developing mouse heart. , 1995, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[15]  G. Conrad,et al.  Subcellular compartmentalization of myosin isoforms in embryonic chick heart ventricle myocytes during cytokinesis. , 1991, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[16]  J. C. Ayoob,et al.  Use of green fluorescent proteins linked to cytoskeletal proteins to analyze myofibrillogenesis in living cells. , 1999, Methods in enzymology.

[17]  Manuel C. Peitsch,et al.  SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  V. Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. , 2012, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[19]  Yale E Goldman,et al.  Force generation in single conventional actomyosin complexes under high dynamic load. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[21]  J. Sanger,et al.  The premyofibril: evidence for its role in myofibrillogenesis. , 1994, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[22]  A. G. Gittenberger-de Groot,et al.  Epicardium-derived cells contribute a novel population to the myocardial wall and the atrioventricular cushions. , 1998, Circulation research.

[23]  J. Lin,et al.  Requirement of a novel gene, Xin, in cardiac morphogenesis. , 1999, Development.

[24]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[25]  Aravinda Thiagalingam,et al.  Organization of Myocardial Activation During Ventricular Fibrillation After Myocardial Infarction: Evidence for Sustained High-Frequency Sources , 2005, Circulation.

[26]  Aiping Du,et al.  Cardiac myofibrillogenesis inside intact embryonic hearts. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[27]  J. Sanger,et al.  Myofibrillogenesis in living cells microinjected with fluorescently labeled alpha-actinin , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  C. Rotsch,et al.  Dimensional and mechanical dynamics of active and stable edges in motile fibroblasts investigated by using atomic force microscopy. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  S. E. Jacobsen,et al.  Potential risks of bone marrow cell transplantation into infarcted hearts. , 2007, Blood.

[31]  D. Seliktar,et al.  Matrix stiffness affects spontaneous contraction of cardiomyocytes cultured within a PEGylated fibrinogen biomaterial. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[32]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Traction forces in locomoting cells. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[33]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[34]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Measuring the Elastic Properties of Thin Polymer Films with the Atomic Force Microscope , 1998 .

[35]  T. Yeates,et al.  Conformational dynamics of the SH1-SH2 helix in the transition states of myosin subfragment-1. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[36]  P. Doevendans,et al.  The human adult cardiomyocyte phenotype. , 2003, Cardiovascular research.

[37]  D A Winkelmann,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor. , 1993, Science.

[38]  R. Bukoski,et al.  Regulation of mitochondrial activity in cardiac cells. , 1985, Annual review of physiology.

[39]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[40]  G. Piazzesi,et al.  The size and the speed of the working stroke of muscle myosin and its dependence on the force , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  J. Humphrey,et al.  Regional mechanical properties of passive myocardium. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  Luis Vidali,et al.  Filamin A (FLNA) is required for cell–cell contact in vascular development and cardiac morphogenesis , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[44]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[45]  Lars S. Maier,et al.  Generation of Functional Murine Cardiac Myocytes From Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2008, Circulation.

[46]  N. Kaplowitz,et al.  The use of monochlorobimane to determine hepatic GSH levels and synthesis. , 1990, Analytical biochemistry.

[47]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[48]  A. Khaghani,et al.  Gene Profiling Changes in Cytoskeletal Proteins During Clinical Recovery After Left Ventricular–Assist Device Support , 2005, Circulation.

[49]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[50]  A. Houdusse,et al.  Atomic Structure of Scallop Myosin Subfragment S1 Complexed with MgADP A Novel Conformation of the Myosin Head , 1999, Cell.

[51]  W. Burns,et al.  Connective Tissue Growth Factor and Cardiac Fibrosis after Myocardial Infarction , 2005, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[52]  Timothy J Gardner,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[53]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[54]  William E Kraus,et al.  Apparent elastic modulus and hysteresis of skeletal muscle cells throughout differentiation. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[55]  Brenton D. Hoffman,et al.  The consensus mechanics of cultured mammalian cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  B. Zabel,et al.  Filamin A mutation is one cause of FG syndrome , 2007, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[57]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.