Spatial Dynamics of the Logistics Industry and Implications for Freight Flows

This project examines changes in the spatial pattern of warehousing and distribution (W&D) activities. W&D activities are decentralizing in response to rising land values and scale economies. Ultimately, the authors seek to understand whether these spatial shifts result in more truck VMT, or whether the efficiencies gained by larger scale operations allow offsetting savings, such as enabling the use of larger trucks or achieving higher average load factors. Understanding how these shifts are affecting truck VMT is essential for developing effective policies for managing truck VMT and their associated emissions. However, there is no good source for tract or zone level truck flow data, or for intra-metropolitan truck origin-destination data. As a first step, the authors focus on accessibility. From the literature on passenger travel, the authors know that travel distance is related to accessibility. Thus, changes in accessibility to goods markets should be a proxy for goods travel distance, all else equal. The authors examine changes in the spatial pattern of warehousing and distribution activities for the four largest California metropolitan areas: Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, and San Diego, using ZIP Code Business Patterns data for 2003 and 2013. The authors develop measures of decentralization and concentration. Their results are mixed. When using establishment counts, only Los Angeles shows a consistent pattern of decentralization. There is more evidence of decentralization when using employment counts, which is consistent with larger scale facilities being built at the periphery. Spatial patterns for the largest metro areas are quite different from those of the smaller metro areas. The authors surmise that higher development density and associated land prices push W&D activity to more distant areas. In contrast, W&D location in San Diego and Sacramento is relatively closer to employment, population, and the CBD. If all truck traffic were local, their results suggest possible increases in truck VMT, particularly for the largest metro areas. However, more than half of all commodity flows is non-local. The decentralization the authors observe is likely related to domestic and international trade, for which access to local markets is less important. More research is necessary to determine whether decentralization is a consistent trend in large metro areas, and, if so, whether impacts on truck VMT within metro areas is positive or negative.View the NCST Project Webpage

[1]  Markus Hesse,et al.  The System of Flows and the Re-Structuring of Space. Elements of a Geography of Distribution. , 2007 .

[2]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Transportation and the Geographical and Functional Integration of Global Production Networks , 2006 .

[3]  G. Giuliano,et al.  SUBCENTERS IN THE LOS ANGELES REGION , 1991 .

[4]  Markus Hesse,et al.  Global Chain, Local Pain: Regional Implications of Global Distribution Networks in the German North Range , 2006 .

[5]  K. Small,et al.  URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE. , 1997 .

[6]  F. Hahn,et al.  Location and Space-Economy. , 1958 .

[7]  Peter Hall,et al.  Reexploring the Interface between Economic and Transport Geography , 2006 .

[8]  Laetitia Dablanc,et al.  The impacts of logistics sprawl: How does the location of parcel transport terminals affect the energy efficiency of goods’ movements in Paris and what can we do about it? , 2010 .

[9]  Laetitia Dablanc,et al.  Urban freight consultations in the Paris region , 2011 .

[10]  W. G. Hansen How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[11]  Roy E. Welsch,et al.  Logistics agglomeration in the US , 2014 .

[12]  G. Giuliano,et al.  The Freight Landscape: Using Secondary Data Sources to Describe Metropolitan Freight Flows , 2015 .

[13]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Green Logistics ( The Paradoxes of ) , 2003 .

[14]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Transition to B2B e-Marketplace Enabled Supply Chain: Readiness Assessment and Success Factors , 2009 .

[15]  José Holguín-Veras,et al.  Freight Generation, Freight Trip Generation, and Perils of Using Constant Trip Rates , 2011 .

[16]  Shunfeng Song,et al.  Modelling Worker Residence Distribution in the Los Angeles Region Modelling Worker Residence Distribution in the Los Angeles Region , 2022 .

[17]  Catherine L. Ross,et al.  Atlanta: a mega logistics center in the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion (PAM) , 2012 .

[18]  Anne Goodchild,et al.  Logistics Sprawl , 2014 .

[19]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  The Thruport concept and transmodal rail freight distribution in North America , 2008 .

[20]  Alan C. McKinnon,et al.  The present and future land requirements of logistical activities , 2009 .

[21]  D. Carlton,et al.  The Location and Employment Choices of New Firms: An Econometric Model with Discrete and Continuous Endogenous Variables , 1983 .

[22]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[23]  Julian Allen,et al.  Investigating relationships between road freight transport, facility location, logistics management and urban form , 2012 .

[24]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  FREIGHT, GATEWAYS AND MEGA-URBAN REGIONS: THE LOGISTICAL INTEGRATION OF THE BOSTWASH CORRIDOR1: FREIGHT, GATEWAYS AND MEGA-URBAN REGIONS , 2004 .

[25]  G. Giuliano,et al.  Accessibility, Location and Employment Center Growth , 2015 .

[26]  A. Sood,et al.  Location matters. , 2006, Gynecologic oncology.

[27]  Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod,et al.  Empirical Studies in Industrial Location: An Assessment of Their Methods and Results , 2009 .

[28]  Tetsuro Hyodo,et al.  Locational dynamics of logistics facilities: Evidence from Tokyo , 2015 .

[29]  Laetitia Dablanc,et al.  Logistics Sprawl in North America: Methodological Issues and a Case Study in Toronto , 2015 .

[30]  M. Hesse,et al.  The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution , 2004 .

[31]  Julian Allen,et al.  University of Westminster Eprints , 2006 .

[32]  Y. Sheffi,et al.  Relationship between freight accessibility and logistics employment in US counties , 2013 .

[33]  John T. Bowen,et al.  Moving places: the geography of warehousing in the US , 2008 .

[34]  Julie L Cidell,et al.  Concentration and decentralization: The new geography of freight distribution in US metropolitan areas , 2010 .

[35]  Julie L Cidell,et al.  Distribution Centers among the Rooftops: The Global Logistics Network Meets the Suburban Spatial Imaginary , 2011 .