Short-term Spark or Sustained Impact? Investigating the Long-term Effect of Real-time Feedback

In order to adopt sustainable practices and strategies, organizations and individuals need to understand the environmental impact of their behavior and the knowledge about successful resource conservation strategies. Information Systems research and real-time feedback systems in particular can help to bridge this "environmental literacy gap”. In previous work, we presented an IS artifact that presents consumers with behavior-specific information on their energy and water consumption in real time. We found that this approach reduces energy and water consumption by 22%. In this work-inprogress paper, we address the open question of effect persistence in the long term. We analyze 17,612 data points collected in a 12-month field study from 50 households. First analyses indicate that the effect remains stable over time. In line with literature on “data push” systems, we argue that feedback systems should not require an additional step of user action to access the feedback which may be a barrier to longer effect persistence of information systems.

[1]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Colin McKerracher,et al.  Energy consumption feedback in perspective: integrating Australian data to meta-analyses on in-home displays , 2013 .

[3]  I. Ayres,et al.  Evidence from Two Large Field Experiments that Peer Comparison Feedback Can Reduce Residential Energy Usage , 2009 .

[4]  Corinna Fischer Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? , 2008 .

[5]  S. S. van Dam,et al.  Home energy monitors: impact over the medium-term , 2010 .

[6]  H. Allcott,et al.  The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation , 2012 .

[7]  Rodney Anthony Stewart,et al.  Alarming visual display monitors affecting shower end use water and energy conservation in Australian residential households. , 2010 .

[8]  Leyland F. Pitt,et al.  Integrating the smartphone into a sound environmental information systems strategy: Principles, practices and a research agenda , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Behavior and Energy Policy , 2010, Science.

[10]  Thomas Grechenig,et al.  "show-me": water consumption at a glance to promote water conservation in the shower , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[11]  J. Schleich,et al.  Effects of feedback on residential electricity demand: Findings from a field trial in Austria , 2013 .

[12]  Verena Tiefenbeck,et al.  Mechatronics to drive environmental sustainability: Measuring, visualizing and transforming consumer patterns on a large scale , 2013, IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[13]  Shahzeen Z Attari,et al.  Perceptions of water use , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Sarah Diefenbach,et al.  With a little help from a friend: a shower calendar to save water , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  The Short List: The Most Effective Actions U.S. Households Can Take to Curb Climate Change , 2008 .

[16]  Gj Raw,et al.  Energy Demand Research Project: final analysis , 2011 .

[17]  Eric Paulos,et al.  UpStream: motivating water conservation with low-cost water flow sensing and persuasive displays , 2010, CHI.

[18]  Nigel Melville,et al.  Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability , 2010, MIS Q..

[19]  Ernesto Arroyo,et al.  Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink , 2005, CHI.

[20]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  An experimental test of voluntary strategies to promote urban water demand management. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  James A. Landay,et al.  The design of eco-feedback technology , 2010, CHI.