Prospective evaluation of pin site infections in 39 patients treated with external ring fixation

Abstract Introduction: Pin site infection is a common complication to external ring fixation. While the aetiology is well described, monitoring of onset, location, and the distribution of infection among the pin sites still needs further attention. The present pilot study evaluates the feasibility of a prospective registration procedure for reporting, evaluating, and monitoring of pin site infections in patients treated with external ring fixation. This may promote communication between team members and assist decision-making regarding treatment. Methods: A total of 39 trauma, limb deformity, and bone infection patients (15 female, 24 males; mean age 49 years (range: 12–88)) treated with external ring fixation were followed in the outpatient clinic using the pin site registration tool. Pin site infection (Checketts and Otterburn (CO) grade, onset, location), use of oral or intravenous antibiotics, and any unplanned procedures due to pin sites complications (wire removal and/or replacement, premature frame removal, amputation, etc.) were registered until frame removal. Results: The mean (SD) frame time was 164 (83) d (range: 44–499). We performed 3296 observations of 568 pin sites. Pin infection was registered in 171 of the 568 pin sites (30 %), of which 112 (65 %) were categorized as CO 1, 42 (25 %) as CO 2, 9 (5 %) as CO 3, and 8 (5 %) as CO 5. Neither CO 4 nor CO 6 was observed. A total of 35 patients (90 %) encountered CO 1–3 at least once during the observation time, while 1 patient (2.5 %) developed a major infection at eight pin sites (CO 5). Antibiotics were administered to 22/39 (56 %) of the patients. Conclusion: In an effort to monitor pin site infections in this complex patient group and to ensure the best clinical outcomes, our registration procedure in the outpatient clinic helped to recognize pin site infections early and eased communication between team members providing a concise overview of the treatment course.

[1]  D. Ferguson,et al.  The PINS Trial: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing a traditional versus an emollient skincare regimen for the care of pin-sites in patients with circular frames. , 2021, The bone & joint journal.

[2]  C. Iobst.  Pin-track infections: Past, present, and future , 2017 .

[3]  D. Ceroni,et al.  From prevention of pin-tract infection to treatment of osteomyelitis during paediatric external fixation , 2016, Journal of children's orthopaedics.

[4]  J. Jauregui,et al.  Life- and limb-threatening infections following the use of an external fixator. , 2015, The bone & joint journal.

[5]  J. Temple,et al.  Pin site care for preventing infections associated with external bone fixators and pins. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  L. Marais,et al.  Prevention and management of external fixator pin track sepsis , 2012, Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction.

[7]  D. Marsh,et al.  The "Good, Bad and Ugly" pin site grading system: A reliable and memorable method for documenting and monitoring ring fixator pin sites. , 2010, Injury.

[8]  E. Zwick,et al.  Pin tract infection with external fixation of pediatric fractures. , 2007, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[9]  M. Patterson.  Multicenter Pin Care Study , 2005, Orthopedic nursing.

[10]  S. Nayagam,et al.  The care of pin sites with external fixation. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Pin site care in external fixation sodium chloride or chlorhexidine solution as a cleansing agent , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[12]  V. Caja,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-coated external-fixation pins. The effect on pin loosening and pin-track infection in leg lengthening for short stature. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  No difference between daily and weekly pin site careA randomized study of 50 patients with external fixation , 2003 .

[14]  S. Stapley,et al.  Fluid accumulation and the rapid spread of bacteria in the pathogenesis of external fixator pin track infection. , 2001, Injury.

[15]  M. Sims,et al.  Pin-site care. , 2000, Nursing times.

[16]  Watson Jt,et al.  High-energy fractures of the tibial plateau , 1994 .

[17]  J. Watson.  Treatment of unstable fractures of the shaft of the tibia. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  J. Watson.  High-energy fractures of the tibial plateau. , 1994, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[19]  H L Tucker,et al.  Management of unstable open and closed tibial fractures using the Ilizarov method. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Pediatric applications of the Ilizarov method. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  David M. Wall,et al.  Management of segmental defects by the Ilizarov intercalary bone transport method. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  S. Green.  Ilizarov method. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  S A Green,et al.  Complications of external skeletal fixation. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.