Design and Use of a Rubric to Assess and Encourage Interactive Qualities in Distance Courses

Distance learning theory and research holds that interaction is an essential characteristic of successful distance learning courses. However, the lack of definition as to what constitutes observable, measurable interactive qualities in distance learning courses has prevented transfer from theory and research to design practices and has hindered research on ways to improve interactive qualities of courses. In this article the authors describe how findings from theory and research were used to develop a rubric for assessing interactive qualities in distance courses. The rubric is presented, along with data from formative uses of the instrument in distance learning courses. Current and anticipated applications of the rubric include use by students as part of postcourse evaluations and by researchers and instructors as a tool to allow more meaningful examination of the role of interaction in enhancing achievement and student satisfaction in distance learning courses.

[1]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Growing Up: Digital: How the Web Changes Work, Education, and the Ways People Learn , 2000 .

[2]  Linda L. Wolcott.  A Learner-Centered Approach to Distance Education , 1996 .

[3]  E. Wagner.  Interactivity: From Agents to Outcomes. , 1997 .

[4]  M. Moore.  Editorial: Three types of interaction , 1989 .

[5]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[6]  Michael Yacci,et al.  Interactivity Demystified: A Structural Definition for Distance Education and Intelligent Computer-based Instruction. , 2000 .

[7]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[8]  Georges Van der Perre,et al.  Research in Open and Distance Learning , 2000 .

[9]  David R. Moore,et al.  Building Interactivity into Web Courses: Tools for Social and Instructional Interaction. , 1998 .

[10]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 1998 .

[11]  Chip Kimball,et al.  Am I On the Mark? Technology Planning for the E-Rate. , 1998 .

[12]  Dina Horn,et al.  Distance education: Is interactivity compromised? , 1994 .

[13]  Muhammad K. Betz.  Distance Education : A Systems View , 2005 .

[14]  John G. Hedberg,et al.  Learning Technologies: Prospects and Pathways. Selected papers from EdTech '96 Biennial Conference of the Australian Society for Educational Technology (Melbourne, Australia, July 7-10, 1996). , 1996 .

[15]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[16]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Simonson on the five themes at the foundation of Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education , 2002 .

[17]  Barbara G. Zirkin,et al.  Interactive or Non-interactive? That Is the Question!!! An Annotated Bibliography. , 2008 .

[18]  R. Clark.  Evidence for confounding in computer-based instruction studies: Analyzing the meta-analyses , 1985 .

[19]  R. Kozma.  Learning with Media , 1991 .

[20]  R. Kozma.  Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate , 1994 .

[21]  Lindsay Hewson,et al.  Online Interactions: Developing a Neglected Aspect of the Virtual Classroom. , 1998 .

[22]  R. Garrison.  Theoretical Challenges for Distance Education in the 21st Century: A Shift from Structural to Transactional Issues , 2000 .

[23]  M. Kimeldorf.  Teaching Online--Techniques and Methods. , 1995 .

[24]  C. Fulford,et al.  Perceptions of Interaction: The critical predictor in distance education , 1993 .

[25]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[26]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[27]  Atsusi Hirumi,et al.  Interactivity, Distance Education, and Instructional Systems Design Converge on the Information Superhighway , 1996 .

[28]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  When researchers swim upstream: reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media , 1991 .

[29]  Ellen D. Wagner,et al.  In Support of a Functional Definition of Interaction , 1994 .

[30]  Catherine Fulford,et al.  Are Interaction Time and Psychological Interactivity the Same Thing in the Distance Learning Television Classroom , 1994 .

[31]  Daniel C. A. Hillman,et al.  Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners , 1994 .

[32]  William R. Klemm,et al.  Eight Ways To Get Students More Engaged in Online Conferences. , 1998 .

[33]  José Bidarra,et al.  Current Developments and Best Practice in Open and Distance Learning , 2000 .

[34]  Herbert W. Broda,et al.  Rubrics: A Handbook for Construction and Use , 1999 .

[35]  M. Roblyer.  A Rubric to Encourage and Assess Student Engagement in Online Course Conferences , 2002 .

[36]  Kathleen Barclay.  Humanizing learning-at-distance , 2001 .

[37]  David J. Zimmerman,et al.  Where is Aggressive Price Competition Taking Higher Education? , 2000 .

[38]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Factors influencing interaction in an online course , 1999 .