Empathic Exchanges in Online Cancer Support Groups: Distinguishing Message Expression and Reception Effects

Past studies on the efficacy of participation in online cancer support groups have primarily focused on the role of expression in the accrual of health benefits for participants. Unfortunately, few steps have been taken to determine whether this observed effect arises solely from the internal mental processes underlying the act of expressing or, perhaps, owes something to a nuanced, multidimensional understanding of expression that includes reception of responses to what is expressed. To test for the multilayered effect, we attend to one of the key concepts in the online support community scholarship: empathy. Our findings suggest that it is a combination of empathy expression and reception that is crucial to attaining optimal benefits for cancer patients. Further, our finding supports the buffering hypothesis that empathic expression provides a salutary effect for patients who experienced a higher degree of concern associated with their cancer diagnosis and follow-up treatments.

[1]  G. W. Walster,et al.  New directions in equity research. , 1973 .

[2]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[3]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[4]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Empathy, sympathy, and altruism: Empirical and conceptual links. , 1987 .

[5]  K. Maton,et al.  Social support, organizational characteristics, psychological well-being, and group appraisal in three self-help group populations , 1988, American journal of community psychology.

[6]  N. Frijda,et al.  Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness , 1989 .

[7]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Opening up : the healing power of expressing emotions , 1990 .

[8]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[9]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[10]  G. Zimet,et al.  The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support: a confirmation study. , 1991, Journal of clinical psychology.

[11]  B. Andersen.  Psychological interventions for cancer patients to enhance the quality of life. , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  R. Levenson,et al.  Empathy: a physiological substrate. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  M. Hoffman,et al.  The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment , 1993 .

[14]  J. Suhr,et al.  Social support communication in the context of marriage: An analysis of couples' supportive interactions. , 1994 .

[15]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[16]  Steven E. Finkel,et al.  Causal Analysis With Panel Data , 1995, SAGE Research Methods Foundations.

[17]  R. C. Silver,et al.  Social constraints, intrusive thoughts, and depressive symptoms among bereaved mothers. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Clara E. Hill,et al.  The current state of empathy research , 1996 .

[19]  Empathy and the Practice of Medicine , 1996, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[20]  D. Spiegel,et al.  Psychosocial aspects of breast cancer treatment. , 1997, Seminars in oncology.

[21]  D S Tulsky,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  C. Koopman,et al.  Social support, life stress, pain and emotional adjustment to advanced breast cancer , 1998, Psycho-oncology.

[23]  Vincent R. Waldron,et al.  Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. , 1999, Health communication.

[24]  D. Luke,et al.  Giving and Receiving Help: Interpersonal Transactions in Mutual-Help Meetings and Psychosocial Adjustment of Members , 1999, American journal of community psychology.

[25]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Experiences of Women with Breast Cancer: Exchanging Social Support over the CHESS Computer Network , 2000, Journal of health communication.

[26]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The internet and health communication : experience and expectations , 2001 .

[27]  R. Josselson,et al.  The Experience of Empathy in Everyday Relationships: Cognitive and Affective Elements , 2001 .

[28]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  News Framing and Cueing of Issue Regimes: Explaining Clinton's Public Approval in Spite of Scandal , 2002 .

[29]  Gregory Makoul,et al.  Empathic communication and gender in the physician-patient encounter. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[30]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Empathy as an Interpersonal Phenomenon , 2003 .

[31]  Jason E. Owen,et al.  Use of the Internet for Information and Support: Disclosure Among Persons with Breast and Prostate Cancer , 2004, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[32]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Internet Community Group Participation: Psychosocial Benefits for Women with Breast Cancer , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  W. Ickes.  Empathic Accuracy , 2005 .

[34]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Use and Impact of eHealth System by Low-income Women With Breast Cancer , 2005, Journal of health communication.

[35]  Suzanne Pingree,et al.  Effects of Insightful Disclosure Within Computer Mediated Support Groups on Women With Breast Cancer , 2006, Health communication.

[36]  B. Goldstein,et al.  Not all negative emotions are equal: the role of emotional expression in online support groups for women with breast cancer , 2006, Psycho-oncology.

[37]  M. Fishbein,et al.  The Role of Theory in Developing Effective Health Communications , 2006 .

[38]  Jeong Yeob Han,et al.  Effects of prayer and religious expression within computer support groups on women with breast cancer , 2007, Psycho-oncology.

[39]  Raymond J. Pingree.  How Messages Affect Their Senders: A More General Model of Message Effects and Implications for Deliberation , 2007 .

[40]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[41]  B. Rimer,et al.  How Cancer Survivors Provide Support on Cancer-Related Internet Mailing Lists , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[42]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Patterns of empathy in online communication , 2007, CHI.

[43]  Jeong Yeob Han,et al.  Expressing Positive Emotions within Online Support Groups by Women with Breast Cancer , 2008, Journal of health psychology.

[44]  J. Bensing,et al.  Older cancer patients' information and support needs surrounding treatment: An evaluation through the eyes of patients, relatives and professionals , 2009, BMC nursing.

[45]  N. Kanas.  The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. , 2011, International journal of group psychotherapy.

[46]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  The Dark Side of Close Relationships , 2013 .

[47]  U. G. Dailey.  Cancer,Facts and Figures about. , 2022, Journal of the National Medical Association.