Liaison acquisition, word segmentation and construction in French: a usage-based account

ABSTRACT In the linguistics field, liaison in French is interpreted as an indicator of interactions between the various levels of language organization. The current study examines the same issue while adopting a developmental perspective. Five experiments involving children aged two to six years provide evidence for a developmental scenario which interrelates a number of different issues: the acquisition of phonological alternations, the segmentation of new words, the long-term stabilization of the word form in the lexicon and the formation of item-based constructions. According to this scenario, children favour the presence of initial CV syllables when segmenting stored chunks of speech of the type word1-liaison-word2 (les arbres ‘the trees’ is segmented as /le/+/zarbr/). They cope with the variation of the liaison in the input by memorizing multiple exemplars of the same word2 (/zarbr/, /narbr/). They learn the correct relations between the word1s and the word2 exemplars through exposure to the well-formed sequence (un+/narbr/, deux+/zarbr/). They generalize the relation between a word1 and a class of word2 exemplars beginning with a specific liaison consonant by integrating this information into an item-based schema (e.g. un+/nX/, deux+/zX/). This model is based on the idea that the segmentation of new words and the development of syntactic schemas are two aspects of the same process.

[1]  Joseph Paul Stemberger,et al.  Phonological priming and irregular past , 2004 .

[2]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition. , 1997 .

[3]  J. Stemberger,et al.  Handbook of Phonological Development: From the Perspective of Constraint-Based Nonlinear Phonology , 1999 .

[4]  C. Judd,et al.  Data analysis: continuing issues in the everyday analysis of psychological data. , 1995, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  Jean-Pierre Angoujard,et al.  Phonologie : champs et perspectives , 2003 .

[6]  J. Stemberger Wordshape errors in language production , 1990, Cognition.

[7]  J. Pine,et al.  Slot and frame patterns and the development of the determiner category , 1997, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[8]  Margareta Almgren,et al.  Research on child language acquisition : proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language , 2001 .

[9]  Bernard Tranel,et al.  Aspects de la phonologie du français et la théorie de l'optimalité , 2000 .

[10]  A. Cutler,et al.  Processing resyllabified words in French , 2003 .

[11]  Stefan Ploch,et al.  Living on the Edge: 28 Papers in Honour of Jonathan Kaye , 2003 .

[12]  M. Fayol,et al.  La liaison : de la phonologie à la cognition , 2005 .

[13]  Le statut lexical des consonnes de liaison , 2005 .

[14]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[15]  J. Pine,et al.  Reanalysing rote-learned phrases: individual differences in the transition to multi-word speech , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  E. Morel traitement de la liaison chez l'enfant : études expérimentales , 1994, Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique.

[17]  B MacWhinney,et al.  Phonological priming in children's picture naming , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[18]  Louis-Jean Boë,et al.  De A à Zut : dictionnaire phonétique du français parlé , 1992 .

[19]  Susan Foster-Cohen,et al.  CONSTRUCTING A LANGUAGE: A USAGE-BASED THEORY OF LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[20]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency effects on French liaison , 2001 .

[21]  Christine Moisset Variable liaison in Parisian French , 2000 .

[22]  Boris New,et al.  Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE , 2001 .

[23]  Adele E. Goldberg Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Jean-Christophe Verstraete Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .

[25]  André Malécot French Liaison as a Function of Grammatical, Phonetic and Paralinguistic Variables , 1975 .

[26]  Pierre Encrevé,et al.  La liaison avec et sans enchaînement : phonologie tridimensionnelle et usages du français , 1988 .

[27]  M. Fayol,et al.  Production et jugement des liaisons obligatoires chez des enfants tout-venant et des enfants atteints de troubles du langage : décalages développementaux et différences interindividuelles , 2007 .

[28]  D. Slobin The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .

[29]  Le traitement cognitif de la liaison dans la reconnaissance de la parole enchaînée , 2005 .

[30]  F. Grosjean,et al.  L'effet de l'enchaînement sur la reconnaissance des mots dans la parole continue , 1996 .

[31]  Y. Morin Remarks on prenominal liaison consonants in French , 2003 .

[32]  Céline Dugua,et al.  Pour un modèle de l'acquisition des liaisons basé sur l'usage : trois études de cas , 2007 .

[33]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Do infants segment words or recurring contiguous patterns? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Céline Dugua Liaison, segmentation lexicale et schémas syntaxiques entre 2 et 6 ans : un modèle développemental basé sur l'usage , 2006 .

[35]  Jean-Philippe Goldman,et al.  Liaison and schwa deletion in French: an effect of lexical frequency and competition? , 2001, INTERSPEECH.

[36]  Sanford A. Schane,et al.  French phonology and morphology , 1969 .