Motivated Rejection of Science

Some scientifically well-established results—such as the fact that emission of greenhouse gases produces global warming—are rejected by sizable proportions of the population in the United States and other countries. Rejection of scientific findings is mostly driven by motivated cognition: People tend to reject findings that threaten their core beliefs or worldview. At present, rejection of scientific findings by the U.S. public is more prevalent on the political right than the left. Yet the cognitive mechanisms driving rejection of science, such as the superficial processing of evidence toward the desired interpretation, are found regardless of political orientation. General education and scientific literacy do not mitigate rejection of science but, rather, increase the polarization of opinions along partisan lines. In contrast, specific knowledge about the mechanisms underlying a scientific result—such as human-made climate change—can increase the acceptance of that result.

[1]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change as a Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence , 2015, PloS one.

[2]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn’t, and Why? An Experimental Study of the Mechanisms of Cultural Cognition , 2010, Law and human behavior.

[3]  Gregory N. Mandel,et al.  The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks , 2012 .

[4]  E. Miller,et al.  Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story , 1998, The Lancet.

[5]  Matthew G. Chin,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Conspiracy Theories, Paranormal Beliefs, and Pseudoscience Acceptance Among a University Population , 2014 .

[6]  L. Hamilton Conservative and Liberal Views of Science, Does Trust Depend on Topic? , 2015 .

[7]  D. Kahan Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem , 2015 .

[8]  Michael F. Dahlstrom Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Second dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: questionnaire survey of health professionals , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Justin Lewis,et al.  Journalists and jabs: Media coverage of the MMR vaccine , 2004, Communication & medicine.

[11]  A. Grimwood,et al.  Denying AIDS: conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and human tragedy , 2010, AIDS care.

[12]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[13]  Martin McKee,et al.  Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond? , 2008, European journal of public health.

[14]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks , 2013, The American behavioral scientist.

[15]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Correction: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  S. Gruskin,et al.  Estimating the lost benefits of antiretroviral drug use in South Africa. , 2008, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[17]  Robert J. Brulle,et al.  Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010 , 2012, Climatic Change.

[18]  Gilles E. Gignac,et al.  The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science , 2013 .

[19]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Recurrent fury: Conspiratorial discourse in the blogosphere triggered by research on the role of conspiracist ideation in climate denial , 2015 .

[20]  Katherine Kenny Golden holocaust: Origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition , 2012 .

[21]  A. Lupia Communicating science in politicized environments , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Robert J. Brulle Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations , 2014, Climatic Change.

[23]  D. Kammen,et al.  Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature , 2013 .

[24]  David M Salisbury,et al.  Tracking mothers' attitudes to MMR immunisation 1996-2006. , 2007, Vaccine.

[25]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Rational Irrationality: Modeling Climate Change Belief Polarization Using Bayesian Networks , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[26]  L. Hamilton,et al.  Trust in Scientists on Climate Change and Vaccines , 2015 .

[27]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy , 2003 .

[28]  Martin McKee,et al.  How the growth of denialism undermines public health , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States , 2011 .

[30]  G. Gauchat Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere , 2012 .

[31]  L. Hamilton,et al.  Tracking Public Beliefs About Anthropogenic Climate Change , 2015, PloS one.

[32]  S. Kulkarni,et al.  Transformation of a Star into a Planet in a Millisecond Pulsar Binary , 2011, Science.

[33]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Examining the Effectiveness of Climate Change Frames in the Face of a Climate Change Denial Counter-Frame , 2015, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government , 2017, Behavioural Public Policy.

[35]  Michael Andrew Ranney,et al.  Climate Change Conceptual Change: Scientific Information Can Transform Attitudes , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  A Dirty Word or a Dirty World? , 2010, Psychological science.

[37]  Xiaoli Nan,et al.  When Vaccines Go Viral: An Analysis of HPV Vaccine Coverage on YouTube , 2012, Health communication.

[38]  Unidentified The Debunking Handbook , 2012 .

[39]  Lawrence C. Hamilton,et al.  Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects , 2011 .

[40]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Reporting of MMR evidence in professional publications: 1988–2007 , 2009, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[41]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  The Rise of Global Warming Skepticism: Exploring Affective Image Associations in the United States Over Time , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[42]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science , 2013, PloS one.

[43]  T. V. Pollet,et al.  Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories , 2015 .

[44]  Patrick Sturgis,et al.  Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis , 2008 .