Selective adaptation for acoustic cues of voicing in initial stops

Abstract: Recent experiments have indicated that perceptual adaptation effects can be obtained for a series of CV syllables (e.g. [ba–[pha]) varying along the acoustic dimension of Voice Onset Time (VOT), defined as the interval between the onset of the consonant release burst and the onset of voicing. These adaptation effects have led researchers to postulate the existence of a small set of linguistic feature detectors, each sensitive to a restricted range of Voice Onset Time values. However, another acoustic cue for voice-voiceless distinctions among the initial stop consonants, namely the presence or absence of significant formant transitions following the onset of voicing, covaried with absolute VOT in each of the previous adaptation experiments. In this study, differential adaptation effects are obtained along a VOT test dimension by presenting adapting stimuli which contain different amounts of formant transitions after voicing onset but which contain the same absolute VOT. The results indicate that the original adaptation effects are partly attributable to the presence or absence of the formant transitions after voicing onset, rather than to VOT per se. The present results may be attributable to adaptation of a detector sensitive to a weighted combination of the two hypothetical cues of VOT and the duration of voiced transitions.

[1]  G. H. Slusser,et al.  Statistical analysis in psychology and education , 1960 .

[2]  H. Helson Adaptation-level theory : an experimental and systematic approach to behavior , 1964 .

[3]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  A “labial” feature analyzer in speech perception , 1974 .

[4]  M. Haggard,et al.  Pitch as a voicing cue. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[6]  A. Ades,et al.  How phonetic is selective adaptation? Experiments on syllable position and vowel environment , 1974 .

[7]  W. Cooper,et al.  Adaptation of phonetic feature analyzers for place of articulation. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  WILLIAM E. COOPER,et al.  Feature processing in the perception and production of speech , 1974, Nature.

[9]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Contingent feature analysis in speech perception , 1974 .

[10]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors , 1973 .

[11]  A E Ades,et al.  Bilateral component in speech perception? , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Category Boundaries for Speech and Nonspeech Sounds , 1974 .

[13]  K. Stevens,et al.  Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  L. Riggs,et al.  Electrical Measures and Psychophysical Data on Human Vision , 1972 .

[15]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Vocal-tract characteristics of the stop cognates. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Peter D. Eimas,et al.  Some properties of linguistic feature detectors , 1973 .

[17]  R. Fox,et al.  Binocular detection of positive and negative flashes , 1974 .

[18]  L. Lisker,et al.  Voice-Timing Perception in Spanish Word-Initial Stops. , 1973 .

[19]  A. Liberman,et al.  The discrimination of relative onset-time of the components of certain speech and nonspeech patterns. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.