Changing votes or changing voters? How candidates and election context swing voters and mobilize the base

Abstract To win elections, candidates attempt to mobilize supporters and persuade swing voters. With what magnitude each operates across American elections is not clear. I argue that the influence of swing voters should depend upon change in the candidates across elections and that the consequences of changes in composition should depend upon the relative balance of campaign expenditures. I estimate a Bayesian hierarchical model on Florida electoral data for house, governor, and senate contests. Swing voters contribute on average 4.1 percentage points to change in party vote shares, while change in turnout influences outcomes by 8.6 points. The effect of swing voters is increasing in the divergence between the Democrat and Republican candidates. Candidates increasingly benefit from the votes of occasional voters as the relative balance of campaign spending increases in their favor. More broadly, the effects of swing voters and turnout are not constant features of American elections, instead varying across time and space in ways related to candidates and context.

[1]  Tim Groseclose,et al.  A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage , 2001 .

[2]  Robert S. Erikson.  State Turnout and Presidential Voting , 1995 .

[3]  P. Converse,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[4]  Anthony Moretti.  The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns , 2010 .

[5]  Sarah F. Anzia.  The Election Timing Effect: Evidence from a Policy Intervention in Texas , 2012 .

[6]  D. Green,et al.  The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[7]  Adam Bonica.  Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace , 2012 .

[8]  W. P. Shively.  The Electoral Impact of Party Loyalists and the "Floating Vote": A New Measure and a New Perspective , 1982, The Journal of Politics.

[9]  J. Wakefield.  Ecological inference for 2 × 2 tables (with discussion) , 2004 .

[10]  Martyn Plummer,et al.  JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling , 2003 .

[11]  J. Citrin,et al.  What if Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections , 2003 .

[12]  W. D. Burnham.  The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe , 1965, American Political Science Review.

[13]  HajnalZoltan,et al.  Where Turnout Matters: The Consequences of Uneven Turnout in City Politics , 2014 .

[14]  James M. Enelow,et al.  The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction , 1984 .

[15]  Jeffrey B. Lewis.  Ecological Inference: Extending King's Ecological Inference Model to Multiple Elections Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2004 .

[16]  Philip E. Converse,et al.  INFORMATION FLOW AND THE STABILITY OF PARTISAN ATTITUDES , 1962 .

[17]  Adam Bonica.  Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace: IDEOLOGY AND INTERESTS IN THE POLITICAL MARKETPLACE , 2013 .

[18]  D. Green,et al.  Get Out the Vote!: How to Increase Voter Turnout , 2004 .

[19]  A. Campbell.  SURGE AND DECLINE: A STUDY OF ELECTORAL CHANGE , 1960 .

[20]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[21]  Jon Wakefield,et al.  Ecological inference for 2 × 2 tables , 2004 .

[22]  Ying Lu,et al.  Bayesian and Likelihood Inference for 2 × 2 Ecological Tables: An Incomplete-Data Approach , 2007, Political Analysis.

[23]  J. Denardo,et al.  Does Heavy Turnout Help Democrats in Presidential Elections? , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[24]  B. Highton,et al.  The Political Implications of Higher Turnout , 2001, British Journal of Political Science.

[25]  D. Freedman,et al.  A solution to the ecological inference problem , 1997 .

[26]  J. Zaller.  FLOATING VOTERS IN U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1948-2000 , 2004 .

[27]  Mattias Polborn,et al.  Social Ideology and Taxes in a Differentiated Candidates Framework , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  Seth J. Hill,et al.  Candidate Faces and Election Outcomes: Is the Face-Vote Correlation Caused by Candidate Selection? Corrigendum , 2009, Quarterly Journal of Political Science.

[29]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .

[30]  William G. Mayer.  The Swing Voter in American Presidential Elections , 2007 .

[31]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting. A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1956 .

[32]  S. Rosenstone,et al.  Presidential and Congressional Voters Compared , 1981 .

[33]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. , 1955 .

[34]  Steven J. Rosenstone,et al.  Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America , 1993 .

[35]  James E. Campbell.  The Revised Theory of Surge and Decline , 1987 .

[36]  Justin Buchler.  What is Electoral Competition , 2011 .

[37]  Seth J. Hill.  A behavioral measure of the enthusiasm gap in American elections , 2014 .

[38]  J. Denardo.  Turnout and the Vote: The Joke's on the Democrats , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[39]  Jack H. Nagel,et al.  Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[40]  Walter D. De Vries,et al.  The ticket-splitter : a new force in American politics , 1972 .

[41]  Christopher W. Larimer,et al.  Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment , 2008, American Political Science Review.

[42]  S. McClurg,et al.  The Mobilization of Core Supporters: Campaigns, Turnout, and Electoral Composition in United States Presidential Elections , 2005 .