Surrogate cloud fields generated with the iterative amplitude adapted Fourier transform algorithm

A new method of generating two-dimensional and three-dimensional cloud fields is presented, which share several important statistical properties with real measured cloud fields.Well-known algorithms such as the Fourier method and the Bounded Cascade method generate fields with a specified Fourier spectrum. The new iterative method allows for the specification of both the power spectrum and the amplitude distribution of the parameter of interest, e.g. the liquid water content or liquid water path. As such, the method is well suited to generate cloud fields based on measured data, and it is able to generate broken cloud fields. Important applications of such cloud fields are e.g. closure studies. The algorithm can be supplied with additional spatial constraints which can reduce the number of measured cases needed for such studies. In this study the suitability of the algorithm for radiative questions is evaluated by comparing the radiative properties of cloud fields from cloud resolving models of cumulus and stratocumulus with their surrogate fields at nadir, and for a solar zenith angle of 0◦ and 60◦. The cumulus surrogate clouds ended up to be identical to the large eddy simulation (LES) clouds on which they are based, except for translations and reflections. The root mean square differences of the stratocumulus transmittance and reflectance fields are less than 0.03% of the radiative budget. The radiances and mean actinic fluxes fit better than 2%. These results demonstrate that these LES clouds are well described from a radiative point of view, using only a power spectrum together with an amplitude distribution.

[1]  S. Schmidt,et al.  CLABAUTAIR: a new algorithm for retrieving three-dimensional cloud structure from airborne microphysical measurements , 2004 .

[2]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Thermal radiative fluxes through inhomogeneous cloud fields: a sensitivity study using a new stochastic cloud generator , 2004 .

[3]  Warren J. Wiscombe,et al.  An algorithm for generating stochastic cloud fields from radar profile statistics , 2004 .

[4]  Martin Köhler,et al.  Observations and numerical simulations of the diurnal cycle of the EUROCS stratocumulus case , 2004 .

[5]  A. Feijt,et al.  THE BALTEX BRIDGE CAMPAIGN: An Integrated Approach for a Better Understanding of Clouds , 2004 .

[6]  C. Simmer,et al.  An Integrated Approach toward Retrieving Physically Consistent Profiles of Temperature, Humidity, and Cloud Liquid Water , 2004 .

[7]  S. Lovejoy,et al.  - 1-An Introduction to Stochastic Multifractal Fields , 2004 .

[8]  Forrest J. Masters,et al.  Non-Gaussian Simulation: Cumulative Distribution Function Map-Based Spectral Correction , 2003 .

[9]  A. Tompkins,et al.  Effect of Spatial Organization on Solar Radiative Transfer in Three-Dimensional Idealized Stratocumulus Cloud Fields , 2003 .

[10]  Radiative transfer modelling in inhomogeneous clouds by means of the MonteCarlo method , 2003 .

[11]  G. Mace,et al.  Correction to “Remote sensing of three‐dimensional inhomogeneous cirrus clouds using satellite and mm‐wave cloud radar data” by K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano, J. Roskovensky, G. G. Mace, K. Sassen, and M. Poellot , 2002 .

[12]  Remote sensing of three‐dimensional inhomogeneous cirrus clouds using satellite and mm‐wave cloud radar data , 2002 .

[13]  Jean-Christophe Golaz,et al.  Large‐eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land , 2002 .

[14]  S. Raasch,et al.  3 . 5 BROADENING OF CONVECTIVE CELLS DURING COLD AIR OUTBREAKS : A HIGH RESOLUTION STUDY USING A PARALLELIZED LES MODEL , 2002 .

[15]  Gregory M. Lewis,et al.  JP 4 . 16 AN ITERATIVE METHOD FOR GENERATING SCALING LOG-NORMAL SIMULATIONS , 2002 .

[16]  A. Macke,et al.  On the accuracy of the independent column approximation in calculating the downward fluxes in the UVA, UVB, and PAR spectral ranges , 2001 .

[17]  Clemens Simmer,et al.  Microwave Radiometer for Cloud Carthography: A 22-channel ground-based microwave radiometer for atmospheric research , 2001 .

[18]  A. Los,et al.  Microphysical and radiative properties of inhomogeneous stratocumulus: Observations and model simulations , 2000 .

[19]  T. Schreiber,et al.  Surrogate time series , 1999, chao-dyn/9909037.

[20]  D. Kugiumtzis,et al.  Test your surrogate data before you test for nonlinearity. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[21]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Horizontal structure of marine boundary layer clouds from centimeter to kilometer scales , 1999 .

[22]  A. Macke,et al.  Monte Carlo radiative transfer calculations for inhomogeneous mixed phase clouds , 1999 .

[23]  K. Evans.  The Spherical Harmonics Discrete Ordinate Method for Three-Dimensional Atmospheric Radiative Transfer , 1998 .

[24]  Schreiber,et al.  Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[25]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Scale Invariance of Liquid Water Distributions in Marine Stratocumulus. Part I: Spectral Properties and Stationarity Issues , 1996 .

[26]  James Theiler,et al.  Constrained-realization Monte-carlo Method for Hypothesis Testing , 1996 .

[27]  Robert F. Cahalan.  Bounded cascade clouds: albedo and effective thickness , 1994 .

[28]  Anthony W. England,et al.  Special problems in the estimation of power-law spectra as applied to topographical modeling , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  George Christakos,et al.  Random Field Models in Earth Sciences , 1992 .