Recent studies have been published regarding hydrodynamic phenomena in microcarrier cultures of FS-4I4 and BEK cells . 5 , 6 A frequent question regarding these results concerns their translation to other cell lines. The results for a particular cell line may depend on several factors, such as the strength and nature of the attachment between the cells and microcarriers. FS-4 cells are human diploid fibroblasts and are fully anchorage dependent. They attach very strongly to microcarriers at normal pH levels7 except during the later stage of a culture when they migrate together and form spheroids. Hydrodynamic studies with FS-4 cells were performed during the growth stage prior to spheroid formation.’-4 The results indicate that FS-4 cells are irreversibly removed from Cytodex 1 microcarriers by excessive hydrodynamic force^.^ All of the cells which remain on the microcarriers are viable and grow at a rate independent of the level of agitation. The cells in suspension are nonviable and incapable of attachment. Hydrodynamic removal of an FS-4 cell appears to leave a “footprint” which precludes secondary growth over that position. For the purposes of comparison, a short set of hydrodynamic studies was also performed with recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells engineered to produce gamma interferon. These CHO cells are aneuploid and, although not fully anchorage-dependent, are difficult to grow in suspension.839 CHO cells were chosen not only because they have different attachment properties than FS-4 cells, but also because of their common use in recombinant protein production. The results of the experiments with the CHO cells are reported here.
[1]
Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.
Viscous reduction of turbulent damage in animal cell culture
,
1989,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[2]
Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.
Fiber bed reactor design for animal cell culture
,
1989,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[3]
M S Croughan,et al.
Hydrodynamic effects on animal cells grown in microcarrier cultures
,
1987,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[4]
M S Croughan,et al.
Growth and death in overagitated microcarrier cell cultures
,
1989,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[5]
Eleftherios T. Papoutsakis,et al.
Growth and death rates of bovine embryonic kidney cells in turbulent microcarrier bioreactors
,
1989
.
[6]
E. Papoutsakis,et al.
Physical mechanisms of cell damage in microcarrier cell culture bioreactors
,
1988,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[7]
D. I. Wang,et al.
Effects of microcarrier concentration in animal cell culture
,
1988,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[8]
D. Tester.
Communication to the Editor
,
1984
.
[9]
D. Giard,et al.
Serial propagation of mammalian cells on microcarriers
,
1985,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.